False flag chemical attacks in Syria. Just shut your eyes and ignore it like sheep

[carbonhed]

Conspiracy FACT

Ah the joys of freedom of speech!

Wipe your chin you fucking goober.

[Oscar]

BTW 911 was a false flag attack perpetrated by the shadow govt and its lacky spy agencies in order to hide Trillions of dollars of unaccounted taxpayer dollars stolen by the MIC and to provide an igniter to gain the support of US citizens in a drive to overthrow middle east regimes who have/had refused to accept U$ as payment for oil. Conspiracy FACT

Wow, you have the motivation down pat, don't you?

A pity you have absolutely nothing else concrete.

No "smoking gun".
Just a bunch of rumours and half truths.

The stupidity of the 911 Conspiracy Theorists is unbelievable.
Just for example - why blow the buildings up, AFTER flying a coupla planes into them?
Why not just blow them up and blame it on AQ?
Not hard to do, I would think.

Notwithstanding that, you're asking us to believe that several tons of explosives and miles of cable were secreted in buildings where 10,000 people worked and no one noticed.
But wait - the buildings started collapsing two thirds of the way up, right where the planes hit (what a surprise), so did that mean that the suicide pilots were incredibly accurate and managed to fly into the correct floor (i.e. the one with explosives in) at 800km/h? OR did someone carry several tons of dynamite up after the plane crash?

A couple of simple questions, which you won't answer coz all you're going to do is call me a sheep and direct me to some You Tube of another nutter with no evidence.

[flyingcrocodile46]

Wow, you have the motivation down pat, don't you?

A pity you have absolutely nothing else concrete.

No "smoking gun".
Just a bunch of rumours and half truths.

The stupidity of the 911 Conspiracy Theorists is unbelievable.
Just for example - why blow the buildings up, AFTER flying a coupla planes into them?
Why not just blow them up and blame it on AQ?
Not hard to do, I would think.

Notwithstanding that, you're asking us to believe that several tons of explosives and miles of cable were secreted in buildings where 10,000 people worked and no one noticed.
But wait - the buildings started collapsing two thirds of the way up, right where the planes hit (what a surprise), so did that mean that the suicide pilots were incredibly accurate and managed to fly into the correct floor (i.e. the one with explosives in) at 800km/h? OR did someone carry several tons of dynamite up after the plane crash?

A couple of simple questions, which you won't answer coz all you're going to do is call me a sheep and direct me to some You Tube of another nutter with no evidence.

Actually there is a lot of evidence in most of the Youtube documentaries out there. But the funny thing about evidence is that you must be prepared to engage your brain in order to recognise it. The fact that you can't seem to acknowledge the evidence that is there, pretty much demonstrates that you just aren't capable of ever understanding what happened or why, because you are either incapable of/or unwilling to look at undesirable data objectively.

Much of the referenced evidence and facts are either public record or scientifically verifiable, and only requires that you do a little of your own leg work to verify it (rather than asking a third party to do it for you so you can accuse them of making it up). Frankly, if you haven't got the ability to do that by yourself, you aren't worth the effort to help.

If I thought for a minute that you:
A. Would read it &
B. Could read it &
C. Could understand it &
D. Could appraise it objectively,
I would show you a 59 page document composed from research carried out by a number of parties including the ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence), FBI, CIA, SEC and many others, which provides a great deal of insight and a *daunting* amount of verifiable evidence as to why it was done. But frankly it is way too fucking scary and complicated and I know that your only interest in the subject is to discredit it, so that won't be happening any time soon.

I say "daunting" because of the huge amount of work required to verify all of it. Of course it isn't daunting to a denier as deniers don't verify, they just deny.

Have you stopped to wonder why you are so determined to deny any possibility that the 911 event was a false flag attack? If you think about it, you will realise that there can only be one logical reason for you to invest the effort rather than simply ignoring it............... It scares the shit out of you so much that simply ignoring it, isn't enough to make the tremors go away.

[flyingcrocodile46]

Ah the joys of freedom of speech!

Wipe your chin you fucking goober.

I'm guessing you jizzed on your keyboard as you typed that

[Woodman]

Actually there is a lot of evidence in most of the Youtube documentaries out there. But the funny thing about evidence is that you must be prepared to engage your brain in order to recognise it. The fact that you can't seem to acknowledge the evidence that is there, pretty much demonstrates that you just aren't capable of ever understanding what happened or why, because you are either incapable of/or unwilling to look at undesirable data objectively.

Much of the referenced evidence and facts are either public record or scientifically verifiable, and only requires that you do a little of your own leg work to verify it (rather than asking a third party to do it for you so you can accuse them of making it up). Frankly, if you haven't got the ability to do that by yourself, you aren't worth the effort to help.

If I thought for a minute that you:
A. Would read it &
B. Could read it &
C. Could understand it &
D. Could appraise it objectively,
I would show you a 59 page document composed from research carried out by a number of parties including the ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence), FBI, CIA, SEC and many others, which provides a great deal of insight and a *daunting* amount of verifiable evidence as to why it was done. But frankly it is way too fucking scary and complicated and I know that you're only interest in the subject is to discredit it, so that won't be happening any time soon.

I say "daunting" because of the huge amount of work required to verify all of it. Of course it isn't daunting to a denier as deniers don't verify, they just deny.

Have you stopped to wonder why you are so determined to deny any possibility that the 911 event was a false flag attack? If you think about it, you will realise that there can only be one logical reason for you to invest the effort rather than simply ignoring it............... It scares the shit out of you so much that simply ignoring it, isn't enough to make the tremors go away.

A 59 page document by all those 3 letter departments? Wow thats a lot of pages, 59 whole pages full of words? ,really? wow so many pages so many words aye.

[flyingcrocodile46]

A 59 page document by all those 3 letter departments? Wow thats a lot of pages, 59 whole pages full of words? ,really? wow so many pages so many words aye.

Perhaps you could manage a 36 second video.

2.3 Trillion lost by Penatgon in 1999 another 1.2 Trillion lost in 2000. Rumsfield made this delivery where he announced an investigation into it (the day before 911)..... though in reality the ONI had already carried out the investigation and had the evidence, but they were all killed in the pentagon attack and the external evidence storage locations in the two towers, buildings 6 & 7 were also destroyed.

Here's the smallest possible bite for little mouths to chew on. Yes the video quality is crap, but there are many much longer ones with better quality footage out there. You can either do your own research for more or you can ask a 911 truther really nicely and they might help those of you who are too handicapped to do it themselves.

[Katman]

Notwithstanding that, you're asking us to believe that several tons of explosives and miles of cable were secreted in buildings where 10,000 people worked and no one noticed.

Remember the extensive elevator refurbishment that took place in the weeks leading up to 9/11?

Ever heard of wireless detonators?

[Oscar]

Actually there is a lot of evidence in most of the Youtube documentaries out there. But the funny thing about evidence is that you must be prepared to engage your brain in order to recognise it. The fact that you can't seem to acknowledge the evidence that is there, pretty much demonstrates that you just aren't capable of ever understanding what happened or why, because you are either incapable of/or unwilling to look at undesirable data objectively.

Much of the referenced evidence and facts are either public record or scientifically verifiable, and only requires that you do a little of your own leg work to verify it (rather than asking a third party to do it for you so you can accuse them of making it up). Frankly, if you haven't got the ability to do that by yourself, you aren't worth the effort to help.

If I thought for a minute that you:
A. Would read it &
B. Could read it &
C. Could understand it &
D. Could appraise it objectively,
I would show you a 59 page document composed from research carried out by a number of parties including the ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence), FBI, CIA, SEC and many others, which provides a great deal of insight and a *daunting* amount of verifiable evidence as to why it was done. But frankly it is way too fucking scary and complicated and I know that your only interest in the subject is to discredit it, so that won't be happening any time soon.

I say "daunting" because of the huge amount of work required to verify all of it. Of course it isn't daunting to a denier as deniers don't verify, they just deny.

Have you stopped to wonder why you are so determined to deny any possibility that the 911 event was a false flag attack? If you think about it, you will realise that there can only be one logical reason for you to invest the effort rather than simply ignoring it............... It scares the shit out of you so much that simply ignoring it, isn't enough to make the tremors go away.

That's a hell of a lot of words to say: "I got nothing".
When you say "insight", you actually mean "innuendo", because the best you've got is the DOD having budget problems.
I've looked at any number of web pages and I have still yet see anything that could be described as a smoking gun.

[flyingcrocodile46]

That's a hell of a lot of words to say: "I got nothing".
When you say "insight", you actually mean "innuendo", because the best you've got is the DOD having budget problems.
I've looked at any number of web pages and I have still yet see anything that could be described as a smoking gun.

"I got nothing" is your quote, not mine. This is the problem with idiots and deniers. You just aren't capable of processing data without deliberately distorting or ignoring 99% of it, as you illustrated with your statement "the best you've got is the DOD having budget problems" You have disconnected your eyes from your brain so you can not see. Pussy.

You wouldn't recognise a smoking gun if it was lying in a pool of blood next to a corpse.

I haven't the time or inclination to waste any more effort on the brain dead. You are dismissed.

[Woodman]

"I got nothing" is your quote, not mine. This is the problem with idiots and deniers. You just aren't capable of processing data without deliberately distorting or ignoring 99% of it, as you illustrated with your statement "the best you've got is the DOD having budget problems" You have disconnected your eyes from your brain so you can not see. Pussy.

You wouldn't recognise a smoking gun if it was lying in a pool of blood next to a corpse.

I haven't the time or inclination to waste any more effort on the brain dead. You are dismissed.

Mate the evidence you come up with on giggle tv and other such one eyed forums is completely one sided and you accuse us sheep of ignoring evidence.

Show us a balanced view and we may, just may begin to take you seriously.

[Oscar]

"I got nothing" is your quote, not mine. This is the problem with idiots and deniers. You just aren't capable of processing data without deliberately distorting or ignoring 99% of it, as you illustrated with your statement "the best you've got is the DOD having budget problems" You have disconnected your eyes from your brain so you can not see. Pussy.

You wouldn't recognise a smoking gun if it was lying in a pool of blood next to a corpse.

I haven't the time or inclination to waste any more effort on the brain dead. You are dismissed.

Thank you for proving my point.
You have nothing.

[mashman]

Thank you for proving my point.
You have nothing.

Interesting stand point given that throughout the entire thread the only link you have used to back up your position was to Monty Pythons "What have the Romans ever done for us" sketch.

[Oscar]

Interesting stand point given that throughout the entire thread the only link you have used to back up your position was to Monty Pythons "What have the Romans ever done for us" sketch.

Typically, you get things arse about face.
I'm not the one pushing the conspiracy theory, so why would I post anything?
Since there is no actual facts presented how/why would I bother to refute them?

All I'm asking is that one of these tin foil hat idiots post one piece of evidence.
Evidence, mind you - not interesting coincidences (elevator maintenance) or innuendo (DOD budget blowout).
Or maybe - just explain how and why you would put together a event that involved planes crashing into buildings that were later demolished, so that Bush could start a war that he could almost certainly justify before 9/11?

Occam's Razor, baby.

[mashman]

Typically, you get things arse about face.
I'm not the one pushing the conspiracy theory, so why would I post anything?
Since there is no actual facts presented how/why would I bother to refute them?

All I'm asking is that one of these tin foil hat idiots post one piece of evidence.
Evidence, mind you - not interesting coincidences (elevator maintenance) or innuendo (DOD budget blowout).
Or maybe - just explain how and why you would put together a event that involved planes crashing into buildings that were later demolished, so that Bush could start a war that he could almost certainly justify before 9/11?

Occam's Razor, baby.

bwaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa.
Yes you are.
There have been plenty of facts presented in link and video format in this thread alone. Facts from professionals and experts. Even the UN can't deny that it may have been the rebels who fired the missiles... and then you say that you haven't refuted anything in the thread? Selective memory much.

Lots of evidence has been posted.
Oh, so now we're on 9/11. I find those sorts of things as plausible, not necessarily what happened, but certainly more plausible than every single structural element failing at the same time... especially when the fire didn't engulf every side of the building. Ever play jenga?
Do they have to put it together or just let it happen? You did see the Clark video right?

You're holding that razor incorrectly.

[Katman]

All I'm asking is that one of these tin foil hat idiots post one piece of evidence.

See, that's your biggest problem. While you continue to view anyone that questions the official story as 'tin foil hat idiots' you're not going to be at all open to reason.

The reality is though that there are many thousands of people who are quite possibly considerably smarter than yourself who question the official story.