False flag chemical attacks in Syria. Just shut your eyes and ignore it like sheep

**mashman** · 25th September 2013, 07:51

How to train your denier.

**SPman** · 25th September 2013, 10:18

Originally Posted by Woodman

And the difference between people supporting authority and you believing the blogger you support is ?

Conspiracy theorists see other conspiracy theorists as authorities, so fcuk knows what mashman and Flyingcrocodile are going on about.

"believing the blogger you support"..........not necessarily - I don't "believe" much at all - without questioning it thoroughly as I can, first. Most people don't question authority - unless it becomes so blatant that it overwhelms even their desire to fit in - and is shared by enough others to make them feel less insecure about it.
Conspiracy theorists - another convenient label to marginalise groups that don't buy in to official versions of events.......

**Hinny** · 25th September 2013, 20:03

I see the Russians have now supplied an one hundred page dosier on the origin of the weapons used in Syria two days after the UN inspectors arrived
This apparently details to whom these weapons were sold.
This combined with the satellite imagery they supplied, puts the US four page opinion piece into the trash where it clearly belonged.

**carbonhed** · 25th September 2013, 21:12

Originally Posted by Hinny

I see the Russians have now supplied an one hundred page dosier on the origin of the weapons used in Syria two days after the UN inspectors arrived
This apparently details to whom these weapons were sold.
This combined with the satellite imagery they supplied, puts the US four page opinion piece into the trash where it clearly belonged.

Aaaaand the link is......

**mashman** · 25th September 2013, 22:02

Originally Posted by carbonhed

Aaaaand the link is......

It's in the post... well, not in the post as in in the post, but it's in the post that was posted.

**carbonhed** · 25th September 2013, 22:11

Originally Posted by mashman

It's in the post... well, not in the post as in in the post, but it's in the post that was posted.

Cool. I was beginning to think he was an entirely retarded cocksucker... but hey if it's in the post.

**mashman** · 25th September 2013, 22:21

Originally Posted by carbonhed

Cool. I was beginning to think he was an entirely retarded cocksucker... but hey if it's in the post.

He can't be, well, not entirely, but only because he's an authority.

**carbonhed** · 25th September 2013, 22:34

Originally Posted by SPman

An intersting post on the phenomenon of belief, conformity and peer and societal pressure by a blogger I help support called Arthur Silber.......
seems to tie in with the Millgram experiments.....2/3rds of people will run with authority regardless.........

I can see how those studies might give you a tiny, half hearted, chubby but if you really want to see what the shrinks think about you google "conspiracy ideation"... then we'll see if the warm fuzzies survive being called an inconsequential, paranoid, loser... I suspect not... but I have been known to be wrong... unlike conspiracy theorists.

**mashman** · 25th September 2013, 22:55

Originally Posted by carbonhed

I can see how those studies might give you a tiny, half hearted, chubby but if you really want to see what the shrinks think about you google "conspiracy ideation"... then we'll see if the warm fuzzies survive being called an inconsequential, paranoid, loser... I suspect not... but I have been known to be wrong... unlike conspiracy theorists.

How many fingers am I holding up Winston?

**Hinny** · 25th September 2013, 23:02

Originally Posted by carbonhed

... but I have been known to be wrong...

I'd hazard a guess -that would be a time or two.

**flyingcrocodile46** · 25th September 2013, 23:35

Originally Posted by Hinny

I'd hazard a guess -that would be a time or two.

Oh, I think the Jar is much bigger than that

**Oscar** · 26th September 2013, 09:51

Originally Posted by Hinny

I see the Russians have now supplied an one hundred page dosier on the origin of the weapons used in Syria two days after the UN inspectors arrived
This apparently details to whom these weapons were sold.
This combined with the satellite imagery they supplied, puts the US four page opinion piece into the trash where it clearly belonged.

That's OK then, coz the Russian ain't biased, and they always tell the truth..

**SPman** · 26th September 2013, 13:45

About as truthful as the US.......or UK.......or.......any county counting themselves as a major player..........

**Oscar** · 26th September 2013, 14:37

Originally Posted by SPman

About as truthful as the US.......or UK.......or.......any county counting themselves as a major player..........

Precisely

So why is the poster saying that the Russian report means that the US report was a "piece of trash"?

I don't believe either of them.

**Hinny** · 26th September 2013, 19:59

Originally Posted by Oscar

The reason for my opinion is that any time I ask a reasonable question, like - why would you have a plan that involved crashing planes into buildings AND blowing them up, I never get an answer.
And if they blew those buildings up, how come no one saw the preparations? All get to that one is "elevator maintenance" - do you know how much explosive is required to bring a building like that down?
But the biggie is - no physical evidence or eyewitnesses.

There may be all sorts of interesting shit going on, but logically you have to get past the nuts and bolts of the basic, observable evidence.

Checked out the video I suggested you watch yet?
in 3 parts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCw1TjfNKow