False flag chemical attacks in Syria. Just shut your eyes and ignore it like sheep

[jonbuoy]

Has there ever been a transition from Monarchy Rule/Dictatorship that hasn´t ended in civil war/unrest. These countries have been relatively "peaceful" internally because someone had a foot on their throats - take that foot off and all that frustration will come boiling out. Hopefully it will be worth it in the long run for them.

[george formby]

Robert Fisk's column in the Independent yesterday. HERE

He seems to have two eyes attached to a brain & appears to be humanist. Read a book of his "The war for civilisation". Bit of an eye opener to say the least.

The plot thickens.

[Crasherfromwayback]

Robert Fisk's column in the Independent yesterday. HERE

He seems to have two eyes attached to a brain & appears to be humanist. Read a book of his "The war for civilisation". Bit of an eye opener to say the least.

The plot thickens.

Either way the whole area is a serious cluster fuck.

[george formby]

Either way the whole area is a serious cluster fuck.

Yup, that's exactly what that book was about. His comments in the book, a few years old now, are proving to very prescient.

[flyingcrocodile46]

One thing that may come of this is sustained increases in oil costs. That would help add some profit to the operations of competing reserves which have more expensive oil extraction costs.


In further news it appears that the leaked emails (hacked from Britam Defence) outlining plans to fake a chemical weapons attack to frame Assad were themselves faked.

Watch video for details of who discovered the fraud and how it was discovered.
http://youtu.be/6R7knc-G360

[flyingcrocodile46]

Speaking of fraud, I hear that the irrefutable evidence that Obama is relying on to prove Assad used the chemical weapons comes directly from mossad special communications interception teams


Better news is that there are indications that both Obama and Cameron are under pressure from public opinion (polls in the US and people on their feet in the UK). Obama is now rather waveringly making talk about the security risk that Syrian chemical weapons pose to the US in the event that they should "fall into the wrong hands" as some sort of justification for action .

Maybe a vote in UK tonight to rule out any UK involvement in military actions not sanctioned by the UN

[pzkpfw]

Is there any doubt civilians were gassed? No?

In that case, I don't even care who "did it": it just needs to be stopped.

If the people who say "the West should stay out of it, leave them to sort it out themselves" are right; then it doesn't matter, either, if Western intervention does or does not result in a change in the balance of power.

And the Western forces are not going to send planes to bomb cities WWII style, a-la Rotterdam, Coventry, Darwin, Tokyo, Dresden etc; they will be using precision guided weapons to target high-value Government and military targets. Thus, I still don't particularly care.



We can spend the rest of the year gazing at our navels wondering whose intelligence is real and whose is faked, and what's false-flag and what's real.

In the meantime, more civilians get killed.

[SPman]

You imagine civilians won't be killed in "precision air strikes"?

"Collateral damage" has never been high on the list of priorities to avoid..........by any of the forces involved......

[mashman]

We can spend the rest of the year gazing at our navels wondering whose intelligence is real and whose is faked, and what's false-flag and what's real.

In the meantime, more civilians get killed.

+1............

[Laava]

We can spend the rest of the year gazing at our navels wondering whose intelligence is real and whose is faked, and what's false-flag and what's real.

In the meantime, more civilians get killed.

Sadly, you need to get used to it because there is nothing that you or I or the US can do to stop it.
It has been going on for ever and will continue, in many more countries as it currently is. Why is the US not diving into places like Liberia where human rights are non existant?

[Katman]

Why is the US not diving into places like Liberia where human rights are non existant?

Just as they sat back and did nothing during the genocide in Rwanda.

Regardless of who was responsible for the chemical attacks you can be sure that if America becomes involved, it has an ulterior motive for doing so.

The idea that America tries to present itself as some sort of international peacemaker is laughable.

[Crasherfromwayback]

In the meantime, more civilians get killed.

I have a nasty feeling that if the Yanks get involved even more might die though. And not just in Syria.

[flyingcrocodile46]

A very interesting look at some very complicated motivations involving several countries and their interests in Syria.

[carbonhed]

A very interesting look at some very complicated motivations involving several countries and their interests in Syria.

Somebody seriously needs to buy that prick some contact lenses... I was getting a headache just looking at his pin head.

I thought the MSM was lame but after wading through the entirety of this low brow drivel I hold them in new esteem.

Russia, who supplies Europe with most of it's gas is supporting Syria so that it can build a pipeline to flood the European market with Iranian gas... while Israel wants to sell Europe gas and Europe sits on vast quantities of unconventional gas and Qatar wants to sell really expensive LNG so it's funding the destabiliisation of Syria and it's all Americas fault.

Well that clears everything up then.

[Hinny]

Syria and Iran came into the gunsights when they signed a deal to build a pipeline through Pakistan to India in competition with the Yanks pipeline from Turkmenistan which they were fighting a protracted war in Afghanistan over.
One can imagine how pissed off they would be when that deal was made.

Cameron in Parliament was in full blood lust mode again I saw. There is something very seriously wrong with that man. Some might suggest he is a Sociopath and they wouldn't get any arguement from me. Seems rather deranged.
I was very relieved that the majority of the house of commons could see the sense in not bombing and killing people because somebody had bombed and killed their families.
The suggestion that it was the Syrian govt. seems absurd given the circumstances.
Simple test is who has the most to gain.
US story tellers are at it again.
First they are saying this is the first time chemical weapons have been used in Syria. - They seemed to forget about the terrorists using chemical weapons a year ago.
Today they are saying this is the fourteenth time chemical weapons have been used in the last year.
It seems the US administration is populated with pathological liars.
I am very disappointed in John Kerry - the hero of the anti Vietnam war movement - today a bizarre Hawk venting blood lust. Similarly for the 'Nobel Peace Prize' winner.
What changes these people?
Do they get brainwashed or re-programmed? Something slipped into their food or drink and then their brains get fucked with.
I find the conception, that they change their thinking to the opposite of how they used to think, quite unbelievable.