
Originally Posted by
Ocean1
Damned right there's a cultural thing.
You need to expand on this - I fail to see how science is a cultural thing - except at a deeply philosophical level.
Science is no more difficult than any other discipline, (oops, there's that D word) it's just that you can't lower the bar with the hard sciences like they've done with the soft ones.
I'm not sure that is true. Science is not that hard, becasue at least at the early stages, there are right and wrong aswers that can be learnt - once you get to the philosophical level, the people like Paul Feyerabend through spannes in the works - but as far as the practical side goes, there are still right and wrong, or workable, answers.
The "soft" sciences do not have right and wrong answers - the ability to interpret data and the juist plain think is important - as well as the ability to justify the answers research arrives at. These are not disciplines where the right answer can be memorised
It's not only culturally correct as far as the significantly socialist leaning teaching profession's concerned but also a fucking site less work to just gloss over the lack of performance by simply expecting less of the students.
Again - this is not true. Pupils pass the "soft" sciences by their ability to argue and discuss, not by their ability to rote learn correct answers.
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Bookmarks