lol, so if the bloke had been looking after your portfolio for ten years before you found out he was cheating on his wife the whole time, youd change, even though youd been seeing great gains the whole time?
would you give all the money he'd made you back as well, since you don't approve of that behaviour?![]()
according to her affidavit (which is a MASTERWORK in how to damn someone by the way - totally worth the time to read) he was not very good at the sex, AND cheaped out on the lingerie he bought her.
You're earning good money, dude, you buy your wife the cheap lingerie and the mistress the expensive stuff. Jeeeez everybody knows that. Plus buy decent champagne AND get some Viagra. Also, manscaping and hit the gym.
Am I the only one who knows this stuff?
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
The sex don't matter so much but he mixed the two together and fucked up as Mayor, big time! ... Spot the difference!![]()
He's a fucking asshole.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crim...g-set-to-trial
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
Just another leather clad Tinkerbell.
The Wanker on the Fucking Harley is going for a ride!
hmm, so, should you be fired everytime you do something at home that your boss doesnt approve of? even if it doesnt have any impact on your ability to do the job you are employed for?
not too far off being the same thing than expecting this guy to resign because he likes asian pussy!
I read the link to the affidavit, out of curiosity. While it makes for sordid reading, I do have to wonder two things. Firstly, what was the point? ie. what did the publisher feel there was to be gained by it? (regardless of peoples' moral standpoints). Secondly, she obviously wasn't a "young naive person who was under the thumb of a superior" - at 29 (28 at the least) she's hardly a brainless young chicken; she said she said no initially but that she wasn't unwilling; felt the need to comment that the lingerie he bought her was "cheap, I know this because I had to return them to the store as they were the wrong size" etc. It takes two to tango, and I'm picking there is more to the whole sordid mess than meets the eye. Either she's getting something out of it OR the amoral publisher of the affidavit has got some sort of agenda from this issue. I find it hard to accept that she's an innocent victim who had no control over anything.
So this guy would be welcome in Auckland (The City of Semen) then? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Wal-Mart.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks