My meaning, as anyone with half a brain would have understood, was simply that it is just one more thing that will need to be sorted out before weed can become legal.
The presence of THC in someone's system, might not be relative to how much of an influence it's having. So standards need to be set with regard to levels...Hmmm, who's going to pay for that research I wonder? Why should I as a tax payer, fund research into something so that a minority want?
I have and had nothing but a cup of coffee in my mouth...except maybe the words you continue to try and put there for me.
You are a fail in terms of argument fodder. I think I'll save my time for a worthy adversary next time. That you don't even race should have put me off, but I was after a shit fight after all and thought you could oblige.
Nope. You'll be hard-pressed to get me to take an asprin.
Ed's your man, he's a fucking expert on the subject. Apparently, according to Ed, you can eat a metric fuck-ton of Tramadol & you're sweet but one puff of a Marijuana cigarette & the wheels will fall off your motorsickle & the sky will fall soon after. Maybe MNZ could appoint Ed as their chief drug-tester, now there's an idea! Grubber could be his deputy as we all know he can spot a Cannabis user from 500 metres away in the dark.Originally Posted by roogazza
depends. What hes talking about are opiates (poppys, basically. And an alkaloid, as nicotine, and datura)
every drug will affect every body differently. One of the fairly universal functions of opiates is analgesia. I can chew a half dozen codeine and function, but you could kick me in the balls and if i didnt see it, i probably wouldnt feel it. There is no ' high' asides from the abscence of the low (the chronic pain and black pit that is my existence.)
BUT i can still recreationally use opium, heroin.
I would also welcome the opportunity to be ABILITY(/impairment) tested while under 'the influence', i reckon the results would surprise the hell out of the anti-weed/eccy/heroin/coke/etcetera brigade, and theyd be left with only the tired old 'but its illegal' argumen
Come on Drew, everyone knows drugs are illegal and I'm clearly not suggesting anyone has the right to get shit-faced prior to going racing. I simply disagree with the implementation of substandard testing methods in regards to Cannabis. How would the non-smoking alcohol users like it if they were in a similar situation and the test methods being used only showed a trace or a presence of alcohol but couldn't determine impairment?
The point of testing for drugs in any sport should be restricted to reducing danger & eliminating unfair competition. In the case of Cannabis where the presence of THC can remain in the human body weeks after any effects have gone completely, it becomes no longer about reducing danger or eliminating unfair competition but about testing for lifestyle choice.
What's next? Testing for Jews & Homos? You'll be fucked then.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks