Lawyer advocating 10% less jail sentence for Maori

**Zedder** · 27th November 2013, 17:07

Originally Posted by oldrider

At a guess Jews make up less than 1% of the world population, funny thing is that they always seem to be involved in about 99% of world problems!

Or is that simply because they are so prominent in things like media, music, theatre, movies, politics, law, weapons, banking, medicine, education, ETC ETC ETC!

Maybe it's just my imagination but sometimes it seems that Akzle does have a point!

Try 0.2%. IMHO, the anti-Jewish sentiment probably boils down to the very human feelings of fear and jealousy with a bit of religious competition thrown in.

Other races feature prominantly in all the facets you wrote of, for example Chinese and Indian, but there's a lot less Jews doing very well so that's a "problem" to some in itself.

**Akzle** · 27th November 2013, 17:16

Originally Posted by Zedder

Try 0.2%. IMHO, the anti-Jewish sentiment probably boils down to the very human feelings of fear and jealousy with a bit of religious competition thrown in.

ah. I see some kindly mod moved the explanation to pd. More lulz i guess.

There is a difference between jewish people, and jews.
If you act like a jew, regardless of which god you suck off, youre a jew.
Its a noundjective.

**Zedder** · 27th November 2013, 18:05

Originally Posted by Akzle

ah. I see some kindly mod moved the explanation to pd. More lulz i guess.

There is a difference between jewish people, and jews.
If you act like a jew, regardless of which god you suck off, youre a jew.
Its a noundjective.

Not the way you describe it.

**Akzle** · 27th November 2013, 18:08

Originally Posted by Zedder

Not the way you describe it.

that is the way i describe it.

Just did.

Right there.

One post before yours.

**Zedder** · 27th November 2013, 18:23

Originally Posted by Akzle

that is the way i describe it.

Just did.

Right there.

One post before yours.

Nah, all you did was name two nouns. Even at the wildest stretch of the imagination (let's call it Akzlese) it's not even slightly becoming an adjective.

**mashman** · 27th November 2013, 18:25

Originally Posted by Zedder

Nah, all you did was name two nouns. Even at the wildest stretch of the imagination (let's call it Akzlese) it's not even slightly becoming an adjective.

Yes it is.

**Akzle** · 27th November 2013, 18:33

Originally Posted by Zedder

Nah, all you did was name two nouns. Even at the wildest stretch of the imagination (let's call it Akzlese) it's not even slightly becoming an adjective.

not the brightest crayon in the dishwasher are ya?

I never said it was an adjective.
If i call you A JEW its because you exhibit jew traits, like fucking people over to get money.
Like if i call you A FAG, im not actually implying you are a bundle of sticks, nor a hommo sexcual, just that youre exhibiting fag traits.

**Zedder** · 27th November 2013, 18:40

Originally Posted by Akzle

not the brightest crayon in the dishwasher are ya?

I never said it was an adjective.
If i call you A JEW its because you exhibit jew traits, like fucking people over to get money.
Like if i call you A FAG, im not actually implying you are a bundle of sticks, nor a hommo sexcual, just that youre exhibiting fag traits.

Firstly, you wrote it was a nounadjective. Secondly, both examples are naming ie: nouns.

**Akzle** · 27th November 2013, 18:45

Originally Posted by Zedder

Firstly, you wrote it was a nounadjective. Secondly, both examples are naming ie: nouns.

youre adding vowels.
And being obtuse.

**Zedder** · 27th November 2013, 18:58

Originally Posted by Akzle

youre adding vowels.
And being obtuse.

You left out a capital and an apostrophe.

Maybe, it's because I would actually say "Don't act like a Jew or "You're acting like a Jew" that makes the difference.

**Akzle** · 27th November 2013, 19:07

Originally Posted by Zedder

You left out a capital and an apostrophe.

but not a vowel.

Its ok. Grammer Not required in akzlese.

**Brian d marge** · 27th November 2013, 20:03

Originally Posted by Zedder

A better practice would be to charge the crims for their prison stays like in 18th century Britain.

This would help balance the books a bit and save the tax payers plenty. Presumably a 10% discount could be arranged for repeat offenders...

We are　first we have to privatize the prisions then we the tax payers pay for the people in the prisions then the profits go to the company running the scheme
The more in jail the more profit

Nail em up i say especially if i have shares in the prision scam

Nail em up

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

**Gremlin** · 27th November 2013, 20:35

Originally Posted by Banditbandit

The "stuck 150 years ago" mindset is not ours ...

Who's "ours"

Of course, if neither side thinks it's their fault, it's never going to be fixed either. There are enablers on both sides and it takes two to tango. Sure, plenty of success like you list (which is good) and the big tribes are run like businesses, with investment advice, their positions etc.

There are still elements running around seeking compensation... uh, they weren't alive right back (unless they're referring to events earlier in the 20th century). Either way, I don't really care. The government, or general populace of the country shouldn't be enabling the claims either. Now, the way the Australians treat the Aborigines is hardly a good model to emulate, but there needs to be a balance.

Both sides should be finalising claims and being done with it.

**oldrider** · 27th November 2013, 21:48

Originally Posted by Akzle

not the brightest crayon in the dishwasher are ya?

I never said it was an adjective.
If i call you A JEW its because you exhibit jew traits, like fucking people over to get money.
Like if i call you A FAG, im not actually implying you are a bundle of sticks, nor a hommo sexcual, just that youre exhibiting fag traits.

Akzle ... maybe some of the information on this site could be of intrest to you?: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=534