
Originally Posted by
ken seeber
Fellers, your timing is good. We are doing a little project where we have 3d printed out some short manifold stubs. We then created a 2 piece mould using a Vinamold equivalent, creating the inside and outside shapes of the printed item. Then into the cavity (after the printed item was removed) we poured in moulding wax. Beautiful, good surface reproduction etc.
Then what to do next. Firstly we set the wax model into a plaster/sand/water mix. After semi drying for a day or so, we put it into an oven and gradually melted out the wax, going finally to around 110 deg. The wax appeared to be basically melted out, but there was still a surface residue. Anyways, as we were doing a piston cast, we put the plaster mould on the furnace and its temp probably was around 250 or so. Then we splashed some metal in. Started off ok, but then lots of bubbles and aeration of the metal, and no minor shortage of thick smoke.
When cool, we broke away the plaster and one could see that the casting started off ok at the bottom, but went to shit further up. The plaster though, showed that the wax had permeated into the surface to a depth of around 10 mm or so. I guess this was the cause of the problem as it was heated and started to vaporise and burn. Maybe we should have baked the plaster to a mush higher temp, say 600 or so, before casting to burn off all the wax within the plaster
The other option was to invest the wax,. However with some investment we have here, as soon as the wax item is removed, the investment just runs off. Sort of what you'd expect. So, to counter this, the advice was to cover the wax with shellac. However, even this is not great with the investment, which is water based, still running off.
Thoughts?
Bookmarks