
Originally Posted by
oyster
250 twin four stroke goes way back to a trackside discussion, Tony Greiving and Myself,( Peter Jones) at teretonga about 9 years ago. Streetstock was growing so fast we wondered how we'd find enough bikes. And so the learner approved 250 bike looked good, but it wasn't needed, we scoured the country and found 150's, one year about 4 a month were needed to fill the "register' with around 90 known bikes. 250 prod was hatched in 2009 when Geoff Cain and myself met the Kawasaki top brass in Auckland, they offered a deal to trial the EX250, we chose Seth Devereux as the c.... test dummy (can't use the c word) Seth was super fussy to ensure compliance, he often asked me and if I wasn't sure I referred him to the commission, Paul Stewart back then. Then the rules got firmly set, Kev Goddard on the phone and we discussed and decided matters such as wets, warmers and most importantly, could a youngster ride one. The answer was no, it not's so much the speed but the size of the bike. The Hyosung in particular far to big for a 35kg 13 year old. Seth did a great job, slugged it out with the 150's, after all, the intent was to provide an equal tech option for Streetstock , leaving an opportunity for it to "splinter off" on it's own if it became popular / effective. Now here's the (my) punchline. The next machine came along, from South Canterbury, a repaired road wreck. Straight away it was easy to see a number of rule noncompliances. It was right there and then the firm, polite but discrete "no" needed to be sounded from the club level leadership. That's how cheating should be managed, firm, discrete and as early as detected. That's the "fence" at the top of the cliff. Last year I witnessed the tech checks where many bikes failed, then they went out and rode the GP, a NZtitle race, presumably without penalty! Another rider fell off and continued riding! Someone tell I've got this all wrong, but I really worried this is not just a lack of a fence, but an invitation to flout the rules, and "see how we go". Predictably, there's now this expensive, damaging "train wreck" at the bottom of the cliff. Sorry I if I sound critical, it's just Paul Stewart, a wise man who coached me, and predicted this type of evolution. A real shame. How many views on this thread? bout 6000? That's 12000 eyes that could've spotted the little non compliant "niggles" and said something (discrete) to nip the rot in the bud. No criticism of Billie, top man doin his best. If there's blame, it's people like me, sitting on our hands, knowing the problem is coming, not acting early.
Bookmarks