DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Actually is only $8000, must be a typo. I see that Axehole(number8) has given his usual abuse to a first time poster.
Only a Rat can win a Rat Race!
To be fair, first time posters should be prohibited form buy/sell. It's pretty obnoxious joining a community for the sole purpose of selling your shit.
Thing is about old Brit nails; I can't imagine how they ever got this untouchable reputation for handling. All the frames had enormous unsupported bends in them. I was helping with a Goldie on the dyno and was surprised at the flattened framerail bottom right. That was the best bodge they could think of? And of course the suspension was cruder than a crude thing.
Maybe I missed the early Jap bikes and came in aircooled RDs and GS550s, but sheesh!
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Weeeellll.....The better brit stuff - the Nortons and goldies actually did handle pretty well. particularly compared to the early jap products.
I can only put it down to many years of developing basically the same thing to the last degree - because you couldn't afford to build anything else...
A straight Norton frame handles well - power on or off. A BSA handles well with the power on, but don't shut off....
Don't forget Dave, tyres weren't much cop so the loads going into the frame were not anywhere near what we have now.
In the early days of the Classic Register, I ran a Domiracer and took Kirby's advice on rubber. Fitted the sticky Michelins he was proddy racing on at the time.
The extra grip was - interesting....If you were trying hard, front end patter going into the Ruapuna sweeper, then power on hard and the rear weaved...
Not many years earlier my good manx on triangulars could be drifted around the same corner.
WTF 7k says he needs the money soon for his big OE, hope he's not needing it to soon!!!
http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/moto...1303765263.htm
In my totally unqualified opinion it was probably because they didn't have enough horsepower to highlite the deficiencies of their frames. MV Agusta, Honda and others reportedly had handling problems. They were using the same primitive frame technology as the Poms but their frames had to deal with a lot more ponies.
That and a somewhat unrealistic nostalgia when looking at the past through rose, white, and blue, tinted glasses.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. At 40 to fifty odd bhp the Manx and its frame seem to have been a match. The current bikes with vastly more horse power and their much more advanced frames seem matched too. (Although looking at some of those IoM video clips might make you wonder.)
I don't think it follows that four times the power could be expected to reduce the lap times to 25% of what they had been previously.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
As a rather mediocre classic racer I'm amazed how well some of them 'old nails' go.
I did swap my BMW for a few laps round Taupo on my mates Triumph T140 and the difference between a light Brit and a German touring bike was very obvious.
The BMW was called the " rubber cow" when it came out, but can't say I've ever noticed it.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.
Well technically it is 'overseas'. I was going to suggest Melbourne, I mean, I assume he has some other money, like what Dad gave him.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 18 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 18 guests)
Bookmarks