Never mind Shaun, you can do better than that mateOriginally Posted by Moto-Dynamix
Hardcore Biker
Never mind Shaun, you can do better than that mate
Forum whore
so today her parole office speaks up and says " If you accept payment from a tv station or similar to voice your oppinion we wll send you back to jail "
That alone tells me she herself is innocent and was stiched up big time, they want her to go away and say thankyou to them, arse holes, and what does the Australian goverment know that it is not talked about either after pushing for her release
No proof, just like everyone else on here, I have an arsehole
Forum whore
Never mind Shaun, you can do better than that mate
True, gave myself a lovely hand job today for valantines day
Forum whore
Here is some real factual interesting info about all this
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 1.
On 27th May 2005, Schapelle Corby was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment, after 4.2kg of marijuana was found in her boogie-board bag on arrival in Denpasar. The disturbing nature of the trial itself created a huge public outcry in her native Australia. For her appeal, her lawyer sought help directly from the Australian government.
In a letter dated 5th July 2005, the CEO of Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd (SACL), Max Moore-Wilton, told Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison, that Schapelle Corby's boogie-board bag was the only one not scanned at Sydney airport on route to Bali. Ellison wrote to AFP Commissioner Keelty the following day, 6th July 2005, conveying the same information. Both men realized how important this information was to Schapelle Corby, as she stood before an Indonesian appeal court. Indeed, Ellison even referred to its evidential importance directly in his letter. Keelty subsequently confirmed in writing that Prime Minister John Howard discussed this verbally with him, on 8th July 2005. All parties were also aware that scanning of all luggage, on all flights to Indonesia, was mandatory.
Furthermore, Schapelle Corby's lawyer asked directly about scanning, in faxed letters to Ellison dated 6th July and 11th July, just days after Ellison and Keelty had discussed the importance of this new evidence. Ellison's responses of 8th July and 13th July evaded the issue entirely.
Neither Schapelle Corby, nor the Bali court, was ever provided with this vital information. It was wilfully withheld.
In addition, Ellison had no intention of revealing the situation to Parliament. In a prepared response for the potential question “If asked whether the Australian Government is aware that Schapelle Corby’s boogie-board bag was not screened at Sydney Airport”, Ellison had pre-prepared the following evasive text: “The Australian Government is aware of comments about the screening of Ms Corby’s boogie-board bag at Sydney airport. Screening of checked baggage at the International Terminal at Sydney Airport is carried out by SACL. I understand SACL informed Ms Corby about this issue as early as October 2004. On 12th June 2005 the Minister for Justice and Customs wrote to Ms Corby’s lawyers suggesting they approach the operators of Sydney and Brisbane Airports regarding the handling of her luggage in Australia. I understand that SACL has had continued contact with Ms Corby’s lawyers about the handling of Ms Corby’s baggage. It is important to note that the screening for flights leaving Australia is undertaken for aviation security purposes. The screening process is not intended to detect drugs”.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 2.
On 8th October 2004, Schapelle Corby checked her bags in normally at Brisbane airport. There was no fuss, and no excess baggage charge.
Following her arrest in Bali, Schapelle Corby's lawyers asked directly about the weight of her bags, seeking to establish if there were any anomalies that might indicate an addition of between 4kg and 5kg, which was the approximate weight of the marijuana.
Qantas replied on 1st December 2004, providing only the total weight of her bags. It was flagrantly economical with the truth.
The weight of her bags on the Qantas system was actually 5kg overweight, which should have incurred an excess baggage charge of $175. This was exactly, and self evidently, the sort of information which Schapelle Corby’s lawyers were desperately seeking.
Again, vital and critical evidence was withheld from Schapelle Corby, her lawyer, and the Bali court. Neither Qantas, nor Ellison’s department, which was co-coordinating responses, ever divulged it.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 3.
Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison was at the heart of Schapelle Corby's desperate efforts to secure forensic testing. In a bizarre sequence of events, the Indonesian National Police were very receptive to the general suggestion that the AFP should forensically test the marijuana. Ellison was personally informed of this by AFP briefing note 3286440.
Subsequently, Keelty visited his counterpart in Bali. However, according to the Indonesian police, no specific request for testing was forthcoming. This was also confirmed by a DFAT briefing note dated 21st December 2004.
Further, Parliament was told directly that the AFP did not have the expertise to test the marijuana, even though it had originally offered this to assist the INP, and even though a forensic expert in Australia had offered to perform the tests (again, on record). Alarmingly, Parliament was also told that the INP had rejected the request. Both these stories were entirely false.
Schapelle Corby openly pleaded for the forensic testing of her bag, and particularly, the marijuana found within. Her lawyers wrote to the Australian government, detailing a list of the specific tests required (letter dated 3rd December 2004). She directly asked the Australian consulate (consulate file note dated 4th December 2004). She asked the court repeatedly, as also recorded by DFAT file notes of February and March 2005. She pleaded with the prosecutor directly in front of the media.
However, on 24th May 2006, in a letter to a constituent, whilst inexcusably defending the burning of the primary evidence by the Indonesians, Ellison stated that, “The Bali court, on its own authority, or upon application by Ms Corby, could also authorise a request for forensic assistance. No such request was made, either by the Indonesian authorities or by Ms Corby.”
Ellison was well aware that Schapelle Corby did make such a request, repeatedly. His statement was totally and utterly false.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 4.
On 23rd August 2005, Schapelle Corby's Indonesian lawyer wrote a formal letter to Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Prime Minister John Howard, stating directly that her 20-year sentence was discriminatory in nature. He cited examples of Indonesians receiving a fraction of that time, including for offences involving hundreds of kilograms of marijuana.
The letter was not even acknowledged. Indeed, the Australian government continued to present the sentence as though it was wholly within normal parameters, and equally, continued to dismiss the clear and documented abuses at the trial itself. Numerous direct comments, by Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in particular, are on public record.
In 2012, Indonesian human rights campaigner, Arifin Wardiyanto, undertook a significant research effort, identifying dozens of marijuana-related cases via examination of the Supreme Court database. He tabulated these and demonstrated that Schapelle Corby's sentence far exceeded that of all Indonesians, not only convicted for similar amounts, but many times greater. Her sentence was at least 4x higher per kilogram of marijuana than that imposed on any Indonesian. All this information was sent to the Australian government. It was ignored.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 5.
Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison, in fact, was also at the heart of an entire series of disturbing events, all of which were extremely damaging to Schapelle Corby and her family. The three examples below were selected from many:
1) The PowderGate affair unfolded on 1st June 2005, directly after the verdict and the unprecedented 20-year sentence. In a nutshell, flour was sent to the Indonesian embassy in Sydney with a note written in Bahasa which bore no reference at all to Schapelle Corby. Immediately, the government accused supporters of Schapelle Corby of a “murderous attack”, instantly dampening public anger and support for her. However, at 6:35pm on the same day, the AFP’s national manager of intelligence sent an email to Ellison. This was marked URGENT. It was very clear. It explained in simple terms that the substance was only gram bacilli, a commonly occurring bacteria. What did Ellison do, armed with the information that this was merely one of many white-powder hoaxes, which occurred in Australia each month? Nothing. The false story was allowed to roll around the world, and syndication continued across Australia for days.
2) After the original trial, two Australian QC’s were pressed upon the Corby family by the government, in time for the appeal. Whilst it was difficult to understand how two non-Indonesian speaking lawyers could actually provide practical assistance, government ministers were forceful, with the media repeatedly citing it as significant “help”, pressuring the family further. In the middle of the appeal, one of them, Mark Trowell, fatally undermined her prospects when he made a series of unsubstantiated allegations against her defence team, accusing them of seeking funds for bribes. He offered no evidence whatsoever, even though he and the Australian government must have been well aware that this was, in fact, the modus operandi in that nation. Mark Trowell, on oath, later stated that he was working for the Australian government all along. He was a Liberal Party member, and long term friend and colleague of, Justice and Customs Minister Ellison.
3) Schapelle Corby needed every cent of revenue from her book, “My Story”. This was intended to pay for medication, food, and for an extra-ordinary legal appeal. On 8th November 2006, the AFP began a large-scale investigation and extensive surveillance operation, reporting to the Minister of Justice and Customs, Ellison. The outcome was a politically driven ‘proceeds of crime’ case, which many consider to have subverted the judiciary itself. It was held in secret, with Schapelle Corby having no representation whatsoever. Indeed, she wasn’t even aware of it, nor was any other Corby family member. It also extended Australian legal reach beyond Australian borders. The money was duly seized. Even worse, this occurred whilst Schapelle Corby was still in legal-process in Indonesia. The signal to Jakarta, that she was considered, by Canberra, to have committed a crime, could hardly have been mistaken. Schapelle Corby remains the only person in Australian history to have had book revenue seized under ‘proceeds of crime’ legislation.
These are real examples of major news stories, of enormous public interest and implication. Yet, they represent just a handful of examples from many, most of which are fully documented on The Expendable Project’s website: www.expendable.tv
The Australian mainstream media, however, has never reported any of this nor is any of the documentation proving her innocence ever mentioned.
Until Schapelle's mother wore a t-shit, on the day of Schapelle's release, with The Expendable Project website address printed across the front, the media had not even acknowledged its existence. Following this incident, Fairfax Media in particular, launched an entire series of articles abusing the website and those they linked to it, without, of course, ever explaining what it actually held.
The rest of the coverage, generally, has comprised crude smears against family members, ridiculous but damaging stories invented from nothing, a vicious campaign to press the government to seize her only form of revenue for medication, and worst of all, two attempts to have her thrown back into prison by presenting bogus breaches of parole conditions to the Indonesian authorities.
On television, Nine Network has even broadcast, twice, a terrible production which places proven lies into Schapelle Corby's mouth, by using her dead father... in Australia, dead men can't sue.
This is a campaign of smear and vilification like no other.
The facts, documented by the government itself, in its own cables and correspondence, are totally censored. Replacing them are baseless smears, prejudice, and fabrication, and a neveriending stream of articles and broadcasts designed to poison public perception, and influence events on the ground against her.
On the surface, this may sound like an absurd suggestion. But if that surface is scratched, if the facts are established and considered, the situation is undeniable.
Australians are not being served by the mainstream media, but instead, are being controlled by it. Public opinion is being formed via a diet of self-serving news management, extreme censorship, and ruthless smearing propaganda.
It is Australia, in 2014, and an innocent human being continues to be tormented.
SOURCE:
www.expendable.tv
BASED ON ORIGINAL ARTICLE:
http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=633747
Real reporting is the communication of actual events, supported by hard evidential material. It is revealing factual information, which is conclusively proven by authentic documentation.
Australia, however, does not have a free or functional media, nor apparently, a single journalist of sufficient integrity or courage to report independently or honestly. If that sounds harsh, consider the following examples.
Their implications for the nation are immense, exposing a government and establishment so corrupt, that it is prepared to sacrifice an innocent life to preserve its own self-interests. Yet, they remain unreported. In Australia, they are censored, and hidden from the public:
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 1.
On 27th May 2005, Schapelle Corby was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment, after 4.2kg of marijuana was found in her boogie-board bag on arrival in Denpasar. The disturbing nature of the trial itself created a huge public outcry in her native Australia. For her appeal, her lawyer sought help directly from the Australian government.
In a letter dated 5th July 2005, the CEO of Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd (SACL), Max Moore-Wilton, told Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison, that Schapelle Corby's boogie-board bag was the only one not scanned at Sydney airport on route to Bali. Ellison wrote to AFP Commissioner Keelty the following day, 6th July 2005, conveying the same information. Both men realized how important this information was to Schapelle Corby, as she stood before an Indonesian appeal court. Indeed, Ellison even referred to its evidential importance directly in his letter. Keelty subsequently confirmed in writing that Prime Minister John Howard discussed this verbally with him, on 8th July 2005. All parties were also aware that scanning of all luggage, on all flights to Indonesia, was mandatory.
Furthermore, Schapelle Corby's lawyer asked directly about scanning, in faxed letters to Ellison dated 6th July and 11th July, just days after Ellison and Keelty had discussed the importance of this new evidence. Ellison's responses of 8th July and 13th July evaded the issue entirely.
Neither Schapelle Corby, nor the Bali court, was ever provided with this vital information. It was wilfully withheld.
In addition, Ellison had no intention of revealing the situation to Parliament. In a prepared response for the potential question “If asked whether the Australian Government is aware that Schapelle Corby’s boogie-board bag was not screened at Sydney Airport”, Ellison had pre-prepared the following evasive text: “The Australian Government is aware of comments about the screening of Ms Corby’s boogie-board bag at Sydney airport. Screening of checked baggage at the International Terminal at Sydney Airport is carried out by SACL. I understand SACL informed Ms Corby about this issue as early as October 2004. On 12th June 2005 the Minister for Justice and Customs wrote to Ms Corby’s lawyers suggesting they approach the operators of Sydney and Brisbane Airports regarding the handling of her luggage in Australia. I understand that SACL has had continued contact with Ms Corby’s lawyers about the handling of Ms Corby’s baggage. It is important to note that the screening for flights leaving Australia is undertaken for aviation security purposes. The screening process is not intended to detect drugs”.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 2.
On 8th October 2004, Schapelle Corby checked her bags in normally at Brisbane airport. There was no fuss, and no excess baggage charge.
Following her arrest in Bali, Schapelle Corby's lawyers asked directly about the weight of her bags, seeking to establish if there were any anomalies that might indicate an addition of between 4kg and 5kg, which was the approximate weight of the marijuana.
Qantas replied on 1st December 2004, providing only the total weight of her bags. It was flagrantly economical with the truth.
The weight of her bags on the Qantas system was actually 5kg overweight, which should have incurred an excess baggage charge of $175. This was exactly, and self evidently, the sort of information which Schapelle Corby’s lawyers were desperately seeking.
Again, vital and critical evidence was withheld from Schapelle Corby, her lawyer, and the Bali court. Neither Qantas, nor Ellison’s department, which was co-coordinating responses, ever divulged it.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 3.
Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison was at the heart of Schapelle Corby's desperate efforts to secure forensic testing. In a bizarre sequence of events, the Indonesian National Police were very receptive to the general suggestion that the AFP should forensically test the marijuana. Ellison was personally informed of this by AFP briefing note 3286440.
Subsequently, Keelty visited his counterpart in Bali. However, according to the Indonesian police, no specific request for testing was forthcoming. This was also confirmed by a DFAT briefing note dated 21st December 2004.
Further, Parliament was told directly that the AFP did not have the expertise to test the marijuana, even though it had originally offered this to assist the INP, and even though a forensic expert in Australia had offered to perform the tests (again, on record). Alarmingly, Parliament was also told that the INP had rejected the request. Both these stories were entirely false.
Schapelle Corby openly pleaded for the forensic testing of her bag, and particularly, the marijuana found within. Her lawyers wrote to the Australian government, detailing a list of the specific tests required (letter dated 3rd December 2004). She directly asked the Australian consulate (consulate file note dated 4th December 2004). She asked the court repeatedly, as also recorded by DFAT file notes of February and March 2005. She pleaded with the prosecutor directly in front of the media.
However, on 24th May 2006, in a letter to a constituent, whilst inexcusably defending the burning of the primary evidence by the Indonesians, Ellison stated that, “The Bali court, on its own authority, or upon application by Ms Corby, could also authorise a request for forensic assistance. No such request was made, either by the Indonesian authorities or by Ms Corby.”
Ellison was well aware that Schapelle Corby did make such a request, repeatedly. His statement was totally and utterly false.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 4.
On 23rd August 2005, Schapelle Corby's Indonesian lawyer wrote a formal letter to Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Prime Minister John Howard, stating directly that her 20-year sentence was discriminatory in nature. He cited examples of Indonesians receiving a fraction of that time, including for offences involving hundreds of kilograms of marijuana.
The letter was not even acknowledged. Indeed, the Australian government continued to present the sentence as though it was wholly within normal parameters, and equally, continued to dismiss the clear and documented abuses at the trial itself. Numerous direct comments, by Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in particular, are on public record.
In 2012, Indonesian human rights campaigner, Arifin Wardiyanto, undertook a significant research effort, identifying dozens of marijuana-related cases via examination of the Supreme Court database. He tabulated these and demonstrated that Schapelle Corby's sentence far exceeded that of all Indonesians, not only convicted for similar amounts, but many times greater. Her sentence was at least 4x higher per kilogram of marijuana than that imposed on any Indonesian. All this information was sent to the Australian government. It was ignored.
THE UNREPORTED SCANDAL - EXAMPLE 5.
Justice and Customs Minister, Christopher Ellison, in fact, was also at the heart of an entire series of disturbing events, all of which were extremely damaging to Schapelle Corby and her family. The three examples below were selected from many:
1) The PowderGate affair unfolded on 1st June 2005, directly after the verdict and the unprecedented 20-year sentence. In a nutshell, flour was sent to the Indonesian embassy in Sydney with a note written in Bahasa which bore no reference at all to Schapelle Corby. Immediately, the government accused supporters of Schapelle Corby of a “murderous attack”, instantly dampening public anger and support for her. However, at 6:35pm on the same day, the AFP’s national manager of intelligence sent an email to Ellison. This was marked URGENT. It was very clear. It explained in simple terms that the substance was only gram bacilli, a commonly occurring bacteria. What did Ellison do, armed with the information that this was merely one of many white-powder hoaxes, which occurred in Australia each month? Nothing. The false story was allowed to roll around the world, and syndication continued across Australia for days.
2) After the original trial, two Australian QC’s were pressed upon the Corby family by the government, in time for the appeal. Whilst it was difficult to understand how two non-Indonesian speaking lawyers could actually provide practical assistance, government ministers were forceful, with the media repeatedly citing it as significant “help”, pressuring the family further. In the middle of the appeal, one of them, Mark Trowell, fatally undermined her prospects when he made a series of unsubstantiated allegations against her defence team, accusing them of seeking funds for bribes. He offered no evidence whatsoever, even though he and the Australian government must have been well aware that this was, in fact, the modus operandi in that nation. Mark Trowell, on oath, later stated that he was working for the Australian government all along. He was a Liberal Party member, and long term friend and colleague of, Justice and Customs Minister Ellison.
3) Schapelle Corby needed every cent of revenue from her book, “My Story”. This was intended to pay for medication, food, and for an extra-ordinary legal appeal. On 8th November 2006, the AFP began a large-scale investigation and extensive surveillance operation, reporting to the Minister of Justice and Customs, Ellison. The outcome was a politically driven ‘proceeds of crime’ case, which many consider to have subverted the judiciary itself. It was held in secret, with Schapelle Corby having no representation whatsoever. Indeed, she wasn’t even aware of it, nor was any other Corby family member. It also extended Australian legal reach beyond Australian borders. The money was duly seized. Even worse, this occurred whilst Schapelle Corby was still in legal-process in Indonesia. The signal to Jakarta, that she was considered, by Canberra, to have committed a crime, could hardly have been mistaken. Schapelle Corby remains the only person in Australian history to have had book revenue seized under ‘proceeds of crime’ legislation.
These are real examples of major news stories, of enormous public interest and implication. Yet, they represent just a handful of examples from many, most of which are fully documented on The Expendable Project’s website: www.expendable.tv
The Australian mainstream media, however, has never reported any of this nor is any of the documentation proving her innocence ever mentioned.
Until Schapelle's mother wore a t-shit, on the day of Schapelle's release, with The Expendable Project website address printed across the front, the media had not even acknowledged its existence. Following this incident, Fairfax Media in particular, launched an entire series of articles abusing the website and those they linked to it, without, of course, ever explaining what it actually held.
The rest of the coverage, generally, has comprised crude smears against family members, ridiculous but damaging stories invented from nothing, a vicious campaign to press the government to seize her only form of revenue for medication, and worst of all, two attempts to have her thrown back into prison by presenting bogus breaches of parole conditions to the Indonesian authorities.
On television, Nine Network has even broadcast, twice, a terrible production which places proven lies into Schapelle Corby's mouth, by using her dead father... in Australia, dead men can't sue.
This is a campaign of smear and vilification like no other.
The facts, documented by the government itself, in its own cables and correspondence, are totally censored. Replacing them are baseless smears, prejudice, and fabrication, and a neveriending stream of articles and broadcasts designed to poison public perception, and influence events on the ground against her.
On the surface, this may sound like an absurd suggestion. But if that surface is scratched, if the facts are established and considered, the situation is undeniable.
Australians are not being served by the mainstream media, but instead, are being controlled by it. Public opinion is being formed via a diet of self-serving news management, extreme censorship, and ruthless smearing propaganda.
It is Australia, in 2014, and an innocent human being continues to be tormented.
SOURCE:
www.expendable.tv
Ta
Quite the read.
If even half of it's true, it paints a very grim picture.
What would the motivation be for the Australian government, to be such cunts?
Thousands of Australians go to Bali every year. It's a large part of the economy over there. But I can't see a gain for Oz either way in this case.
Forum whore
I'm buggered if I know man, but all you just read is documented obviously and quite dam scarry to read actually. Could it be a case of throwing some one into the slaughter house to try and scare of other traffickers? I Know that is really clutching at straws.
Also on the day she dept OZ, there was some king of opperation going down in the airport she dept from, Could it be a case of people in the customs dept being drug IMPORTERS and had to get rid of the product asap to not blow there cover in there of what was going down? as they would have been fully aware of the programme going on in there airport on that day!
I am now thinking it was not a case of she personally being set up, just wrong place at the wrong time, and the fact that the family name had a reputation made it look even better when the product was found, and stopped the Australian government and police and customs researching it all 100% proffessionaly.
How could the OZ government possibly say, " O shit, it turns out our customs or airport management team were actually using there position to import drugs.
Again, why the F---- would ya take POT to Bali, and I do not accept some of the replies on here, ie, too supply other forigners, there is just not enough money in that to risk your life in that country, and she has a reasnable brain.
Where is Kim Dot Con when ya need his skills
Hardcore Biker
so you woke up with a stiffy this morning eh Shaun.......bit more light reading for ya
http://www.theage.com.au/national/co...0712-3e6h.html
***** POLITICIANS *****
People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting
*******KASPA*******
Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes
Forum whore
being healthy, I do every day, now I will read your link--------
Strated to read it but but but, a convicted drug trafficer says what to who when and why?????
Get off the grass sport
Had to go back and finish reading it, this is the best bit of it
" I had to speak up, as I wanted to sleep better at night" Fukin soft cock, he meant to say
"I had to speak up as I am now a PAID NARK!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Shaun Harris; 15th February 2014 at 08:58.
Hardcore Biker
i think you missed the point mate which was there is definetly a market amongst the hordes of aussies ,kiwis and other travellers and expats for the product that ya girl was caught with.........just to answer your question of why would you take pot to bali...........as you were......oh...and please wash ya hands before replying
***** POLITICIANS *****
People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting
*******KASPA*******
Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes
Forum whore
washed em! and point taken but
So a pound costs say $3500.00 x that by say 4 as said by the nark = $14.000 K x 4 = $56.0000
Who the hech would risk death for that pittance dude, sorry man, your post details have come from a convicted drug trafficer who I am confident is now a nark.
Forum whore
I'm not taking a side in this ridiculous debate, but your logic is pretty weak there. People have risked death for A LOT less than that.
Forum whore
move on then, ya do not have to reply
Hardcore Biker
she had 9+ pounds on her .............by my reckoning thats an $80,000 payout even if you only double the "going rate" say 250 /Oz to $500...........80 grand would go a long way in Bali
a bit more reading for ya
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/mer...-1111116212772
remember mercedes already lived in Bali at the time.........maybe this is why she is so vocal and over the top when talking of schapelle..........guilt...just sayin
***** POLITICIANS *****
People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting
*******KASPA*******
Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes
Forum whore
I see where you are coming from with these links but
It is kind of like saying I AM A DRUG dealer as I know known marujuana dealers that have been convicted
My comment above is actually quite serious and funny, as I have proof ofa man telling a motorcycle manufacturer rep here years ago that I WAS a Drug dealer hahahahaha, ( And his wife told a friend in the office the same thing) funny how things can be over heard in an open office lay out plan. One day it will come back on him. Test me any day any time 24/7 I said, and signed the contract!
Hardcore Biker
does anyone know if schapelle has ever or offered to do a Lie Detector test...........i know they may not be reliable but surely if she was innocent she would be keen to try and prove that any way possible
***** POLITICIANS *****
People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting
*******KASPA*******
Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Call 0223210319--AKA Shaun
Bookmarks