For 30k I could purchase a superbike race the entire winter series, win and then the entire national series and get top 10. If there was a limit on tyres I think possibly do even better than top 10 on that budget. The second season could be done for 15 - 20k.
Billy, given that MNZ is a democratic organisation, why do we have this step?
I could imagine this step for removal of duplicates etc, but shouldn't the voting public (ie the members, who JT has told me numerous times now ARE MNZ) get to see these, good and bad? One may be a bad suggestion as it stands, but it may go from sow's ear to silk purse with thought from someone else. The sort of process that the MNZ conference used to provide.
Serious question, not taking the piss or trying to be sarcastic or pointed.
"more than two strokes is masturbation"
www.motoparts-online.com
Good question,
That is how it was operating when I took over and I have continued on as it was,In most cases,They do just go straight up on the website for submissions from the members,But there are times when if I'm not sure or I have a conflict of interest,I will move it on for others for advice,Very seldom do they not go straight up,The only reason I have pushed this a bit earlier this year is because the date for having them on the website coincides with the last 2 rounds of NZSBK and it was a bit of a scramble last year and some folks missed out because they hadn't been aware of the deadlines,This year I have been more proactive with getting it out there AND in particular to those that missed out last year.
A good example of this is,This year I have a club from the South Island who want to make some changes to both Classic and Post classics,But I will run these past two relevant associations first.Hope this clears it up in some way for you.
No in some ways it makes it even murkier....there is no reason in my view to do what you are suggesting. Do you run any changes to the Nat regs past every club which runs a round ? Neither of the two associations you refer to are national ones despite their titles... Put the suggested changes up on the website for comment and modification AS RECEIVED and get the reaction direct from the people concerned.
If you also want to put up any official comment from the clubs concerned, fine it will tell the members what their voted in committee think.
That is how it was set up when I received the poisoned chalice too, has been the established procedure for YEARS now ........
Just make sure your "suggestions" are FULLY thought through, and are applicable for the whole country, not just a small self-interest group in your particular corner of it ....... as Billy will attest, sometimes what IS a good idea locally is a clusterhoohah when applied Nationally![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks