Fuken science pricks and shit

[bogan]

... go get a hardon elsewhere.

Strike a nerve did I?

[mashman]

Strike a nerve did I?

Like I said, go get a hardon elsewhere

[bogan]

Like I said, go get a hardon elsewhere

Lol, telling someone to fuck off cos you don't like their reasoned opinion is a bit hypocritical wouldn't you say?

[Akzle]

well. At least 3 people agree with me. So i must be on to something...
The more followers i have, the righter i am, yeah?

[mashman]

Lol, telling someone to fuck off cos you don't like their reasoned opinion is a bit hypocritical wouldn't you say?

Who says I didn't like/agree with your opinion? Keep making shit up though, it's highly entertaining.

[bogan]

well. At least 3 people agree with me. So i must be on to something...
The more followers i have, the righter i am, yeah?

Sort of, the peer review process is to ensure you have taken due diligence with your research so it is not misleading or otherwise flawed. This allows people who read it to build upon the sciency stuff in their own work, or see how the conclusions were reached and become more educated themselves.

[mashman]

well. At least 3 people agree with me. So i must be on to something...
The more followers i have, the righter i am, yeah?

Well you need sheeple in order to lead, so you're defo on to something there.......... master.

[bogan]

Who says I didn't like/agree with your opinion? Keep making shit up though, it's highly entertaining.

You know what would actually be entertaining? If you could hold a reasoned discussion.

[mashman]

You know what would actually be entertaining? If you could hold a reasoned discussion.

I fail to see where I was being unreasonable. You're the one that threw bias into the equation by deciding that my motives were driven by anything other than reason. At that point we enter into bogan fantasy land and I just ain't gonna stroke that thing for ya. Reasoned discussion, that's fuckin priceless.

[bogan]

I fail to see where I was being unreasonable. You're the one that threw bias into the equation by deciding that my motives were driven by anything other than reason. At that point we enter into bogan fantasy land and I just ain't gonna stroke that thing for ya. Reasoned discussion, that's fuckin priceless.

The mythical anti-brigade is where you diverged from logic. The name of which suggests a lot of bias, feel free to resume the discussion from that point, instead of telling me to fuck off.

Oh, and if you want evidence of your bias "farkin (govt) scientific community" says it all really

[mashman]

The mythical anti-brigade is where you diverged from logic. The name of which suggests a lot of bias, feel free to resume the discussion from that point, instead of telling me to fuck off.

Oh, and if you want evidence of your bias "farkin (govt) scientific community" says it all really

Is that "experts" from both sides working side by side, funded equally and open minded? Or is that govt approved "experts" only?

So not the anti brigade and their research? Where's my bias? especially as I require both pro and anti to come to conclusions by reviewing each others findings and not the bias of only "accepted experts".

There is no mythical anti-brigade, they are very real. They are "experts" who have looked at the issue of fluoridation from many view points and understand that fluoride can pose a potential health danger. So as I said earlier, there's pro and anti fluoridation sides of the argument, both "expert" in their opinion. If you want to deny their existence, then indeed by all means fuck off. Ok? I want an answer, not guesswork... and until then, the anti brigade have my "vote".

It's not a bias, it's a reasoned conclusion. Quite simply I don't trust any agency that would allow a substance to be put into the water that hasn't been fully researched. Given that this comes under the remit of the govt, then they get the mention. But by all means read it as an unfounded bias, coz that's all you seem to be looking for.

[bogan]

There is no mythical anti-brigade, they are very real. They are "experts" who have looked at the issue of fluoridation from many view points and understand that fluoride can pose a potential health danger. So as I said earlier, there's pro and anti fluoridation sides of the argument, both "expert" in their opinion. If you want to deny their existence, then indeed by all means fuck off. Ok? I want an answer, not guesswork... and until then, the anti brigade have my "vote".

It's not a bias, it's a reasoned conclusion. Quite simply I don't trust any agency that would allow a substance to be put into the water that hasn't been fully researched. Given that this comes under the remit of the govt, then they get the mention. But by all means read it as an unfounded bias, coz that's all you seem to be looking for.

Ok, so they too are scientists with every right to go through the peer reviewed process and publish their findings, so they are most certainly included in (and in fact required by) the process. It begs the question though, why haven't they?

The scientific community is not part of the government, the govt takes their findings and makes a decision. There is not some evil bias (govt or otherwise) in the scientific community, so stop trying to insinuate there is, instead explain why those experts who are sure fluoride poses a hazard have been unable to prove it?

[Woodman]

so, havard and shit have done a study. NOW (as opposed to before science), flouride is a neuro development inhibiting fuken thing, ie makes people stupid. (and docile and easy to police/control)

Who'd have thought.

Im looking at you, auckland.

So is THC so maybe you should lay off that and just drink water. Same fucken result.

[Akzle]

So is THC so maybe you should lay off that and just drink water. Same fucken result.

educate yourself.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/p...essional/page4

[Woodman]

educate yourself.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/p...essional/page4

Who the fuck was talking about cancer???.

Your post was about flouride making people stupid and docile and easy to manage.

Ironic really.