Fuken science pricks and shit

[Ulsterkiwi]

educate yourself.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/p...essional/page4

have you heard of the series of case studies where they placed a cannula into the brain of people with endstage GBM (advanced brain cancer)? By means of that they put pretty hefty doses of cannabis directly into their tumours. The tumours regressed (shrank) for a period of time. The patients were high as.....clearly.... and did eventually die sadly. Not sure if the people who did that ever followed up on it. Point is that article makes reference to lots of animal model work but trials in people have happened too.

[Akzle]

and this is precisely the point. Science is not precise, thats a myth propogated by the media.

ulster, meet irony.

[Bass]

You are all missing the point completely!
Fluoride isn't the enemy - Oxygen is. No, seriously! (sort of)
Consider this: -
Respiration (and by that I mean the chemical reaction where sugar combines with oxygen to release water, carbon dioxide and energy) powers us all. It is a complex multistage reaction and one of those stages releases free radicals. Free radicals are incredibly reactive. They will react with almost anything and their lifetime is measures in microseconds.
One of the things they react with is your DNA and they damage it progressively so that it doesn't reproduce accurately. The major symptom of this is aging.

Yep, breathing oxygen causes you to age and if nothing else gets you first, oxygen will.

So if you want to live forever, stop breathing.

Oops, hang on a minute.................




Personally, i think this proves that God (or whatever) has a sense of humour

[mashman]

"As efficient as this type of propulsion may sound, it defies one of the fundamental concepts of physics - the conservation of momentum, which states that for something to be propelled forward, some kind of propellant needs to be pushed out in the opposite direction.

For that reason, the drive was widely laughed at and ignored when it was invented by English researcher Roger Shawyer in the early 2000s."

Science pricks!

[oldrider]

"As efficient as this type of propulsion may sound, it defies one of the fundamental concepts of physics - the conservation of momentum, which states that for something to be propelled forward, some kind of propellant needs to be pushed out in the opposite direction.

For that reason, the drive was widely laughed at and ignored when it was invented by English researcher Roger Shawyer in the early 2000s."

Science pricks!

Further explanations of Emdrive by Roger Sawyer - fascinating stuff: https://vimeo.com/channels/Emdrive

[pzkpfw]

Direct Thrust Measurement of an EM Drive and Evaluation of Possible Side-Effects
M.Tajmar and G. Fiedler

http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2015-4083

... Our test campaign can not confirm or refute the claims of the EMDrive but intends to independently assess possible side-effects in the measurements ...

It's a bit soon to get too excited by this.

[Scuba_Steve]

After years of research & millions of dollars, engineers can accurately replicate two drunk people carrying a sofa

[husaberg]

I love just how gullable you critters are.
None of you likely read the study.
Yet your agenda based sites sheeped you guys into thinking it was proof that you so longed for Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491930/

If you had (and could actually read) you will see that the study compared children in areas with recommended levels of fluoride in water the same levels that are introduced in the process of water fluoridation (0.5 to 1.5 mg/L)
It compares this to children in areas with high fluoride levels (above 1.5 mg/L).
This paper documents the risks of chronic fluoride toxicity, not water fluoridation.

As for the mind control if they wanted to control your minds (assuming you had one) just legalise weed. As that's one of the CIA tested and proven mind control drugs.

TD – Strong Cannabis
TD, or truth drug, is extracted from the cannabis plant and injected into food or cigarettes. As the name suggests, it muffles any sense of prudence so that users talk without caution. And just like its marijuana sister, interviewees sink into a state of mirth and are so happy they're willing to talk on just about anything.

If you wanted to exert some level of mind control via manipulation of free will over a large population you simply just limit their protein and increase sugar intakes.

[mashman]

http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2015-4083

It's a bit soon to get too excited by this.

No, German Scientists Have Not Confirmed the “Impossible” EMDrive... accompanied the one I posted earlier .

[R650R]

When is a large acid spill across a busy STATE HIGHWAY and major cyclelane route (the scenic off road one) and close to popular beach fishing spot only worth local news coverage? When is the acid involved not named in news report, useless local reporting aside even a junior newbie snowflake reporter would know to ask the name....

Probably when you don't want the public to realise the shit in their water is a toxic chemical that is not harmless.... Funny they mention its not explosive or flammable but no mention of toxicity at all.....

Well going out on a limb here pretty sure its probably Hydroflourosilic acid, the precursor to one of the three types of fluoride we poison our water with.... Flouride is a toxic byproduct of fertilizer and aluminium production that is too toxic to dump so many years ago the colgate family suckered people into having it in their toothpaste... The stack mentioned is huge steam emitter, pretty sure its a water scrubber type thing to reduce fluoride emmisions into local environment which has been news before as local orchardists complian about effects on their crops in local newspaper articles.
The article is bit contradictory but you get that with a coverup... "Large quantities of a dried product had spilled on the road "......"There was a small amount of liquid emitted from that stack ".....

Hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-ba...ectid=12061366

[Viking01]

I wouldn't go too far out on that limb if I was you ..... 8-)

The superphosphate plant at Awatoto uses the Contact process in
superphosphate manufacture, and they generate their own sulphuric
acid for use in the process. Hence the large piles of yellow (or grey)
sulphur sitting on the land to the south of the plant.

Having briefly worked in the labs at the plant back in the 1970's
(anlysing for mercury and cadmium) - and having seen the plant
configuration up close (before working as a chemical engineer),
I suspect that the "spill" (most likely liquid carry-over via the
stacks) involved only sulphuric acid.

Yes, you'll often see steam being generated (from the acid making
process). And the water scrubbers are to reduce the carry-over of
acid, dust and impurities to the wider environment.

I wouldn't be surprised to see such an event again in the future
on occasion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_process

Cheers,
Viking

[R650R]

Cheers Viking... sounds plausible... although my previous research suggests fluoride is still a byproduct somewhere and local apple orchards had elevated levels in previous news years ago...

[Viking01]

Cheers Viking... sounds plausible... although my previous research suggests fluoride is still a byproduct somewhere and local apple orchards had elevated levels in previous news years ago...

Plausible is fine. I'm OK with "plausible"..... 8-)

1. Superphosphate Manufacture

Rock phosphate is typically combined with the sulphuric acid
mentioned in order to create "single" superphosphate. [ "Triple"
superphosphate uses a phosphoric acid process in contrast ]

Know that one form of rock phosphate - fluoro-apatite - contains
a fluoride ion within its chemical structure : Ca5(P04)3 F.

But I have no idea from where the manufacturer (Ravensdown)
sources its rock phosphate feedstock. And whether fluoro-apatite
is present.

So, quite apart from traces of heavy metals (e.g. cadmium, mercury,
lead), it is possible that there might be trace amounts of fluoride
within the finished superphosphate product.

Pages 1 and 2 of the following link have some fairly readable info
if you're interested:

http://slwater.iwmi.org/sites/defaul...ith%202009.pdf


2. Orchards

As for the presence of fluoride within orchards, I couldn't comment.

Especially if there is no mention whether soil or water samples were
being discussed at the time.


3. Water Treatment

From what I found (from doing a quick online search after your post),
think that hydrofluorosilic acid will be used in urban water treatment.

But the additive used in urban water treatment can vary between region
and operator.

From an online search for our local (Wellington) water supply, there
is mention of the types of chemical used in fluoridation (either sodium
fluorosilicate or sodium fluoride)

https://wellingtonwater.co.nz/your-w...ater/fluoride/
https://wellingtonwater.co.nz/your-w...ysis-te-marua/

But I see that for Hastings, Napier and Flaxmere, the operator uses
hydrofluorosilic acid (H2 SiF6) as the additive.


I won't get involved in a discussion on the benefits (or otherwise)
of adding fluoride to an urban water supply.

Cheers,
Viking