Watch the news - B777 missing

[Crasherfromwayback]

What if the particle board was lined with thermite......???

If it tastes as bad as marmite, I could see how it would crumble......

Can you answer post 823 for me please?

[Katman]

And here's NIST showing they don't understand the concept of freefall.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGMvnwjUizY

[scrivy]

Dunno if this has been asked before...but if not, here you go. It would seem that Russia and China (the biggies) and many more countries hate the good old US of A. If the whole twin towers and building 7 thing was bullshit...wouldn't China's and Russia's top scientists/engineers etc etc all be slinging shit at the US of A to make them look bad? Has this ever happened? If not...why not?

Sorry mate, I'm not qualified to answer that question of yours.
However, I assume its along the same lines of Aussie, China, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, US etc etc not liasing or providing more details of the missing MH370...... when they all had primary radar capabilities or over the horizon radar etc..... None have been forthcoming and sharing their tech secrets have they?

Also, why were the biggies not forthcoming with the alleged weapons of mass destruction that never eventuated either???? They were silent about that too weren't they?

All playing the game of NWO I assume...???

Like I said, fucked if I know.

[bogan]

So if it converted to copious amounts of heat, how could there be people standing in the open 'wounds' of the building waving for help? And why did the towers last as long as they did before they fell down??

Burn rate; basically, the planes had enough energy in them to complete the structural destabilisation and subsequent destruction of both towers. Now we could debate for days on the technicalities of whether that is exactly what happened; but it seems irrelevant if you have building number 7 as a smoking gun evidence. Which if you do, you should be able to point out what the excuse for it falling was supposed to be, why it didn't occur, and why it had to be knocked down; as well as proof that explosives did it

[Brian d marge]

Sorry to disappoint you there dude.
I do understand that there are bad things that happen for pathetic reasons. I certainly don't need conspiracies to reassure myself of a higher power. I for one do not believe in any higher power at all. Period.
I certainly don't buy into the belief that there are random terrorists doing shit because they can. Most events on the world stage have been known to be fabricated by governments, hellbent on trying to persuade their citizens to believe in their strategies and objectives.

...and I certainly do not believe in chem trails..........

I simply don't take the governments spiel as truth.

As an example - look at the Campbell live episode about the GCSB last week - Key was infact a lying c@nt! and has now been caught out!
That is what I am referring to. Bullshit excuses and no accountability from those in power.
No nut job present here....

I agree , I dont go around worrying about it , but I am prepared ( not for a mad a-rab attack) for an earthquake or tsunami BOTH are a VERY real possiblity here .

As part of getting prepared , along the way I discovered minamalist camping , archery and beer making and also gardening All of which i didnt really know about and now enjoy

Now when I first arrived in NZ back in the 70s it was a great place , but when I returned in 91 it had REALLY changed ( just returned from another visit and american food values have taken its toll)

not conspiricy ......just weak governments , ill informed people and pressure and marketing by large corporates

As for the Twin towers , roughly 10 Tj COULD have been released IF ALL the fuel vapourised in an instant , thats roughly the same energy as the international space station hitting the tower

but low carbon steel will yield then have a large plastic period before *snapping* and that changes if you add heat

you didnt even see that type of failure in Hiroshima which had an instant energy release of ovew 60 TJ


Stephen




Dem da facts them are.

[Kickaha]

Hang about, one of those 'witnesses' contradicts the official south corridor of the planes flightpath....

OMIGOD, you've just proved the conspiracy because that "one" eyewitness you've mentioned that contradicts all the others must be the only one that isn't a Goverment plant and must be totally reliable

[Katman]

....but it seems irrelevant if you have building number 7 as a smoking gun evidence. Which if you do, you should be able to point out what the excuse for it falling was supposed to be, why it didn't occur, and why it had to be knocked down; as well as proof that explosives did it

You should have a really good read of this page.

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed...not-inside-job

[Ocean1]

Burn rate; basically, the planes had enough energy in them to complete the structural destabilisation and subsequent destruction of both towers. Now we could debate for days on the technicalities of whether that is exactly what happened; but it seems irrelevant if you have building number 7 as a smoking gun evidence. Which if you do, you should be able to point out what the excuse for it falling was supposed to be, why it didn't occur, and why it had to be knocked down; as well as proof that explosives did it

And exactly how impossibly huge is the coincidence that it was destroyed immediately after the towers were, having been planed at least weeks beforehand, from a completely different cause.

[Ocean1]

Well that would depend on whether you buy the official story of the collapse of Building 7.

No it doesn't. Only an idiot would point to agreement between a govt and their advisors as proof of complicity in a conspiracy.

I don't think the government accepted NIST's advice.

I think they told NIST what NIST's advice would be.

And that depends on your belief that there was a conspiracy. Perfect circular logic.

[Katman]

No it doesn't. Only an idiot would point to agreement between a govt and their advisors as proof of complicity in a conspiracy.

But any agreement between a government and their advisors can hardly be considered as totally impartial.

[scrivy]

You mean the office fires on ten stories of the building that burned for 7 hours?

So using that analogy, why didn't building 6 come down after it lost its entire centre?

[scrivy]

How does one explain the 5 Israelis filming the event and dancing with joy??
How did they know it was going to happen.....???

Why was their van packed with explosives?
Why were they allowed to leave the US?

[R650R]

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology...ectid=11263878

[oldrider]

How does one explain the 5 Israelis filming the event and dancing with joy??
How did they know it was going to happen.....???

Why was their van packed with explosives?
Why were they allowed to leave the US?

Who benefited most out of the war on terror? And why is it that when Israel says jump ... America asks how high? Real conspiracy material!

[scrivy]

Anyhoo.... back on track.....

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/10...from-black-box

Well there's a fucken surprise I didn't see coming......

Didn't the Chinese also detect a 'ping' that was unrelated to the others detection???

How could the pros get it so wrong??

Diversion anyone??? (No, I'm not saying its a conspiracy...... fuck yas)