per the ipca website
"Most complaints to the
Authority are referred to the
Police for investigation and
resolution. The Authority
independently oversees Police
handling of these complaints. The form of that oversight
depends on the nature of the
complaint, but can include
independent review or audit of
the Police investigation."
translate
"we warn the cops shit may hit the fan so they can hide as much evidence as need, then they write out a nice bullshit report, affifavits, tell all the boys the "real" story and surprise fucking surprise, you loose"
just F your I.
Fuck me - you and a few others here complain because boy racers don't obey the laws .... and then you support another group who flagrantly believe they have the authority to break the law ???
Don't you think that a little more consistency on the part of people who want the laws obeyed might go some way to helping the situation?
(Or I have I given you too many big words and deeper concepts than you can cope with?)
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
So what was it exactly that triggered the cops to close the road? Burnouts? 'some disorder'?
Is it illegal to have a gathering like that without some kind of notice or permit?
I suppose the police cant win really, if they do nothing one section of the community is up in arms, they go the other way and this is what happens.
So is there a 'right way' for the police to respond to events like this?
Life is not measured by how many breaths you take, but how many times you have your breath taken away
the right way would be to deal with each individual in a manner befitting that individuals behaviour...
But when you have 200 cars with updwards of 300 people and the police are probably outnumbered 6 -1, this is impossible to do.
I see the police side of when things like this happen - with large crowds, the police know that they could easily loose control unless they act overly aggressive to maintain control - kinda like shock and awe
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
or, they could change the attitude of the institution so it was less "us vs them",
they could ignore BS laws that noone really wants, they could butt-secks some politicians more often, they could weed out all the kids that got bullied at school and the old boys that jack their mates off at the golf club and become a professional PEACE enforcement unit, rather than mindlessly and needlessly enforcing crown policy to keep lawerjews and jewdges paid.
but naaaaaah. force and threats of violence, that's a surefire way to get kiwis to comply.
But "they" who call the police for help which is about 99% of population expects "them" 0.5% cops to deal the unruly 0.5% "us".
The whole modern system of justice and law enforcement is a game anyway operating under a more confused set of ever changing rules than the Americas cup.
People misbehaving here get off very lightly compared to other nations.
Just look at cop show on telly last night with that party in howick, huge turnout of cops, heaps of pissheads smashing bottles on road and fighting, going through peoples properties and only one arrested who was released next day anyway. Then the tenant comes on tv saying its not the first party and wont be the last.
We've had the same dispersal of mobile riots in our suburb, to say we are toughly policed or some kind of police state is ridiculous.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Oh bugger it.
Generally I support the police because they have a prick of a job - we don't talk about the cheerless domestic disputes they attend and other awful stuff (child abuse etc).
But breaching fundamental rights - that is a no-go.
Big ups to the PCA for making this call.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks