True but even after the loans are down to manageable levels, if there is a family to protect then income insurance makes good sense.
Especially if ACC decide to recategorise a person and their life's career is gone.
Just sayin.
Maybe. I've started again several times, never had the benefit of income insurance beyond that first small mortgage cover. Never had hungry kids.
The thing about every sort of insurance is that it's never as cheap as covering the same risk from your own pocket. Except where the govt mess with the rules, as with ACC. So it makes sense to acquire the means to cover any reasonable eventuality yourself as early as possible and then tell the insurance companies fuck.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
I recently received my 1st infringement for an "on hold license" bike in 3 years.3 previous stops were either not noticed or let off with a "get it licensed warning".
This time the "on hold had expired" and the bike was unlicensed.(unintentionally).
Fine was $100 still way ahead of the fuckers.
Went on line and put it on hold again - no problems.
btw. I looked at the statute and it seems that riding unlicensed has the least penalties.
Less than riding while on hold (exempt) or riding unregistered.
I highly recommend it.
Better than the Kiwi Way - bend over and let them fuck you.
True story, you just got extorted... It's almost impossible to ride unlicensed [vehicle] nowadays; continuous licensing means the licence is continuous, when you pay is irrelevant the licence runs from the end of the last there's no escaping it aside from exemption which has it's own offence or unlicensed which again has it's own offence.
It's residual from when vehicles didn't have continuous licences & is just used to illegally scam/extort $$$ from people today
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
Unfortunately their agenda is working through slowly grinding down the individual rider. How many here can just go out and slap on a years rego without thinking about it?. I face retirement in a couple of years and I wonder if I am going to be able to continue owning a bike.
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
Yep I know what you feel - first time (in the last year) I've had bike / bikes "on hold". Next winter / cold period will look at registering bike / bikes on a daily basis
stuff the effing ACC system. If anything they are doing themselves out of adding to the 3-4 billion they already have in their account.
Still think people not registering at all are tossers
Quote Jan 2020 Posted by Katman
Life would be so much easier if you addressed questions with a simple answer.
ACC levy should be paid on licence type held not on the vehicle.
Your either licenced or not.
No multi ownership penalty.
Don't want ride bike in winter don't hold licence during that time.
Make the vehicle licence renewable 3/6/9/12months with no need put it on hold just don't ride/drive without a current licence.
Introduce scooter licence so they pay to ride one.
I don't see why one person with 5 vehicles should pay tax 5 times to use the same road for the same potential total kms as a single vehicle owner.
I don't see why a licenced rider can borrow a bike/car without having contributed.
Abolish registration altogether and add the other costs into the fuel type for roads repairs.
Lets face it a single vehicle owner doing 20tho a year is taking the same risk as a multi vehicle owner doing 20tho.
I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.
See the problem there Mossy is common sense. What you said, we all get that. However the the plebs that make these rules don't!
Besides they really don't give a stuff if it costs us u and i more or not. We the public are simply there for pillaging more money from.
At the ned of the day Gov't depts are about one thing now.............mo money mo money mo money.
The world has changed, Gov't used to serve the people, now, the people are simply there to serve the Govt and in turn the Govt is simply there to serve big business.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(i try to get it right, but probably not: )
if what you're being sold isn't a service, you're the product...
hahaha. no. they never did.The world has changed, Gov't used to serve the people, now, the people are simply there to serve the Govt and in turn the Govt is simply there to serve big business.
WOF ya bikes, and forget about rego.
Oh, and stop whining you lot.
Govt departments don't give a toss about you. So why care about their rulings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks