Yes.
If they are interested in road safety, they'd be happy to check that people were not intoxicated before operating a motor vehicle on a public road, as they have at the same rally previously.
Over the years at different rallies it has varied between testing before you go to parking the booze bus a few hundred metres up the road and you take your chances. One is positive policing, the other is definitely negative and doesn't help public perception.
If the police can make themselves available for traffic control at public events, or spend the day at the cricket or at a rugby match to deal with the pissed punters, surely a couple of hours in the morning to keep drunks off the road is not unreasonable.
As for the WOF and rego checks on the way in, that is just revenue gathering......
Riding cheap crappy old bikes badly since 1987
Tagorama maps: Transalpers map first 100 tags..................Map of tags 101-200......................Latest map, tag # 201-->
The police & their resources are already there, its' the difference between them stopping potentially over the limit people from entering the roadways & instead advising they go back to sleep or walk somewhere for breakfast/brunch etc or making dat cash moneys for their masters
The former is positive Safety the latter is negative $$$aftey
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
Motorcyclists are not special, they don't sit in the entrance of every holiday campground in NZ testing drivers leaving - and from experience a F load of drink is consumed every night in camping grounds over summer!
Take it a bit further. Cops testing patrons as they leave every establishment that serves alcohol.
Actually with all the global attention to vehicular safety and mandatory this and that I am surprised the EU has not passed a law that all vehicles must have a testing system that will lock the engine cold if you test over the prescribed limit.
A resourcing thing perhaps? Your ideas sound good. The idea of testing happening outside any venue serving alcohol is great in theory but obviously unrealistic. Think of the carnage saved. How ever, a discrete event such as a rally is realistic for testing. As D said , a friendly pre ride check before you leave the rally, good for risk mitigation and popo/ rider relations.
I am not... I are shitting on there bosses that make the rules, from their air conditioned offices...
no.... dont be silly... just special evnts were booze licences are required...
OHHH now thats going to work well on my Itialian POS aint it...
just want to high light this quote...
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
With all the testing you would have them do you would have to get in early in the queue.
Those that gave no reading would get through fairly quickly
Those that gave an indication of alcohol would have to wait while a tube was attached to the testing device and than blow through it
And even if it came back as a pass there's still over a minute tied up in that excercise, multiply that by the number wanting to be tested in the queue and you will have a long waiting line. (The cops would have maybe six - eight devices)
How about people just taking responsibility for their drinking? And maybe buying their own tester?
It wouldn't stand up in Court as a defence if the Cop test says youre over the limit - but hey at least it would give you an indication as to how schickered you are![]()
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Good points well made...by a real osifer no less.
Oh the message has been well and truly received...WE were in bed early...no heavy drinking the night before a ride...
The point being made was the difference between this: cops who are already being paid to do a job doing it inside the rally or doing it outside the rally after people had put helmets on and and are on a road on their bikes...and therefore able to be fined.
You try and tell me; that's about positive policing or just plain old revenue gathering?
Oh and BTW... I was there... the man in blue that D spoke to had an attitude and was rude. Definitely having a bad hair day.
...it is better to live 1 day as a Tiger than 1000 years as a sheep...
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks