Kiwis fighting for Free Syrian Army, ISIS, Hezbollah, etc

[Akzle]

more importantly, so what if he was? Is there a law against being a mercenary? Fighting for what you believe in?

The whole campaign is west/jews/banks/'democracy' v. 'dem evil guys' today its 'terrorism' and 'the enemies of freedom', not long ago it was communists, azns, lutherans, pagans....
Your white society is fucking stupid.

[SMOKEU]

How do you know he's a terrorist? Or even an extremist? I've known plenty of Moslems in this country who are neither ...

How do I know? He was born and raised in a relatively civilized country, yet he still decided to choose snackbarism over being a decent human being. It's a much different scenario from those born into a terrorist infested hell hole, who are brainwashed from a young age to start snackbaring hard and often killed if they don't snackbar hard enough.

Islam has almost no respect for even basic human rights, so they're the most uncivilized people around. I don't care if other people want to believe in some vengeful deity in the sky, but if they want to kill or harm others just because they don't belive in their specific version of whatever extremist bullshit they belive in, then I do have a problem with it.

I don't have any issue with Christians, Buddhists, Hindus etc because they very rarely use violence to push their cause any more. The Sunnis and Shiites can't even decide on how to worship Allah, so they kill one another on a daily basis with suicide bombs and guns. They can fuck right out of any white country (Islam is not a white man's religion) until they've proved that they can live peacefully amongst each other, as there is no place for that barbaric behaviour in the modern world.

[SMOKEU]

Is there a law against being a mercenary? Fighting for what you believe in?

Does that give me permission to go to Israel and start bombing them just because I have a dislike for Jews? No, it doesn't.

[ellipsis]

...the one difference between a clown like him and those poor bastards who are born into it, is that he like all of us down here 10,000 miles away with our heads stuck up our 'living in paradise' arseholes, has an option. Options are really cool things to have...send the cunt out there to where reality and the options of living in some sort of paradise are so far removed that 'option' is only a concept...bet he wont be so sure of his true callings then...

[Banditbandit]

How do I know? He was born and raised in a relatively civilized country, yet he still decided to choose snackbarism over being a decent human being. It's a much different scenario from those born into a terrorist infested hell hole, who are brainwashed from a young age to start snackbaring hard and often killed if they don't snackbar hard enough.

Hang on .. He chose Islam .. that doesn't mean he chose Terrorism .. just as choosing Christianity does not mean the convert is going to go and kill dctors who perform abortions (as some Christians do) ..

Islam has almost no respect for even basic human rights, so they're the most uncivilized people around.

Oh crap .. you are tarring a whole religion just because of a few very visible crazies ...

I don't care if other people want to believe in some vengeful deity in the sky, but if they want to kill or harm others just because they don't belive in their specific version of whatever extremist bullshit they belive in, then I do have a problem with it.

I don't have any issue with Christians, Buddhists, Hindus etc because they very rarely use violence to push their cause any more.

Bwhahahaha .. what about al the Christian Troops currently fighting in the Middle East? .. they aere certainly killing people to push their cause ..

The Sunnis and Shiites can't even decide on how to worship Allah, so they kill one another on a daily basis with suicide bombs and guns. They can fuck right out of any white country (Islam is not a white man's religion) until they've proved that they can live peacefully amongst each other, as there is no place for that barbaric behaviour in the modern world.

Bwhahahaha .. neither can Catholics and Protestants .. and they've been killing each other over it for a long time too ...

[jahrasti]

more importantly, so what if he was? Is there a law against being a mercenary? Fighting for what you believe in?

The whole campaign is west/jews/banks/'democracy' v. 'dem evil guys' today its 'terrorism' and 'the enemies of freedom', not long ago it was communists, azns, lutherans, pagans....
Your white society is fucking stupid.

Wow when did colour come into it? Well actually todays baddies were also yesterday's baddies. AQT is not a new phenomenon and committed eye watering atrocities long before the merkins and friends came to play.

Well he can go, just not on a New Zealand passport.

As smokeu elluded to, muslim law can be interesting at times. For a loose example; if a married man and a female were to have an affair, the female has "tempted" the male and is held responsible. They still have public stonings in countries quite often and not the warring countries either. It is just kept away from the westerners.

but hey what would I know I am sat here in my fucking stupid white society apparently.

[Akzle]

Wow when did colour come into it? Well actually todays baddies were also yesterday's baddies. AQT is not a new phenomenon and committed eye watering atrocities long before the merkins and friends came to play.

Well he can go, just not on a New Zealand passport.

As smokeu elluded to, muslim law can be interesting at times. For a loose example; if a married man and a female were to have an affair, the female has "tempted" the male and is held responsible. They still have public stonings in countries quite often and not the warring countries either. It is just kept away from the westerners.

but hey what would I know I am sat here in my fucking stupid white society apparently.

what would you know, indeed.

Did you know that in your great advanced (over vaginarisated) society a woman cant be charged with rape?
That 'male assaults female' is at the top of the heirachy and 'female assaults male' almost never gets prosecuted?
So much for fuken equal rights, huh white guy?

Youve been raised to think jews need pity/money, women have rights, and that anyone who disagrees is a terrorist. Youre doing swimmingly.

[Akzle]

there is no place for that barbaric behaviour in the modern world.

shall i mention guantanamo bay?
What have you achieved in the last 15 years? Asides from progressing from primary through high school?
Cos thats how long CIVILIANS have been detained and tortured ON ABSOLUTELY NO CHARGE.
But wait. They arab, so they must be terrorists, right?
Or, thats america, nothing to do with judeo-christianity, theyre just dishing out .freedom?
Im highly surprised you take the jew/imf side, even on this one.
Contrary to your belief, islam is open to anyone, even white cunts. (also, this kid was brown, not white, so please, are brown people allowed islam?)

[Banditbandit]

but hey what would I know I am sat here in my fucking stupid white society apparently.

Who the fuck told you you had a "stupid white society" ????

[jahrasti]

what would you know, indeed.

Did you know that in your great advanced (over vaginarisated) society a woman cant be charged with rape?
That 'male assaults female' is at the top of the heirachy and 'female assaults male' almost never gets prosecuted?
So much for fuken equal rights, huh white guy?

Youve been raised to think jews need pity/money, women have rights, and that anyone who disagrees is a terrorist. Youre doing swimmingly.

Oh poor axel you are slipping today and also only telling half truths, are you the Labour leader by any chance?

Yes you are right a female can't be charged with rape (unless surgically altered) as by definition rape; person A's penis penetrates person B's genetalia.

oh dam how will I sleep tonight I have let myself down and also apparently also according to axel my jew friends

But wait readers there's more, what is it you ask............. Unlawful sexual connection. This not very new charge encompasses basically every other type of sexual assault as "rape" has such a narrow definition. It includes but not limited to digital penetration, anal and same sex. It also carries the same penalty as "rape". Now Axel I know there are words you may not understand so if need be I will write a "dumbass" version just for you.

Now onto Male Assaults Female (MAF) V Assault by a female (Assault). Yes MAF has a higher penalty (2 years V 1 year) and if domestic violence wasn't so prevalent then maybe we wouldn't have it.

Why doesn't it get prosecuted as much as you claim? well thats a number of things including the fact that the male may not want a prosecution in the first place or she used a weapon and as such a higher charge is laid.

I would suggest that it is pretty equal rights, but hey you apparently know better.

I would like us to be friends though

[jahrasti]

Who the fuck told you you had a "stupid white society" ????

My friend Axel did, we are bro's for life.

[Akzle]

Oh poor axel you are slipping today and also only telling half truths, are you the Labour leader by any chance?

Yes you are right a female can't be charged with rape (unless surgically altered) as by definition rape; person A's penis penetrates person B's genetalia.

oh dam how will I sleep tonight I have let myself down and also apparently also according to axel my jew friends

But wait readers there's more, what is it you ask............. Unlawful sexual connection. This not very new charge encompasses basically every other type of sexual assault as "rape" has such a narrow definition. It includes but not limited to digital penetration, anal and same sex. It also carries the same penalty as "rape". Now Axel I know there are words you may not understand so if need be I will write a "dumbass" version just for you.

Now onto Male Assaults Female (MAF) V Assault by a female (Assault). Yes MAF has a higher penalty (2 years V 1 year) and if domestic violence wasn't so prevalent then maybe we wouldn't have it.



I would suggest that it is pretty equal rights, but hey you apparently know better.

I would like us to be friends though

oh we can totally be friends. unless you're a dick.

and, surprisingly, you raise some good points. not many though, so don't slather yourself in peanut butter just yet.
so... in the moderately unlikely event that a woman puts a mans cock in her without his consent.... the charge is............................... (feel free to back this up with, like, a court case where it's actually happened)

it's not pretty equal rights. it just isn't. domestic violence? prevalent? i assume by domestic violence you mean maf? that's certainly what you imply.
in the last study (admittedly by mere police) i saw it was a 50/50 (male - female), physical, emotional, sexual, homicidal.. were they wrong?

Why doesn't it get prosecuted as much as you claim? well thats a number of things including the fact that the male may not want a prosecution in the first place or she used a weapon and as such a higher charge is laid.

you seem to think my claim is invalid... but then you go on to defend against it...that's all, like, defacto acceptance of my claim...

[Akzle]

My friend Axel did, we are bro's for life.

nice fuken apostrophe. sorry to say, only me an my homeboy quasi are bros for life.
you'll have to prove yourself., you need troll level 9000.

[jahrasti]

oh we can totally be friends. unless you're a dick.

and, surprisingly, you raise some good points. not many though, so don't slather yourself in peanut butter just yet.
so... in the moderately unlikely event that a woman puts a mans cock in her without his consent.... the charge is............................... (feel free to back this up with, like, a court case where it's actually happened)

it's not pretty equal rights. it just isn't. domestic violence? prevalent? i assume by domestic violence you mean maf? that's certainly what you imply.
in the last study (admittedly by mere police) i saw it was a 50/50 (male - female), physical, emotional, sexual, homicidal.. were they wrong?


you seem to think my claim is invalid... but then you go on to defend against it...that's all, like, defacto acceptance of my claim...

Na just proving that you only half correct, pretty much story of your life.

It's simple, Unlawful sexual connection. It would be in the case you state without consent of the male. There is case law but you can search for it yourself or get some dick head lawyer on here to do it for you.

Section 196 is not new and the whole domestic thing has been ongoing for years. Much like speeding and drink driving. Who knows in the future there could be a Female Assaults Male charge carrying two years.

Soooooo back onto topic and not NZ law.

[jahrasti]

nice fuken apostrophe. sorry to say, only me an my homeboy quasi are bros for life.
you'll have to prove yourself., you need troll level 9000.

We all know you are a fat middle aged white guy cruising sites pretending to be a blond 16 year old girl.

All the while typing with one hand as the other is gripping your "ahem" joystick.