i think you'll find i specifically mentioned "at caught" not "dealing with morons on the street"
just because it's legal, doesn't make it right. and just because cops do it, doesn't make it legal, and just because they say it or enforce it, also doesn't.
also governance and enforcement are two different words.
and what would happen would, i should hope, be the same as if i pissed on anyone else's shoes. a kick in the nuts or so.
Yeah, but it's only a couple of hate filled no life cunts Dave. Trotting out the same old boring stories time and again. i love the one where Axehole gives the cops the learn and they back off with their tails between their legs. Because in real life he is fucken intimidating let me tell ya!
Only a Rat can win a Rat Race!
See, I reckon that stammering away with excuses why you don't wish to defy the government is much that same as implicit acceptance of their right to govern.
Maybe one day you'll grow the balls to live up to your talk, but until then, thanks for your implicit approval of our system of governance![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
They voted for an erection and a change of stimulus.
With Key in a beehive. We are half way there.
He just has to stand really tall and hard, and everyone else runs around him as busy as they can. (that's all they voted for)
Then if we get really lucky - eventually he will explode all over the place. Coating the inside of the beehive with what I am told is "whale oil".
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
i'm not doing anything implicitly. you would have to define "our laws" - because i have a sneaky suspicion you really mean "crown legislation"
and i'm not pushing for anything. of your examples: i don't approve of speeding (NB, if your narrow mind can grasp it, speeding is separate from "exceeding the posted limit") and not a me-centric thing either.
smoking weed, absolutely, but i don't see how that is me-centric either
increased benefits? no, i want them reduced, massively. public servants should only derive as much benefit as they're able to contribute. both politicians and police should have their benefit/pay aligned to the national average wage, that might motivate the fuckers to actually make things better for everyone.
i assume, though, that you meant welfare, like, unemployment and having-ten-kids-cos-you're-black kind of "benefits", yes? them.... i'd raise them a bit but change how they're done.
i'd also ban woodstock and holiday 40s.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks