Cunt Key

**Skyryder** · 22nd September 2008, 20:23

Sorry about the thread name but I can think of no other word that 'so' describes this man.

John Key has got to be the ‘most’ hypocritical cunt in Parliment. He stands up in Parliament and pontificates on Clarke’s dishonesty in respect to the Owens/Peters loan and yet his lack of integrity is demonstrated by his purchase of 50,000 shares of Tranz Rail in Keys own name, and get this, while at the same time criticizing the Labour Government for wanting to buy back the Rail. Keys lame excuse on TV news that no one 'asked' and he lost money in no way excuses the fact that Keys purchase of the shares was too profit. Too profit while at the same time oppose Labour's buy back of the rail has got to be one of the most cynical and unethical actions I have ever witnessed in all my time of political activity. I’ve seen some shockers but this without exception beats all.

Skyryder.

**devnull** · 22nd September 2008, 20:27

So MP's shouldn't buy shares now?

Why no protesting about Chris Carter promoting a "gays only" scholarship programme in secondary schools? Gone are the days of earning scholarships with academic excellence I see...

And not so much as a murmer regarding Clark coming out and saying Winnie stays, regardless of whether he's found guilty or not...

Hmmm....

**Drum** · 22nd September 2008, 20:29

I don't see it as cynical or unethical.

He may not have believed it was a good idea politically, but also saw that he could make a profit out of it. That's the kind of savvy I want the leader of the country to have.

If he used his own name to buy the shares then how is it unethical? I'm sure he could've used a trust to hide his purchase if he wanted.

**awayatc** · 22nd September 2008, 20:29

With the amount of C*nts residing there, one could be excused thinking the beehive is a Bordello.....

However I rather have a c*nt in charge that tries to make profit,
then one that gives our money away in hand-out schemes.....

**maybe** · 22nd September 2008, 20:33

I was brought up if you have nothing nice to say say nothing at all

**pete376403** · 22nd September 2008, 20:33

She murmurred this "She did not believe there would be anything in the report that would justify Mr Peters being reinstated to his portfolios, Miss Clark said...

...This means it is likely Mr Peters will remain in political limbo until the election, though he will retain the benefits of office."

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4701503a6160.html

**Skyryder** · 22nd September 2008, 20:34

If you have any sort of ethics and integrity you do not profit from that which you oppose. Pretty simple realy. I think even a baboon could understand that.

Skyryder

**Bullitt** · 22nd September 2008, 20:34

I wasnt aware he held them as late as when he was making those comments. But irrespective of that how is it a bad thing? Its not like his comments would have made any difference and everyone buying and selling in that market was, or at least thought they were, fully informed, just ;ioke any other trade. Its not like he stole the money of beneficiaries to buy the shares.

Anyway what has this got to do with recent events at all other than Liarbore is doing particularly badly at the moment?

**Scouse** · 22nd September 2008, 20:35

Originally Posted by devnull

Why no protesting about Chris Carter promoting a "gays only" scholarship programme in secondary schools? Gone are the days of earning scholarships with academic excellence I see...

Wadday mean he's training them to become Proffesors of Proctology

**Drum** · 22nd September 2008, 20:39

I think I detect the mild, yet growing, panic of a punter who suspects they have backed the wrong pony!

**T.W.R** · 22nd September 2008, 20:41

What'd ya expect

he was an equities trader, one of the lowest forms of business. A successful business man as one person here said

profiteering of others misfortune for his own gain, a leopard never changes it's spots so once a leech always a leech.

**JimO** · 22nd September 2008, 20:42

key is a better man than helen

**Bullitt** · 22nd September 2008, 20:46

Originally Posted by Bullitt

I wasnt aware he held them as late as when he was making those comments. But irrespective of that how is it a bad thing? Its not like his comments would have made any difference and everyone buying and selling in that market was, or at least thought they were, fully informed, just ;ioke any other trade. Its not like he stole the money of beneficiaries to buy the shares.

Anyway what has this got to do with recent events at all other than Liarbore is doing particularly badly at the moment?

Ok I see Liarbore has raised this as a new issue. Completley coincidental it was on the same evening as the Priviledges Committee report which was so damning for Liarbore and Winston First...

Im still amazed Liarbore is getting more than about 5% of the vote. Guess theres always people that will vote for them because they and their family always have irrespective of what they're doing to the country.

**98tls** · 22nd September 2008, 20:46

Thieves,bludgers and a dictator..........sad but the fact that like sheep once again we will wear the ground bare in an effort to ensure they have a few chuckles for a bit.