Let's look at the stats for his Motogp seasons.
2006 - fifth
2007 - second on 242 points (1 ahead of Rossi, 125 behind Stoner). Didn't miss a race.
2008 - third. Even if he had won the single race missed he'd have still been third.
2009 - third. Didn't miss a race.
2010 - second on 245 points (12 ahead of Rossi, 138 behind Lozenge). Missed three races. Even if he'd won all them he'd have been second.
2011 - fourth
2012 - second on 332 points (78 ahead of Stoner, 18 behind Lozenge). Close, although Dani didn't miss a race - Stoner missed three due to ankle surgery.
2013 - third. Both him and Lozenge missed one race (Germany), where MM won. Arguably his closest chance. That said - if he'd not been injured, Lozenge still missed Germany, Pedro beat MM, AND MM finished third (who would finish second?) he'd have tied the championship on points. A lot of ifs.
2014 - fourth
Let's face it, the excuses don't really wash
'blame it on the bike' - OK, maybe if the bike is terrible, even the best rider won't win. But often the best rider is the one who can work with the bike, surpassing its 'disadvantages' and turning them into strengths. Often a 'bad bike' is just one that the rider hasn't figured out. Can one really argue that the Honda was bad enough from '06 to '14 that Dani couldn't make it work?
'injuries' - as shown above, several times he's been injured, he would have lost it even if he got to go straight to Go and collect $200 on those races. Injuries are part of the game and anyone in the game for as long as he has been will expect them. Plenty of other champs have dealt with injuries.
The overall theme seems to be that there was always someone else there who was able to work the magic and come up with the goods. And even if Dani had had the fortune to win one (or two) of the above championships he'd have won them by a slim margin, the kind that can be argued about all day. Not the crushing, 100+ margin victories that Stoner, Rossi, Lorenzo, have enjoyed.
Bookmarks