If you can't see the relationship between 1,2 and 3 then your beyond help.
Troops were sent overseas by politicians during the Bosnian war to protect civilians.
Some of those troops died thousands of others risked their lives trying to protect civilians.
The ones that died are also part of Remembrance Sunday. And are therefore completely relevant. Unless you think otherwise?
The Dutch didn't step in and try and prevent the fall of the city - not their problem I guess. As a result thousands of civilians died. Do you think that was the right decision?
Remembrance Sunday is not just about WW1/WW2.
Do you know anything about Hitlers plan for Germania?? Why do you think he was expanding into Poland?
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
"Lest We Forget" ...
For those that post on Kiwibiker please remember ... This is a New Zealand Web site.
In my early teens ... I attended an ANZAC day Dawn Parade that was also attended by protesters that claimed the day was celebrating the War Monger's that sent or went. Few attended any ANZAC parades that did not have friends/Family connections to those that went/died to/in those war zones.
Public opinion on ANZAC days ... has changed considerably since then. But WHY ... WHAT HAS CAUSED THIS CHANGE of OPINION ... ???
Most of those that went (THEN ... and in later years) did so simply ... out of ... and in the interest/intent of a great (Government paid) Overseas adventure.
Fact of reality ... ANYBODY entering an active service war zone may not come home alive. ALL those that DO go to such areas ... KNOW this.
Many signing the dotted line hope they'll never have to go. But .. Many hope they DO get the chance to go.
AND ... after years of training ... MANY (in uniform) want to put that training into practice.
And many (in uniform) do not.
The reasons ... "For Going" were THEIRS ... and ... THEY had THEIR reasons. Those reasons were NOT necessarily the official version. Strangely ... often for selfish reasons.
It was always a personal choice.
The results of their actions can not always be defined ... or understood. But the result for those that remain ... could be different now had they NOT gone.
Political decisions are usually made for the greater good of the Country .. and in/with support of/from her Allies/Friends.
Stand by your friends ... you need ALL the help you can get at times ... and you never know WHEN those times will be.
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
unfortunately, you know it intellectually but, when in your late teens, your gut still thinks you are bulletproof "It'll never happen to me" - I can remember feeling that way, it was a while ago (I wasn't always as cynical as I am now).
I liked the rest of your post but you and I will have to agree to disagree on this bit; there are many, many reasons for political decisions but, from observation (unless our leaders are truly stupid) the one you've suggested is a long way down the list.
...
...
Grass wedges its way between the closest blocks of marble and it brings them down. This power of feeble life which can creep in anywhere is greater than that of the mighty behind their cannons....... - Honore de Balzac
Political decisions are made to enhance the economic status of those who either have the ear of Government or bought the ear of the Government. The "Good of the Country" does not equate to a meaningfully employed and properous populace.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
That.
Or they've got the weird idea that in order to actually obtain discressionary income they first need an income, and the only place that comes from is the "productive sector", so it literally pays to not cripple the horse providing your apples before you bite the hand etc.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks