Bravo Ken.
Why not? Just do it.
& to be fair W-D, you have added comments of an off-technical subject type, yourself..
If we are to be frankly open & honest here, the somewhat hostile tone which originated from a certain contributor - can be clearly seen - in verbatim script.
For myself, I'd prefer to keep discussions on a reasoned, cooly technical basis.. rather than some over-personalised, prickly ego-thrashing..
Shall we now - put the posturing in the past, & resume a decent discourse?
I am up for it..
It's the link on the quote of the post you just answered, - moderator has deleted it, (no harm done I guess, just seems to be a general tightening up on the rules since the 'upheaval' started) - it does make your post seem a little irrelavent though!![]()
I asked that too, and the effective firing order is just that, two up, two down. Unlike a TZ750 which is 1/4 2/3 it is 1/3 and 2/4 pairing. BUT it is what it is, 180 degree.
Source: I think the photos earlier by Husa should be sufficient. Crank pins are arranged relative to the V angle, supporting this is also the period magazine references.
Thanks Husa for adding those ex post facto ( best if you note the addit/edit timing though) NSR 500 crankshaft pix on the previous page.
Frits has given his views on the potential benefits of 90`firing for 4cyl 2Ts, but I am sure we'd all value Wobbly's appraisal too..
You drive a Subaru - cage- to work? Tsk tsk..
Anyhow, if interested in engine firing orders, see here.. www.enginehistory.org/fo/FO.shtml
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Bookmarks