That Maico appears to be based on the 490 - which is of course a 2 stroke. A bit of smoke from a motocrosser isn't a problem...I'd be surprised if that layout ever approached the 490's HP figures - torque maybe, but no one I know has ever complained about a 490's lack of that....
Reminds me of this?
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1130803792
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
One thing (drawback?) about the single cylinder version is that there has to be a holding chamber with non return valves to store the first pulse.
If it were a twin cylinder, either a boxer twin or a 360 deg parallel twin (both having alternate firing cylinders of course) then no storage chamber with valves is required as there are effectively two under piston pulses combined making one supercharge (so to speak) which will go straight to the inlet valve on whichever cylinder is on the inlet stroke.
So a supercharge is produced on each stroke, feeding each cylinder on alternate strokes. - clear as mud?![]()
Strokers Galore!
As we know, the concept isn’t new, I think Husqvarna also did it ages ago. The difference here is that old mate routed the mixture thru the cam/valve gear to provide lubrication, whereas, I think, the others used the cam chain to carry the oil up to lubricate the top end, independent of the mixture.
What’s been achieved? Possibly a bit more power than the equivalent 4 stroke, but with the additional complexity of reed valves, an isolated crankcase, presumably a split crank with ball/roller bearings, external ducting & oil in/with the fuel.
I reckon the opposite is the way to go. Only if.
Here is a commercial example of the crankcase supercharging process.
http://www.shindaiwa-tools.co.uk/index.php?id=141
A lot of work to go to if it is only a 'marketing' advantage (though worse things have been done).
Cheers, Daryl
Daryl, Don't get the top post! - Is there something missing? or have I become completely befuddled?![]()
-
UPDATE : yes, definitely confused I think!- I actually do remember an Italian kart engine ( from memory, AMI or something like that)) which used that principle but don't think it could be switched to four stroke mode (guess half speed camshaft required for four stroke)
Most of the manufacturers have now got four stroke models, I have a 25cc Honda which doesn't use crankcase charging but in order to be able to use it in all positions it has a lube system where the oil is whipped up into a mist in a separate tank and is then circulated through the crankcase by the pumping action of the piston, up through the belt tunnel to the OHC setup, then back down into the tank again.
All very interesting, but I can't see that there is any benefit over a two stroke and it's more complicated - haven't seen much evidence of any of those little fourstrokes dominating the market either!
Strokers Galore!
Sadly Will, the thing operates on a 4 stroke cycle (and how dare you for ever buying one....), and they fundamentally don't have the short circuiting fuel scavenging losses of a 2 stroke. Over your Honda, they require no oil changes, hence disposal. In fact, that is one of the arguments for crank case scavenged 2 strokes, that the oil is disposed in the best possible way, combustion.
Still, some one had better get a move on to get the clean 2 stroke thing going before electricity takes over. It's all nice making more power and listening to the sexual arousal of a developed 2 stroke, working thru EngMod etc , knowing where the RAD is, and hours on the dyno, but if there is no place to run it, then it's all over.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks