Ultimate 911 POLL

[Woodman]

A lesson in physics, the weight of the falling top section of the tower is at 36% of it's mass.

https://youtu.be/DPwwcXF_V0c?t=41m20s

For those of us who can't be fucked sitting through 1hr 48 of boring shit delivered by a boring guy with a bad haircut to an audience also with bad haircuts, can you explain what this invited guest was going on about.

I wonder if they invited any one to balance the argument? I would guess no because it wouldn't fit their agenda, and they wouldn't listen anyway.

[Katman]

For those of us who can't be fucked sitting through 1hr 48 of boring shit delivered by a boring guy with a bad haircut to an audience also with bad haircuts, can you explain what this invited guest was going on about.

Don't worry, you probably wouldn't understand it anyway.

[Katman]

The push to get the 28 pages of the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry declassified continues to gain support.

http://28pages.org/2015/12/19/holida...-pages-on-911/

[TheDemonLord]

The push to get the 28 pages of the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry declassified continues to gain support.

http://28pages.org/2015/12/19/holida...-pages-on-911/

If they were so steadfast in their support - they would just release it themselves (like a proper whistleblower)

This is more about pandering to the American voter. Just like Mr Trump is doing.

[Katman]

If they were so steadfast in their support - they would just release it themselves (like a proper whistleblower)

Perhaps they'd like to keep their jobs at the same time.

[TheDemonLord]

Perhaps they'd like to keep their jobs at the same time.

Thank you for proving my entire point.

[Katman]

Thank you for proving my entire point.

You don't have a point.

[TheDemonLord]

You don't have a point.

I do, you just need to be able to understand it.

If you really want, I can spell it out to you - but I CBF.

[Katman]

I do, you just need to be able to understand it.

If you really want, I can spell it out to you - but I CBF.

If your point is that they should risk making themselves liable for a 10 year prison term by prematurely disclosing the classified information, then it's a pretty fucking stupid point.

But I suppose that should come as no surprise to anyone.

[bogan]

If your point is that they should risk making themselves liable for a 10 year prison term by prematurely disclosing the classified information, then it's a pretty fucking stupid point.

But I suppose that should come as no surprise to anyone.

I think the more relevant point is, that pointing the blame to a foreign country to help said terrorists is reliant on not just the basic physical possibility, but the near certain probability of events happening as per the nist report; completely devoid of your aforementioned pixie massless dust

But I guess it is a different day so it's no surprise your 'theory' has completely changed... And I know this has taken a while, but how are you going on fact checking that opinionated bloke's US household figures, you're not counting them individually are you? because I think you'll run out of fingers and toes a bit too quick

[Katman]

I think the more relevant point is, that pointing the blame to a foreign country to help said terrorists is reliant on not just the basic physical possibility, but the near certain probability of events happening as per the nist report; completely devoid of your aforementioned pixie massless dust

The possibility that the Saudi government was heavily involved in the planning and execution of 9/11 in no way absolves the US government of their part in it.

In fact it begs the question, if the US were aware of Saudi involvement in an attack on US soil right from day 1, why would they still consider Saudi Arabia as an ally?

[bogan]

The possibility that the Saudi government was heavily involved in the planning and execution of 9/11 in no way absolves the US government of their part in it.

In fact it begs the question, if the US were aware of Saudi involvement in an attack on US soil right from day 1, why would they still consider Saudi Arabia as an ally?

And yet, all that is baseless conjecture. Of course you're probably about to counter that if the docs show that to be true it wouldn't be baseless, which will be just hilarious...

[Katman]

And yet, all that is baseless conjecture. Of course you're probably about to counter that if the docs show that to be true it wouldn't be baseless, which will be just hilarious...

Well there's been plenty of 'clues' dropped by those who have read the 28 pages.

To call it baseless conjecture is clutching at straws somewhat.

[bogan]

Well there's been plenty of 'clues' dropped by those who have read the 28 pages.

To call it baseless conjecture is clutching at straws somewhat.

Of course they are dropping 'clues' it's how they stay in the media and garner votes. Surely you've noticed all the clues are baseless, as is the conjecture, as is the theory.

[Katman]

Of course they are dropping 'clues' it's how they stay in the media and garner votes. Surely you've noticed all the clues are baseless, as is the conjecture, as is the theory.

There's that wilful ignorance again.