Ultimate 911 POLL

[yokel]

Nice find.

I'll be following the progress of that WTC7 project avidly.

Yes, at the risk of sounding like a biased cunt we pretty much know what the results are going to be.
and it's not going to be office fires that's for sure.

No doubt the results will fall on deaf ears.

More on the project.

[Katman]

No doubt the results will fall on deaf ears.

I hope bogan and thedemonlard have the integrity to follow the progress of the project with an open mind.

Somehow I doubt it though.

[TheDemonLord]

I hope bogan and thedemonlard have the integrity to follow the progress of the project with an open mind.

Somehow I doubt it though.

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

[husaberg]

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

So that's the same Niels Harrit that claims he wants freedom to express his views in the media and then tries to sue a paper and loses when they express their own of his Crackpot theories.

[Voltaire]

Americans have moved on in the last ...whatever years.... Donald Trump is the future now....

[Katman]

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

Your predictability is exceeded only by your incredible stupidity.

Both videos made it abundantly clear that the project is headed by a Dr Hulsey of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself by arguing from a position of total ignorance?

[oldrider]

Americans have moved on in the last ...whatever years.... Donald Trump is the future now....

Donald Trump has well and truly sucked up and declared his allegiance and dedication to all things AIPAC and Israel first or he would have been toast by now!

Link: http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...g-jewish-ties/

Link: http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-ci...m-2517032.html

[yokel]

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

Discrediting the facts presented = strong argument

Discrediting the presenter of the facts = weak minded bitch of an argument.

Where are the "peer reviews" on the official conspiracy theories explanations on how build 7 and the towers collapsed?

So that's the same Niels Harrit that claims he wants freedom to express his views in the media and then tries to sue a paper and loses when they express their own of his Crackpot theories.

So when some news paper says a professor is a "Crackpot" it must be true? You are one dumb cunt.

Like I said you'll believe any nonsenses that backs up the OCT.

[husaberg]

Discrediting the facts presented = strong argument

Discrediting the presenter of the facts = weak minded bitch of an argument.

Where are the "peer reviews" on the official conspiracy theories explanations on how build 7 and the towers collapsed?



So when some news paper says a professor is a "Crackpot" it must be true? You are one dumb cunt.

Like I said you'll believe any nonsenses that backs up the OCT.

Lets see it was proven in Court that the media is allowed to call him a crackpot because he is one vs KB conspiracy idiots opinion (one that has been proven to be both dim witted and illogical).................

Are you unable to comprehend when a person falsely presents information as being peer reviewed he has no credibility at all in scientific circles.
So when this same person is then used to front a campaign his lack of credibility follows............
As much as Katman is trying to distance Niels Harrit from the campaign he is fronting it.

[yokel]

Lets see it was proven in Court that the media is allowed to call him a crackpot because he is one vs a well proven KB conspiracy idiots opinion .................

Lots of things are "proven" in Court, that does not mean it is true or right ya stupid fuck.

Like I said you'll believe any nonsenses that backs up the OCT.

[yokel]

This sums up the official fairy tail of 9/11.

Fuck the human race is bunch of stupid gullible idiots.

https://youtu.be/9mgMQBppiVk?t=4m29s

[Katman]

Lets see it was proven in Court that the media is allowed to call him a crackpot because he is one vs KB conspiracy idiots opinion (one that has been proven to be both dim witted and illogical).................

As much as Katman is trying to distance Niels Harrit from the campaign he is fronting it.

Fuck off shitforbrains, Niels Harrit is simply endorsing the project.

His libel case did nothing to discredit him as a scientist.

(Actually, has anyone got any information on the verdict to his High Court appeal? I don't seem to be able to find anything).

[husaberg]

Fuck off shitforbrains, Niels Harrit is simply endorsing the project.

His libel case did nothing to discredit him as a scientist.

(Actually, has anyone got any information on the verdict to his High Court appeal? I don't seem to be able to find anything).

He is fronting the campaign that is why he is on the front of the videos.(its his name being used to promote it)
Even you tacitly admit has no credibility that's why all of a sudden you are now trying to distance him from the campaign.

Your predictability is exceeded only by your incredible stupidity.

Both videos made it abundantly clear that the project is headed by a Dr Hulsey of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself by arguing from a position of total ignorance?

whose name is at the front of the video...............
The Crackpot professor made a fool of himself in court

Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf.
Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit:http://universitypost.dk/article/cou...pot-libel-case

His own words the court ruled it acceptable for reporters to call him a crackpot along with other religious and holocaust denying crackpots.

Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable!Niels Harrit https://www.facebook.com/Niels.Harri...53187683684154

[Katman]

Even you tacitly admit has no credibility that's why all of a sudden you are now trying to distance him from the campaign.

I have no reason whatsoever to question Niels Harrit's credibility as a scientist.

The fact that you're attempting to do so, in the total absence of evidence to that effect, demonstrates your desperation.

Now fuck off and choke on a turkey bone.

[husaberg]

I have no reason whatsoever to question Niels Harrit's credibility as a scientist.

The fact that you're attempting to do so, in the total absence of evidence to that effect, demonstrates your desperation.

Now fuck off and choke on a turkey bone.

Yet the very scientist Niels Harrit's called to testify for him at his libel case provided evidence and testimony that not only did not support him, it backfired and made him look stupid and ill prepared and a total idiot for calling him in the first place.
I provided the report of the case and I also provided what Niels Harrit's had said the verdict was and you try and say there is no evidence of the courts ruling.
You claimed you could find nothing on the ruling.

Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf. Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit:http://universitypost.dk/article/cou...pot-libel-case

His own words the court ruled it acceptable for reporters to call him a crackpot along with other religious and holocaust denying crackpots.

Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable!Niels Harrit https://www.facebook.com/Niels.Harri...53187683684154