Ultimate 911 POLL

[TheDemonLord]

I only like this thread for the cars. Not sure what I am more turned on by, the busty wench and the (?) Ferrari? or the Tom Selleck-alike perched on the Escort Mexico.

I did see a Mk 2 Escort rally special thing the other day which was really tidy.

Busty Wenches on the internet are a dime a Dozen.

Dude rocking the 70's mo, Flares and platforms like a Boss on an old Escort - that is a rare sight to behold

I have to say - I like this style of debate - make a point, Post a car picture - I shall contribute:

click here cause it won't let me imbed it

[yokel]

OK, engaging with conspiracy theorists is a hiding to nothing. They are not rational and no matter what the actual evidence is it won't matter because their position will not change. Same as arguing with any religion-blind person, or a Moon landing doubter, or a young-earth creationist (or fuckwit as the technical term is). Giggle, point and laugh and move on. Or post more cool car pics -with or without busy wenches or pointy sweater meats.

A final point, and why people like Dawkins dont get into debates with them: "Well, it would look good on your CV, but not mine."

the evidence for the official story is very weak and doesn't stand up to any kind of scrutiny, other wise there would be every little argument.

facts are facts, the official story only has evidence that is verified by themselves.

[Katman]

....and no matter what the actual evidence is it.....

There's more evidence that leads to questions than supports the official story.

The fact that the authorities are actively withholding 'evidence' leads to the biggest question of all.

What have they got to hide?

[bogan]

Excellent analysis, though I did have to do some chasing up for peer review on that content; however it was found that NIST did indeed make a clarification on that point, that "Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)" occured. So now this point about WT7 falling at freefall has been confirmed, but also put in context; that there was a small initial displacment before freefall occurred, and that the freefall only lasted around 2-2.5 s before the acceleration was slowed by the floors below.

Have you also some peer reviewed data/models/etc on possible reasons for this period of freefall?

That's gonna hurt when it lands. any video?

Looked pretty alright landing tbh.



Bit better than this guy anyway...

[Katman]

....however it was found that NIST did indeed make a clarification on that point, that "Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)" occured.

Their report was ammended after their 'mistake' was pointed out to them.

Do you think the people at NIST tasked with producing the initial report were incompetent or were they perhaps trying to be deliberately misleading?

Do you understand what has to occur within a building structure to achieve freefall?

[unstuck]

Wish they would have let me do that is this one. Fucking horrible trucks.

[R650R]

Well I see a few are feeling self conscious about their exuhuberent use of car photos and are trying to hide their homosexuality with truck photos now, cause everyone knows all truckers are straight....

Anyway if you were in New York you might have seen the five isrealis in one of these...

[bogan]

Their report was ammended after their 'mistake' was pointed out to them.

Do you think the people at NIST tasked with producing the initial report were incompetent or were they perhaps trying to be deliberately misleading?

Do you understand what has to occur within a building structure to achieve freefall?

Either way, it's all evidence of what happened; remember how this trumps any evidence of perceived motivations and the like.

I understand the basics, but I'm not a structural engineer so I'd prefer to see evidence both presented and interpreted by one. W which has also been peer reviewed by others in order to put into context what has to happen for this and to give an idea how likely this is. Emphasis is on the peer reviewed here, because there is no slam dunk of both sides agreeing on what happened.

[unstuck]

[R650R]

When you absolutely have to conceal evidence from a crime scene theres nothing like a mafia mob run trucking company and your buddy guiuliani to take care of it

[HenryDorsetCase]

When you absolutely have to conceal evidence from a crime scene theres nothing like a mafia mob run trucking company and your buddy guiuliani to take care of it

Ooooh oooh I know this one! THE SOPRANOS S3 E4 where Anthony has to go to the waste management company and pretend to work to take the heat off from the FBI?

To be honest I think we need to class this thread up a bit... Aston Martin AMV8 Vantage. Oooohhhh errrrr missus. Or as Sean Connery would say "Ashton Marrrrrrtin"

[R650R]

Aston Martin... yes prob the best way to blend in around New York while scouting locations for the Naudet brothers to film the first attack on the towers....

[Woodman]

There's more wild speculation that leads to questions than supports the official story.

The fact that the authorities are actively withholding 'evidence' leads to the biggest question of all.

What have they got to hide?

Blowers, I like blowers

[unstuck]

Ooooooo blowers

[R650R]

Blowers that reminds me for a couple of reasons, it was rumoured Atta and his co boxcutter wielders were getting around in something like this when the team and their CIA handlers were visiting all the Las Vegas strip clubs. Guess when your topping yourself for the promise of 71 virgins you need to see the merchandise on offer first....