I was wondering; does forum grammar, or lack thereof, affect the weight of the poster's opinion?
I was wondering; does forum grammar, or lack thereof, affect the weight of the poster's opinion?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
i dont care if the grammar is 100 percent correct or not.But if i have to read and re read a post and still not make sense of it,i move on
yes and no.![]()
For a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him.Keep an open mind, just dont let your brains fall out.
I wouldn't say I'm a grammar Nazi exactly, but correct grammar is still mportant to me. Having said that though, if someone explains their point of view well while getting a few commas and apostrophes wrong, it won't, de-value their point of view.
Grow older but never grow up
I admittedly have poor grammar it drives some others nuts for most people don't appreciate the way that I am able to make a sentence last longer than most people serve for killing people.
In my opinion Poor spelling is so much wosererer than poor grammar.![]()
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
My pet peeve is those that don't know the difference between your and you're![]()
Nah not really. That FuCkiN gNGsta forNICAtewiT wut wuuuuutTTT speak, or text speak, from a keyboard gets passed over pretty quick by me.
All good to poke a bit of fun but some of the cleverest people I know are dyslexic or struggle to string a sentence together with keyboards or keypads, KB community members excluded![]()
Yup, poor spelling certainly retards the poster in my eyes.
I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........
Your question should be:
Does grammar impact message communication?
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
English is based on simple rules and logic/deduction for the most part, so those who are either too lazy or too ignorant to get the basic right, are likely to have the same flaws in general. Which would make their reasoning skills less robust, thus devaluing their opinion.
Exactly, the ones that your not sure what there saying because of that shit are just to much.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
No, it shouldn't. As BMWST said above, of course messages may be too hard to read and get ignored, but I'm talking about the in betweens. We know grammar impacts message communication, does it impact the value of the message communicated as well is what I wanted to start a discussion about.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks