Your sovereign rights being flushed down the toilet by our politicians

**Brian d marge** · 26th February 2015, 18:08

oscars back

we have missed him

**yokel** · 26th February 2015, 19:59

Originally Posted by Oscar

The way the crap flows outta you, enema's are the least of your worries.

I think you need more enema's cause you're still full of shit.

youtube, it's my education.

**Brian d marge** · 26th February 2015, 22:53

you think thats bad
you should see what japan is planning

http://www.bloombergview.com/article...ward-autocracy

**Ocean1** · 27th February 2015, 18:55

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

well well
turns out . . .so far

if you google happiness of indigenous peoples

turns out that they are happy

yes the kids drop dead at 4 and 3/4 　and grandfather goes a tad stiff and starts smelling funky well before his time

but in the mean time life is good

what would be interesting would be the mortality rate and the happiness rate between western and indigenous people with the same access to health care

basically im guessing that its sucky to be poor in a society that promotes individulistic values

and community driven people still poor . .but much happier

How are you associating "individualistic" values with rich societies? The word you're desperately trying to avoid is "responsible' values. Y'know, where you contribute at least as much as you spend. And as far as I can see those that do not only form a healthy community but a pretty happy one. It's just the parasites that are unhappy, which is entirely appropriate.

But if you're happier seeing 3 out of four your kids die, living with permanent pain, lice and a more or less continuous hunger until you die of old age at 35 then by all means fuck off and live "off the grid". But I doubt you'll have much company to call "community".

Your choice. Just don't whine like a bitch at the rest of us for choosing otherwise.

**Brian d marge** · 27th February 2015, 19:19

Originally Posted by Ocean1

How are you associating "individualistic" values with rich societies? The word you're desperately trying to avoid is "responsible' values. Y'know, where you contribute at least as much as you spend. And as far as I can see those that do not only form a healthy community but a pretty happy one. It's just the parasites that are unhappy, which is entirely appropriate.

But if you're happier seeing 3 out of four your kids die, living with permanent pain, lice and a more or less continuous hunger until you die of old age at 35 then by all means fuck off and live "off the grid". But I doubt you'll have much company to call "community".

Your choice. Just don't whine like a bitch at the rest of us for choosing otherwise.

Might even contribute MORE than I spend ....how does that fit in with your Old world view .....
might even be a better place ....?

Your confusing Poverty and lack of health care access with * off the grid* again....and the community just seems to be gaining traction , just like Rome before its fall

The only whining you get from me , is to do with the garbage left by the never had it so goods, we will be clearing that mess up for generations

Hows ya house price ... doing well???

Stephen

**Ocean1** · 27th February 2015, 19:58

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

Your confusing Poverty and lack of health care access with * off the grid* again....

Nope. You can't separate the resources and skill required to provide a first world standard of living from the lifestyle that entails.

"Off the grid" is whining fuckwit for "without society and it's resources". Without which you get fuck all.

Welcome to the stone age, fuckwit.

**mashman** · 27th February 2015, 20:06

Originally Posted by Ocean1

Nope. You can't separate the resources and skill required to provide a first world standard of living from the lifestyle that entails.

"Off the grid" is whining fuckwit for "without society and it's resources". Without which you get fuck all.

Welcome to the stone age, fuckwit.

Well, as my vote is worth just as much as your vote, I say he can go off grid if he likes and still have access to the essential services that come with healthcare and education.

**Ocean1** · 27th February 2015, 20:37

Originally Posted by mashman

Well, as my vote is worth just as much as your vote, I say he can go off grid if he likes and still have access to the essential services that come with healthcare and education.

In which case you won't mind paying for them on his behalf.

Only, I'm all tapped out from having to pay for every other bastard loser on the dole...

**Katman** · 27th February 2015, 20:42

Originally Posted by Ocean1

Only, I'm all tapped out from having to pay for every other bastard loser on the dole...

You're an adorable benefactor.

**blue rider** · 27th February 2015, 20:59

letters to the editors

some people write them.

some are really good at it

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...bc1_story.html

Successive leaked texts show that the proposed intellectual property rules would have severe effects, including an extension of data exclusivity for biopharmaceuticals beyond the current five years. Adoption of the so-called transparency annex would also give the industry more influence over the process by which Pharmac makes its decisions and subject those decisions to costly and time-consuming reviews.

**Brian d marge** · 27th February 2015, 21:27

Originally Posted by Ocean1

Nope. You can't separate the resources and skill required to provide a first world standard of living from the lifestyle that entails.

"Off the grid" is whining fuckwit for "without society and it's resources". Without which you get fuck all.

Welcome to the stone age, fuckwit.

7000 year , under the stone age , earth and everyone basically ok

150 under the modern age and I cant swim in many rivers I cant drink the water , I cant eat the food without getting sick

America has/had for at least 5000 years some very intelligent people , they did not piss and crap in their own back garden , now we have Garbage living there

Now who is the fuckwit

Scared white van man

Stephen