Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 115

Thread: MNZ proposed rule changes

  1. #31
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by rustys View Post
    So by that it means no one will be doing sweet F#%K all,
    We are sad to announce the death of the five minute job, now requires a Permit to Work, Work Method Statement, Safe Work Method Statement and a Works Order Number.....etc

    Just means all works take longer cost more and end user pays.

    Maybe I could just get all the contractors to " sign a waiver" .......
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    23rd February 2010 - 18:49
    Bike
    As many as I can get away with
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    776
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    Wasn't it Port Hills in Christchurch, or Akaroa, and it was Her.
    Correct...Well done that man. I did hesitate when I wrote "him"
    We have to go through so much BS at work these days in the name of H & S, it's a wonder anything gets done at all

  3. #33
    Join Date
    21st October 2005 - 20:58
    Bike
    2014 Honda NC750X
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    3,478
    Quote Originally Posted by swarfie View Post
    Correct...Well done that man. I did hesitate when I wrote "him"
    We have to go through so much BS at work these days in the name of H & S, it's a wonder anything gets done at all
    Yeah, was the cyclists fault as they were treating the event like a closed road, which it clearly wasn't...

    I know the feeling regarding H & S, but to be fair we deal with some very nasty stuff that you only realise 30 years later and then it is too late...

    Some of it seems OTT BS though... But it does protect some people from themselves.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,843
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    Wasn't it Port Hills in Christchurch, or Akaroa, and it was Her.
    Le Race, Christchurch to Akaroa cycle race
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

  5. #35
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,843
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    Yeah, was the cyclists fault as they were treating the event like a closed road, which it clearly wasn't....
    Not quite, the cyclist believed it was a closed road event and it wasn't
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

  6. #36
    Join Date
    4th January 2009 - 21:08
    Bike
    YLR150RR and a RD350LC
    Location
    Not far from Ruapuna
    Posts
    2,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumph View Post
    Don't know or care about the register's interpretations but Schafleitener (spelling?) marketed a 6 speed conversion in AMC/Manx shell pre 63. It's never been illegal to use OLDER components....or replicas thereof. I do note however that the no more than 5 years younger rule is only for the PC's, not pre 63....That deserves a serious belly laugh. If someone starts making replica GSX1100 motors, I suppose we could always appeal the rule.

    edit On thinking about it as it relates to pre 82, I'm going to have to study how it relates to Guzzi and BMW motors - and learn the differences in years...
    Suzuki make replica GSX1100 motors, nobody else has to
    My neighbours diary says I have boundary issues

  7. #37
    Join Date
    15th May 2008 - 19:13
    Bike
    Enough that the car lives outside now.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,043

    Pre 89 Fuel correction

    I stand suitably corrected and humbled. Just had an interesting phone call, and I like many other people it would seen have incorrectly interpreted the pre 89 fuel rule submission.

    The phone was from a man far smarter than me, and who initiated the submission. It was he who identified that there are in fact NO rules covering Pre 89 fuel.

    If you track through the rules from the pre 89 rules in Chapter 25, to chapter 10, chapter 10 does not have any rules cover fuel for pre 89.....the rule submission is proposed to CREATE a set of pre 89 fuel rules. As the rule 10-17-3 ONLY covers up to pre 82...

    So, my apologies to all concerned, especially the initiator - a complete screw up on my part bagging it as a change , when in fact they were fixing a gap in the rules. Secondly, it would appear that meth and any other fuel could have been used until now. This at least limits it to more normal styles......next year would be good to close out the meth thing (most people don't want it I feel), but that's another story.

    Cheers

  8. #38
    Join Date
    13th June 2010 - 17:47
    Bike
    Exercycle
    Location
    Out in the cold
    Posts
    5,867
    Yet Billy told me on here some time back, that, specifcally, Meth was banned from pre 89....Was this one of those unwritten rules we're all supposed to know ?

    But if you read 10.17.1, pre 89 is not listed in 10.17.2 or 10.17.3 so is therefore currently restricted to "avgas or unleaded FIM"

    Disclaimer - my hard copy of MNZ regs is dated 2013 so there's a good possibilty that's been omitted from current regs....

  9. #39
    Join Date
    15th May 2008 - 19:13
    Bike
    Enough that the car lives outside now.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,043
    Grumph I beg to differ. 25.5.5 says 4 strokes open refer 10.17.3.

    Rule 10.17.3 says "the following classes...." and pre 89 is not mentioned at all. Therefore is a gap and 25.5.5 says "open" so that could mean anything unless specifically banned elsewhere in chapter 10 (like nitromethane). There is nothing in rule 10.17.3 saying pre 89 is restricted to FIM unload or avgas.

    I wish I knew about all these supposed unwritten rules people talk about! If it is not written down, it did not happen or can't be enforced. Looks like Billy was incorrect on meth being banned. It may be unclear until you really pick it apart, but I can't see anything there banning any fuel type in pre 89.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    9th October 2008 - 15:52
    Bike
    RSV4RR, M109R, ZX10R
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    6,165
    Blog Entries
    1
    Glad im out really. The 5 year rule has most bikes on illegal exhaust and carbs. Good luck finding 26 year old brake pads and discs. Some will need ride on cross ply tires. Where does one find a 30 year old kill switch for road racing or some old stock oil filters or steering dampers. No more xring chains or ally sprocket. I have a new 532 chain in the garage. For Sale-$400 or near offer.

    Good luck.
    I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    so what's going to happen at classic racing then....will it take several hours to check each bike for incorrect parts, or do they wait for the protests and then check them.
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    10th December 2009 - 22:42
    Bike
    less than I used to have
    Location
    Canterbury
    Posts
    3,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire View Post
    so what's going to happen at classic racing then....

    ...it will hang with the status quo ...I bet...

  13. #43
    Join Date
    28th April 2004 - 11:42
    Bike
    tedium
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    3,526
    Quote Originally Posted by mossy1200 View Post
    Glad im out really. The 5 year rule has most bikes on illegal exhaust and carbs. Good luck finding 26 year old brake pads and discs. Some will need ride on cross ply tires. Where does one find a 30 year old kill switch for road racing or some old stock oil filters or steering dampers. No more xring chains or ally sprocket. I have a new 532 chain in the garage. For Sale-$400 or near offer.

    Good luck.
    "Where a ‘major’ component is replaced, ie: Frame, Engine or Swinging Arm etc under the proviso of the generally accepted ‘silhouette’ rule, that component is to be no younger than five year than the component it replaces."

    How does this cover tyres, brake pads, oil filters, steering dampers, sprockets or kill switches?
    Quote Originally Posted by Kickha
    Fuck off, cheese has no place in pies
    Quote Originally Posted by Akzle
    i would could and can, put a fat fuck down with a bit of brass.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    "Where a ‘major’ component is replaced, ie: Frame, Engine or Swinging Arm etc under the proviso of the generally accepted ‘silhouette’ rule, that component is to be no younger than five year than the component it replaces."

    How does this cover tyres, brake pads, oil filters, steering dampers, sprockets or kill switches?
    What if it is a really big kill switch?

  15. #45
    Join Date
    15th May 2008 - 19:13
    Bike
    Enough that the car lives outside now.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    "Where a ‘major’ component is replaced, ie: Frame, Engine or Swinging Arm etc under the proviso of the generally accepted ‘silhouette’ rule, that component is to be no younger than five year than the component it replaces."

    How does this cover tyres, brake pads, oil filters, steering dampers, sprockets or kill switches?
    Given that none of those are stipulated as major components in chapter 25, I doubt it will be a problem. Not that I expect said change to be implemented.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •