Has anyone seen this?
http://xtrememusclecars.co/inventor-...ng-this-video/
Forum whore
Has anyone seen this?
http://xtrememusclecars.co/inventor-...ng-this-video/
Forum whore
Some further info.
http://www.geetfriends.net/
He sounds like the modern day Nikola Tesla.
Forum whore
There seems to be an unlimited supply of stupid people to keep these idiotic conspiracy theories going.
111000101000100010011110
He sounds like a scam artist.
Then again, you work with a few spanners right? Just build one and show us all!
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
It always amazes me how quickly some people form a conclusion before they've even investigated an idea.Originally Posted by bogan
111000101000100010011110
It always amazes me how some people assume the thing they find online has not been found (and investigated) many times before.
He's a known scammer preying on society's weak minded, good fucking job he is going to the slammer/nuthouse.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
Let me guess.....you've seen something on Mythbusters or you've read something on Snopes.
111000101000100010011110
No, I've looked at the 'theory' and come to the conclusion that it is just an engine running on dino juice, with the water being filtered off and used to cool/purify the exhaust.
Have you got to the working theory part yet? I'd be happy to discuss this with you.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Ta
Tesla was fucken crazy, intent on unknowingly releasing huge radiation into the atmosphere via microwaves, and dead fucken wrong in his belief that AC power is superior to DC.
Forum whore
http://www.rexresearch.com/pantone/pantone.htm
Forum whore
Well you know what they say Drew.....
There's a fine line between genius and insanity.
Ta
No doubt he was brilliant, just nuttier than squirrel shit.
He could have been a much larger part of the worlds history I think, if he had taken on board what others were doing and worked in a similar direction.
A terrible shame really, I think electronics could be even further advanced than they are if he'd been on board with the programs other people were working.
Anyway, back to the topic.
Dunno about the science of it, but lots of people have done something similar and posted similar results. But no one seems to do it with more complex motors.
Possibly because when ya start restricting exhaust flow on a motor in any decent state of tune, you quickly undo any gains achieved by the cleaner/more complete burn.
111000101000100010011110
See how there is always conventional fuel in the system? And see how that is filtered through the water?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
Fair point.
It would probably only be of any real use in an aplication where performance wasn't required but where continuous, cheap running was the number one priority.
Forum whore
Once the 100% conventional fuel scource used for starting the process is turned off though the engine then seems to run on a fuel/water mix.
It then would come down to measuring the length of time the engine runs for on the fuel/water mix compared to the same amount of 100% fuel.
If it ran for a significantly longer time than the percentage of fuel in the fuel/water mix would ordinarily suggest then surely the water is acting as some form of power scource.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks