Clark, Goff, Shearer, Cunliffe...

[mada]

let's balance this out - by having as right-wing tirade ... complete with chorus of yes-men


Adolf Hitler

Angry tirades are NOT the exclusive field of the left ..

If the choice was between Adolf Hitler and Labour - Hitler would actually get voted into NZ.

Regardless of the policies, he has the charisma, would say what others want to hear, a ferocious attack dog nature, and built a cult of personality. NZ voting public would lap it up, especially speeches blaming all our problems on beneficiaries.

[Banditbandit]

If the choice was between Adolf Hitler and Labour - Hitler would actually get voted into NZ.

Regardless of the policies, he has the charisma, would say what others want to hear, a ferocious attack dog nature, and built a cult of personality. NZ voting public would lap it up, especially speeches blaming all our problems on beneficiaries.

I'm terribly afraid you are correct.

[carbonhed]

I'm terribly afraid you are correct.

Of course people who disagree with you are closet fascists... bound to be.

I think one of the absolute wonders of modern social media has been to to display the political left at play for all to see... and they're fucking repulsive.

[mada]

Of course people who disagree with you are closet fascists... bound to be.

I think one of the absolute wonders of modern social media has been to to display the political left at play for all to see... and they're fucking repulsive.

Actually you're more likely to see the pot-heads and conspiracy believers of both sides: because the majority of lefties and righties are too busy working and probably looking after the kids to spend hours upon hours bitching on the net and social media!

Social media has been great for propaganda though. Goebells would have loved the shit and ways to manipulate and stir up the masses that we have nowadays.

[Oakie]

If the choice was between Adolf Hitler and Labour - Hitler would actually get voted into NZ.

Regardless of the policies, he has the charisma, would say what others want to hear, a ferocious attack dog nature, and built a cult of personality. NZ voting public would lap it up, especially speeches blaming all our problems on beneficiaries.

I've often thought that when he was in full flight Winston Peters was as powerful an orator as Hitler.

[mada]

I've often thought that when he was in full flight Winston Peters was as powerful an orator as Hitler.

Just watch and wait for next election. If Immigration isn't toned done, he will be blaming everything on Chinese and Asian immigrants - and will probably get a lot of votes for it.

Meanwhile Key will blame everything on beneficiaries and Labour. And strike the fear into the hearts that a Labour government would be communist and destroy NZ (remember how fucked up and third world NZ was from 1999 to 2008).

Why produce any long term policies when you can simply rally the masses by focusing negative attention on others.

[admenk]

Left, right............not really much difference

[carbonhed]

Actually you're more likely to see the pot-heads and conspiracy believers of both sides: because the majority of lefties and righties are too busy working and probably looking after the kids to spend hours upon hours bitching on the net and social media!

Social media has been great for propaganda though. Goebells would have loved the shit and ways to manipulate and stir up the masses that we have nowadays.

You and bandit bandit are sitting there stroking each others cocks bitching about how awful other New Zealanders are for not voting your way. It's disgusting.. but stay in the bubble and keep losing.

[gjm]

On one side you have Shortland Street.
On the other you have an evasive individual shouting "Show me the money!"

And NZ are currently supporting option 2, not understanding the narrow focus the money showing will take.

[puddytat]

Why produce any long term policies when you can simply rally the masses by focusing negative attention on others.

Modern politics in a nutshell.

[98tls]

Define beneficiary? we live in a country that sees it fit to hand out cash to those that have a child:wacko...monkey see monkey do.

[mada]

You and bandit bandit are sitting there stroking each others cocks bitching about how awful other New Zealanders are for not voting your way. It's disgusting.. but stay in the bubble and keep losing.

If you say so. Can you show where I have said Labour don't do the same?

[mada]

Define beneficiary? we live in a country that sees it fit to hand out cash to those that have a child:wacko...monkey see monkey do.

Lol. And when did we start doing that? You think it's something new? The payments for solo parents are pretty big incentive aren't they... a 65 year old single male gets more than a solo parent looking after a kid.

The ironic thing is when people complain about subsidising others to have kids, want their 20 years on the pension and low paid worker to change their diapers, and believe it can be sustained with a low fertility rate.

NZ full of people who think about the future and further generations.

[mada]

On one side you have Shortland Street.
On the other you have an evasive individual shouting "Show me the money!"

And NZ are currently supporting option 2, not understanding the narrow focus the money showing will take.

Don't worry we can expect some long term planning when China take over the place. They wont even need to send their military, as they'll be able to buy most of the place.

[oldrider]

Don't worry we can expect some long term planning when China take over the place. They wont even need to send their military, as they'll be able to buy most of the place.

The place has already been taken over and China is the least of our worries - the federal reserve system has the world by the balls!

Government toadies may come and go it's - who pays the piper calls the tune - the rabble doesn't get a say in who controls the money!