Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Sidecar Rules?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607

    Sidecar Rules?

    Look I don't want to be that guy, and it seems that even mentioning the rules around here opens up a can of worms but based on rule 24.2.3.3 below I would say that every sidecar running kart equipment would be non complying due to the brake discs being to close to the ground?

    24.2.3.3 Basic Dimensions:
    No part of the construction shall protrude more than 100mm outward from the outside face of the sidecar tyre. No part of the construction shall protrude more than 550mm outward from the centre of the rear tyre. Only streamlining and its support brackets shall protrude in front of the front tyre. There must be a minimum of 75mm ground clearance when the sidecar is loaded with driver and passenger in normal racing positions and all sumps and petrol, oil and water tanks, radiators and associated piping must be adequately protected underneath by at least 14g steel or 10g aluminium guards if they come within 90mm of the ground.
    I have been trying to get my head round a few things and have just come to this realisation. Given that I think we are all pretty comfortable with the current building format we may need to look at rewriting this rule for next years rule book submissions.

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Pumba View Post
    Look I don't want to be that guy, and it seems that even mentioning the rules around here opens up a can of worms but based on rule 24.2.3.3 below I would say that every sidecar running kart equipment would be non complying due to the brake discs being to close to the ground?



    I have been trying to get my head round a few things and have just come to this realisation. Given that I think we are all pretty comfortable with the current building format we may need to look at rewriting this rule for next years rule book submissions.
    Spot on. In fact how about rims and sprockets? Are they so different from discs? Unlikely that anyone would ever kick up a fuss but better to have a rule set that actually works than say 'she'll be right'.

    Maybe just amend it to state something like:

    Parts related to the driving, braking or direct constraining of wheels and axles are only required to exhibit 15mm of ground clearance when fully laden (This does not include engines).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,841
    The rules need to differentiate between buckets and full size F2/F1
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Kickaha View Post
    The rules need to differentiate between buckets and full size F2/F1
    These are within the Miniature Road Racing rules so no need to worry there.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    that's hilarious, more ground clearance than an adult sized chair.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607
    Quote Originally Posted by Moooools View Post
    In fact how about rims and sprockets? Are they so different from discs?
    Sprockets are in the same camp. Rims I see as different, but I guess at a stretch I could see where you are coming from.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kickaha View Post
    The rules need to differentiate between buckets and full size F2/F1
    As Moooooooooools said, this is all contained with in chapter 24 of the rules so effects nothing outside of that section.

    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    that's hilarious, more ground clearance than an adult sized chair.
    Seriously

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    13th June 2010 - 17:47
    Bike
    Exercycle
    Location
    Out in the cold
    Posts
    5,867
    Quote Originally Posted by Moooools View Post
    Spot on. In fact how about rims and sprockets? Are they so different from discs? Unlikely that anyone would ever kick up a fuss but better to have a rule set that actually works than say 'she'll be right'.

    Maybe just amend it to state something like:

    Parts related to the driving, braking or direct constraining of wheels and axles are only required to exhibit 15mm of ground clearance when fully laden (This does not include engines).
    Discs and sprockets are usually considered part of the road wheels. Ground clearance rules refer to chassis parts.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumph View Post
    Discs and sprockets are usually considered part of the road wheels. Ground clearance rules refer to chassis parts.
    Good enough for me. We can close the thread now.

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by Pumba View Post

    Seriously
    yep, 65mm is the ground clearance for normal chairs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pumba View Post
    Good enough for me. We can close the thread now.
    I think those go kart chairs still wont comply, aren't they like 20mm off the ground? 75mm would be well past the axle centre on those little wheels I would have thought.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607
    Front tires on the 5 inch kart rims are meant to be 10 inch diameter (of course dependant on inflation). Means axle centre should be around the 125mm mark.

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    5th January 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    motocompo
    Location
    Buttfuck nowhere
    Posts
    5,156
    Using the rules, all LCR world champ (proper ones, not kiddie size) are illegal because the lower suspension arm is too close to the ground.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    13th June 2010 - 17:47
    Bike
    Exercycle
    Location
    Out in the cold
    Posts
    5,867
    Quote Originally Posted by sidecar bob View Post
    Using the rules, all LCR world champ (proper ones, not kiddie size) are illegal because the lower suspension arm is too close to the ground.
    yeah, the car world went there in the 1960's when the Lotus 18 appeared with the bottom suspension links at around rim height. lot of angst about that but when the first one lost a wheel and didn't roll but instead came to a safe halt on the suspension everyone heaved a sigh of releif and ignored the naysayers...
    It's not a safety issue, in fact it's probably pro safety so it's ignored.
    Nowadays IMO, the ride height regs are mainly to stop any ground effect ideas.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumph View Post
    yeah, the car world went there in the 1960's when the Lotus 18 appeared with the bottom suspension links at around rim height. lot of angst about that but when the first one lost a wheel and didn't roll but instead came to a safe halt on the suspension everyone heaved a sigh of releif and ignored the naysayers...
    It's not a safety issue, in fact it's probably pro safety so it's ignored.
    Nowadays IMO, the ride height regs are mainly to stop any ground effect ideas.
    They used to use a couple of wooden blocked attached under the chassis if the race ended and they wooden blocks were worn to any certain extent they car was illegally low.
    That way no one could fudge the suspension ride heights on the fly.



    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  14. #14
    Join Date
    2nd July 2013 - 11:52
    Bike
    GPR150
    Location
    palmertson north
    Posts
    2,389
    oh well , time to scrap the sidecar, kart tires only 60mm before hitting rim , at least i have a spear motor

  15. #15
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607
    Quote Originally Posted by mr bucketracer View Post
    oh well , time to scrap the sidecar, kart tires only 60mm before hitting rim , at least i have a spear motor
    Pffft, stop being a sad prick. I wasn't attacking anyone just seeing if I was looking at it the same as the general masses.

    You have been talking about scraping that thing since it turned turtle on you anyway.

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •