Did wonder what Gary Larson's mad scientists would make of this? Found this and thought it summed it up nicely...
Did wonder what Gary Larson's mad scientists would make of this? Found this and thought it summed it up nicely...
I wondered why a couple of Ducatis I have bought over the years were so high geared, was told it was to pass noise emissions, who knows.
Funny America being the second largest user of coal power making a big deal about it...
Usual supporting link
http://www.worldmapper.org/posters/w...ap113_ver5.pdf
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Mrs B has a late model VW Golf GT (petrol) bloody great car. I'd buy another in a heartbeat. Emission shit be dammed.
Moe: Well, I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt. That stuffs loaded with nutrients. I...I can't compete with that stuff.- The Simpsons
VW TDi does that periodically too, apparently to help stop the cat from coking up. It's not a test feature, but based on feedback from the sensor in the cat. Reeeoww!
As for this scandal, as a Passat TDi owner, I'm not too concerned about it. The car is pretty economical (about the same as my VFR), has loads of torque (350 mutant-eaters from 1500 rpm to 4000, IIRC), and is lovely to drive. Yeah, the R36 might have been better, but I couldn't find a low-mileage clean one when I was looking around. The one thing that does REALLY piss me off is the ever-increasing RUCs; it makes no sense lumping it in with 3.5 tonne trucks, and so (apart from the torque for towing etc) I might as well have bought a petroleum powered PissRat. The overall running cost is similar, but the exceptional economy is negated by the tax, instead of being a bonus.
As for Seat, Audi, Skoda - yes, they use the same donks, but as a premium product, Audi have some that aren't used by the others, to retain some exclusivity.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
its turning into KrautgateBMW said it did not manipulate or rig any emissions tests. “There is no function to recognise emissions testing cycles at BMW. All emissions systems remain active outside the testing cycles,” a statement said.
11 times
- the amount by which BMW's X3 model exceeded EU emissions limits
Juergen Pieper, a Frankfurt-based motor industry analyst, said: “There is no suggestion BMW has done anything illegal. There are concerns for the long-term damage for every manufacturer that builds cars with these engines.”
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Nope. Just didn't have much to say about it that hasn't already been said on the webs or here. I did think VW NZ's response was a bit muted, but then I guess they're waiting for head office to tell them what the official line is.
Now that I've had some time to digest what's alleged(?) to have happened, I'm a bit disappointed. Yes, the supposedly clean-running of the TDi engine did have some influence on my buying decision. But.... on the other hand, if a compliant version of the engine maps was rolled out to NZ (assuming NZ models are affected), I'd be reluctant to accept it if it resulted in a significant performance hit. Selfish? Yup, I guess so. But it would be a case of the car I bought not being quite what I thought it was. So... I can see how Mrkns might be feeling and reacting.
VW America has always been a bit different to the rest of the world. Their cars are made in America, and not always up to the Euro standards and features, which causes them to get a bit pissy, when they miss out on new releases such as the Golf R Variant (wagon), because it's deemed to be a model that wouldn't sell in Mrka. I'm not sure either that (outside of Californicatia) they really give a rat's about emissions, and if they do, it's less important than HP or cupholders.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
And here I was hoping that the price of a new VW would drop to affordable levels.
Some top people have already resigned, no doubt more to follow. Some have been really bright and very clever people.
Neil
Well, The Shareholder want profits, the upper levels of the Corporation set the targets and the middle managers put the pressure on and the minions do what is required to meet the
requirements.
Unlikely they will find a document from a designer stating they found a way thru software to sense the vehicle was being tested and run leaner ( or whatever diesels do).
Probably say, software that reduces emmissions under certain conditions where said emissions may be detrimental.
That would be an easier box to tick off.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Theres a chicken and egg issue in all this.
IF VW hadn't cheated the tests would they have sold so many cars?
So then would they be as profitable?
Therefore would they have the money to invest in new technology?
They got where they are with the features they have because of profitability partially funded by the US market share.
What will be interesting to see is how they recover now they have to play on a relatively level playing field.
My prediction is the R ad D currently in the pipeline will continue but theres going to be a 5-10year slump in development similar to the slump after japan got hit by the last major tidal wave
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks