Review some of the critical history between Israel / Russia / USA. - Is or is not the common denominator always Israel? Many suggest we should think long and hard about that!
Apparently the Russian economy is in a very poor state says the Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...onomy-protests
Somehere else said their Army was ready to kick NATO's arse....
Herr HitlerYou only have to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crashing down.
That went well for Adolf.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
You get that when you sanction a country and it's people to death eh!?
"The past six years have been terrible for the Russian economy, which has stagnated as prices on the oil market fell. Russia took part in the monstrous conflict with Ukraine, prompting sanctions from the European Union. "
Odd how no country sanctions the US of A for illegally invading and bombing other countries! What's with that?
SYRIA - What is "Really?" Happening by who and why. - (Skip to 26.05 for current situation news.) The truth? - guess it's in there somewhere! .
Number one Igor Nikulin was the Source of all the information in the story you provided the link to
The story was written as if Igor was some kind of independent expert for the OPCW this is incorrect he was put forward to protect Russia's interests in the OPCW.
Igor is the Former Director of the Security Problems. His role was developing secrecy laws in Russia. What do you think that means?
The link is to the Russian news outlet Sputnik. This is owned and solely controlled by the Russian Government.
All the rest of the story is not sourced at all. Did you not find any of this odd?
Note the Lab mentioned denies all of what Igor Nikulin has stated about the results.
https://uawire.org/swiss-laboratory-...avrov-s-claims
In response to comments by the Foreign Minister of Russia,The laboratory in the town of Spiez, Switzerland that had contributed to the investigation on the notorious Skripal poisoning incident stated that the BZ toxin was not mentioned in its report.
“Only the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) can comment on this statement. But we can reiterate what we said 10 days ago. We have no doubt that Porton Down was right in identifying Novichok as the poisoning agent,” the Swiss lab posted on Twitter. Both the Spiez laboratory and the Porton Down laboratories are laboratories designated by OPCW.Not only that Russia its pretty clear Russia was trying to furthercreate a lie with the BZ claims.
"There was no other chemical that was identified by the labs. The precursor of BZ that is referred to in the public statements (by Mr Lavrov), commonly known as 3Q, was contained in the control sample prepared by the OPCW Lab in accordance with the existing quality control procedures.
OPCW Director General Ahmet Üzümcü
https://news.sky.com/story/uk-attack...ummit-11336845
Yet despite the latest admissions that the Russians where repeatedly denied Novichok exists.
Here a just a few of the changes to their story.
https://www.rferl.org/a/timeline-den.../29113561.html
So all of what you describe as being salient points evaporate into thin air.
Chrasher or Katman or Oldie and you could have found out all this quite easily, but as it suited what you thought had happened you never bothered.
The reason Katman and Chrasher cant answer questions is pretty simple, they don't know shit all and are not smart enough to look. either
Oh Robert Fisk
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/c...y-2331133.html
or this oneIn his Friday essay on 15 April 2011 (" The Arab Awakening - a long time coming") Robert Fisk quoted from an order said to have been issued by the Saudi Minister of the Interior, HRH Prince Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud on 11 March, in which he alleged that Prince Nayef ordered his security forces to show no mercy and to use live rounds on unarmed demonstrators.
Although the essay was published in good faith, we now accept that the "Order" in question is in fact a forgery, and that Prince Nayef did not issue any such order
http://s22592.pcdn.co/wp-content/upl...dent281006.jpg
or this oneUNEP has declared:“No depleted uranium shrapnel, or other radioactive residue was found. The analysis of all smear samples taken shows no depleted uranium, enriched uranium or higher than natural uranium content in the samples.”,
http://acikradyo.com.tr/arsiv-icerig...israel-inflict
So can you find any source for Robert Fisk other than the one doctor Dr Assim Rahaibani by his own admission never treated the people and was not even there.UNRWA set up teams to use the census lists to account for all the Palestinians (some 14,000) believed to be resident of the camp on April 3, 2002. Within five weeks all but one of the residents was accounted for."[81] A BBC report later noted, "Palestinian authorities made unsubstantiated claims of a wide-scale massacre
Are you aware that its practically guaranteed Assim Rahaibani works for the Syrian government or can you prove he is even a medical doctor or if that Fisk really even interviewed him at all.
Fisk in his article said he never interviewed any of the doctors who were on duty during the INCIDENT as
One might ask why he never went back the next day........ is it because he had his headline he wanted...............By bad luck, too, the doctors who were on duty that night on 7 April were all in Damascus giving evidence to a chemical weapons enquiry, which will be attempting to provide a definitive answer to that question in the coming weeks.
I also note that his publication is not a member thus is not actually regulated by the IPSO.
The IPSO was established following the windup of the Press Complaints Commission.
The independent actually ceased being a newspaper print publication in 2016
So why did the independent have to issue this retraction and an apology for this Robert Fisk article Stevo.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/c...y-2331133.html
Did you call that as well......
Or the massacre he reported that never happened where he claimed hundreds died.
Or the uranium bomb he claimed was used that had actually zero uranium
I will take that as you didn't think to actually look into the story or to Fisk.
But decided you just liked what he was saying. So it had to be true.
That's why it would not mater to you he reported a massacre where it turned out no one died.
Or a uranium bomb where there was no uranium.
Or an alleged death order from a Saudi prince that never existed.
You have done the same on numerous occasions previously David Ike, David Irving, Andrew Wakefield, Mark and David Geier, Paul Pantone etc etc
That's Okay Petes is all of a sudden Fisks greatest fanboi and I would wager a bet he had never even heard of him a week ago.
What is the bet that katmans dummyspitting abusive posts don't get deleted by bandit like he says he will do from now on?
I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks