Any cunt, that runs off and links as many quotes, some from pages, days, or even weeks back as that cunt, is fully on the spectrum.Originally Posted by Katman
Fully qualified Sifter.
Any cunt, that runs off and links as many quotes, some from pages, days, or even weeks back as that cunt, is fully on the spectrum.
Fully qualified Sifter.
Get a fucking grip. Like no American/British Minister hasn't?? You are seriously retarded.
Anorak
That is not really backed by reality. I have asked you the same question 4 times you have replied 3 times without any answer to what is pretty simple questionsUntil you can answer what is very simple questions any claims that who can objectively analyse any information presented before you is clearly in doubt.
Its pretty simple, answer the questions I asked or admit you don't actually look at anything you read with any sort of objectivity.
Here is the questions again.Its pretty clear you swallowed all the crap and are the RETARD.
Tell me pete did you read and understand the report?https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/...12-2018_e_.pdf
before you claimed it proved you right when it in fact showed you were wrong.
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...post1131094766
I sincerly doubt it? Are you man enough to admit you are totally wrong? I sincerly doubt that either hence you stupid quotes, So which is it? Not only wrong but also a total hypocrite?
Will you admit you are wrong now I sincerly doubt it. go on prove me wrong, by actually for once admitting you were clearly totally wrong or just confirm by not doing so, that you are a Katman level 5 hypocrite. Either way you are an epic dick.
Viking was man enough to admit he was wrong Katspam just slinked off as normal, what about you pete are you going to admit your wrong or just change the subject again......
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Just faidin away!
Only in America and some posters on KB -
Out of 26 Major Editorials on Trump’s Syria Strikes, Zero Opposed https://fair.org/home/out-of-20-majo...-zero-opposed/
A dose of reality:- http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49264.htm
is currently sulking in the Sin Bin
While the Skripal 'poisoning' and the 'alleged' Douma chemical attack certainly have the connection that they're both being used as a means to demonise Russia, you really do need to learn how to seperate them out for discussion purposes.
Otherwise you simply come across as being all over the place like a mad woman's shit.
Fully qualified Sifter.
I don't even read your shit, you stupid Cunt. And the only thing you've proved (once again), is that you're a stalker with a severe narcissistic personality disorder. Which is funny, as like the tin foil hat thing you like to accuse others of, you like to pull that one out of the bag too. But you're showing to be the absolute classic, of both. Stupid Cunt.
Anorak
Unfortunately for pete what we were discussing at that time was the Skripal poisoning that was clearly spelled out numerous times to him.
So go find another excuse.
Or just be like Pete and continue to try and pretend he wasn't proved to be both epically wrong and a total hypocrite.
You were wrong and you are too much of a complete loser to even admit it. You are everything you claim others to be and when your ego is wounded like it is now you attempt to throw the blame on those that have proven you wrong, seek some help or just piss off and sulk somewhere else. or do what an adult would do man up and admit you were wrong.
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Fully qualified Sifter.
What's that? Stalk young girls online?
Meantime...
Hardcore Biker
Post #460
Husaberg:
Not really no again I asked for the changes to the british story you suggested had occured, not many if any of that list actually fit that brief now do they
so maybe stick to the origional question. Using quotes of what the british officials have said that were later contricted by other british officials. Also add in the source of the information. Then we will have something sufficent.
================================================== ==================
Afternoon. I was tied up this morning (figuratively speaking), so your reply has had to wait.
Right-o !
Yes, my list of items did come from a variety of newspapers, and from some blog posts made by
various foreign commentators (on the basis of media articles they had read). And 'No', RFE/RL
wasn't among the sources used.
It took me long enough to search for and find many of the various articles again, so 'No', I'm not
going to repeat my search looking for and making individual attribution.
It's totally your choice whether you read what I posted, and whether you accept or reject the
points that were listed.
Because, Husaberg, at the end of the day:
1. You're not here to give me instruction, and I'm not here to please you (I'm sorry if you might
have assumed otherwise, based on your earlier post echoed above) ;
2. There will always be "multiple stories" to be told (not just one) ; and
3. We are all entitled to (and will make) our own opinion. And I'm quite sure that neither your
opinion (nor mine) will prove to be "definitive".
One might well argue that the majority of the related articles published via UK main newspapers
- and replicated across foreign news media - constitutes "communication" to the wider public.
Whether it be "official" or not.
People are not naive enough to expect UK authorities to have documented this whole saga via
"official" political statements (unless of course it reflected positively on them). The authorities
must always preserve some measure of official deniability.
And this whole saga does not come across as being one of British politics "finest hours". I really
cannot imagine Theresa May and Boris "fighting anyone on the beaches", let alone the Russians.
Just for my understanding, when Boris was interviewed and he "misled" us about the provenance
(still unproven) of the Novichuk used in the alleged Skripal poisoning , was that an "official" UK
communication ?
And when he was then caught out, did he ever issue any "official" retraction or clarification,
either within the UK Parliament or through the UK media ? I may well have missed that news.
But this whole Skripal saga is a little like "poorly prepared" herring. It is not very digestible,
and it can keep repeating on you.
Just like memories of Tony Blair and the headlong US and UK rush to war in Iraq 2003 (hand in
hand with their allies, of course). That was to do with "chemical weapons" as well, wasn't it ?
Did they ever find the alleged Iraqi CW stockpiles ? I may well have missed that news as well.
It's just as well that Theresa May and Boris Johnson are not using this Skripal poisoning as a
means of justifying attacking another Middle Eastern country (say, like Syria). Or for selling
of weapons to other Middle Eastern countries (say, like Saudi Arabia).
Fortunately al Assad has already been "offically" branded a "dictator". So now the US, UK and
French politicians can sleep soundly at night (after they have launched a few missiles or have
bombed some Syrian troops, er, ISIS terrorists).
Mind you, every cloud has a silver lining. The fortunate part about the whole Syrian affair is
that once Al Assad has repented (or been deposed), and the allies have forced the Russians
out (and the Iranians, we mustn't forget the Iranians), then the UK can start selling weapons
to Syria. It's a triple win.
Just have to keep that Macron from poking his nosey French nose into that space where it's
not wanted. Just because he's an "ally" doesn't make him a "friend". This politics business is just
so nuanced. No wonder I'd never make a politician (good or otherwise).
It's also very fortunate that MBS in Saudi is "an enlightened moderate leader" and not a "dictator".
That way, the UK can sell weapons to them with a clear conscience.
I'm sure all the nasty foreign press reports about the Saudi forces bombing Yemenis is just more
"fake news", because I never read about it in any of the "official" UK communications or blogs.
Even when there "may" be some UK forces present in Saudi, "assisting" the Saudi forces with their
"planning and organising". Judging by their success to date, the Saudis certainly do need the help.
Ah, it's a strange old world. So much different to when I was a young lad.
All we ever had back then to worry about was Vietnam, and look how well that turned out.
Cheers,
Viking
Anorak
Well viking i am not the one that suggested that the official British story provided by the british authorities had changed now was I. That was you.
So unless you are able to corroborate that with actual examples that are sourced and are not just based on your opinion.
The suggestion that now you should include journalists listing possible theorys as being part of the official british story is laughable. It also smacks of desperation on your part.
All i can say is what you said was your opinion that you are not able to corroborate at all. Actually all these statements above, including your reasoning for them are your opinion only.
When you are able to provide statements to back up your assertions then you might have something. until then you have nothing to back up what you said other than your notion that what you thought they might meant or said have happened.
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Hardcore Biker
Your opinion.
Anorak
But sadly thats the only opinion that could be reached from reading what you wrote as the second attempt at a question.
If you believe you are right show me where what you wrote is backed by statements made by the UK authorities.
Just for my understanding, when Boris was interviewed and he "misled" us about the provenance (still unproven) of the Novichuk used in the alleged Skripal poisoning , was that an "official" UK communication ?You said UK Authorites changed their stories so no you cant argue that point.One might well argue that the majority of the related articles published via UK main newspapers - and replicated across foreign news media - constitutes "communication" to the wider public. Whether it be "official" or not.
Here is your quote below.
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Hardcore Biker
But sadly thats the only opinion that could be reached from reading what you wrote as the second attempt at a question.
If you believe you are right show me where what you wrote is backed by statements made by the UK authorities.
You said UK Authorites changed their stories so no you cant argue that point.
Here is your quote below.
Is Boris (as the UK Foreign Minister) not a sufficient British authority in this respect ?
can I not at least rely on one of those bastions of the British press, the Guardian, for
reliable reporting ?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...n-russia-video
Or the German state owned newspaper, Deutsche Welle ?
http://www.dw.com/en/boris-johnson-a...iew/a-43251856
I'd post up a YouTube link as well, but it points to a Russia Today (RT) video clip.
Perhaps you could point me to the fountain of knowledge (on this saga) - to which I
should henceforth refer - so that I don't transgress in the future ?
Cheers,
Viking
Anorak
So show me where he changed his stance, the home secretary clarified what he had meant to say. this was made in a public statement a short ime after.
So now then show me how this accounts multiple changes of a story you accused the UK authorities of and for the multiple deniles from russia that Novichok didn't exist, No such name was ever used, then was actually destroyed, was never made in Russia, was never made in the USSR, couldn't have been used, wasn't used, the actual poison was BZ etc etc etc.
remember you said a ever changing story line provided by UK officials.....
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Hardcore Biker
Look, if we can't rely on the UK Guardian for honest reporting on the UK Foreign Minister,
it really is a sad state of affairs. I mean, the headline says it all.
Denial(s) ? I checked with my older son, and he assures me that there is only one Nile,
and that's in Egypt. Not in Russia. I've checked on the Atlas just to make sure.
Thank you for your kind invitation to discuss conspiracy stories about the Russians, but
I'm a little busy at the moment. Another time, maybe.
Cheers,
Viking
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks