Damn I love a set of blingy upside down forks on a retro rocket.
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/n...xton-revealed/
Damn I love a set of blingy upside down forks on a retro rocket.
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/n...xton-revealed/
fuck i hate iphone picography (i shant call it PHOTOgraphy)
narrow dof, shaded background softening filter with generic fade to black frame. EVERY TIME. Gay shit. Gay shit.
Sick fuken bike, but.
Fuck em. For way too many years I've told them I want pretty much that engine in a Bonnie. Tough Triumph - I purchased a Ducati and life is good.
The reviewer for Stuff seems to like its little brother the 900 (actually 865)
http://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/bike...century-triton
But I do note he points out the new Guzzi is 20kg lighter
=mjc=
.
I still think Triumph are rude words.
They have done well to hind the radiator.
I see the cat under the front of the engine? - note the wank about the headers directing pipes hidden etc etc is not new - this has been done before - yawn.
They do look spunky though - torque figure is high. HP - I predict 92 horses.
Without the cat, (aftermarket pipe), there will be a huge gap between the motor and the frame tubes
Why will they not come up with a hp figure?
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
I did like the Norton when it came out but at that price it was never going to be on my radar. I am struggling to justify over $20K on a bike and I am pretty sure the Thruxton R will be mid 20's. For a weekend sunny weather toy perhaps if I was loaded, for an everyday ride which will suffer through rain, ice and my general lack of care for mechanical objects it doesn't really stack up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks