Take the $100,000 Global Warming Believer Challenge!

[Voltaire]

" one in a hundred year events going to happen annually"

Why do they keep making this stuff up.......

" nothing to do with us says the 7 billion people interviewed"

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a6998516.html

[flyingcrocodile46]

Putting mans insignificant influence on climate change to bed.

Finally, the original scientists (panel of 10) who predicated the fraud about Co2 being the primary cause of climate change have fessed up that they fucked up. The same scientists who's original studies underwrote all the carbon data that the IPCC used in all their various members failed climate change models and successful carbon tax fraud schemes.


When you get to the bones of their heavily criticized poorly constructed original assumptions about the causes of climate change it is revealed that these "scientists" only attributed 0.1% effect to the sun??????. The same sun that basically is our climate change thingy, you know winter, spring, summer and autumn etc. One tenth of 1%. Seriously?


It turns out that the publication of hundreds of solar forcing studies by honest scientists (who the MSM consistently persecuted and ridiculed as climate change deniers) have forced the original "scientists" to concede how badly they underestimated the sun. Those same ten "scientists" have now released a new study confirming the true extent of the previously underestimated effects of the sun and the fact that they overestimated the Co2 factor by a factor of 50% or more.

More importantly, they over estimated the impact of man made C02 (which is only a small percentage of the overall Co2 emission problem) by a whopping factor of 200 to 300%.

Poof goes the Carbon tax justification.


Of note is the fact that every single one of the thousands of scientific gloom and doom models, studies, reports that purport to measure the impact of man made Co2 are 200 to 300% wrong and nothing more than "scientifically proven" quackery.


I wonder how long it will take for this climate change fraud to filter down through to us suckers who have resigned ourselves to pay our carbon sinner taxes. Will it even be disclosed? After all, this is the founding seed of the NWO tax base that we are talking about here. I bet the MSM and IPCC will carry on with their climate change lies all the same.

Now you know, will you just go along with it anyway?


The story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS0qLhqaZDM


Carbon Effect Paper: https://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v...

[SPman]

What a load of fucking shite!

[jonbuoy]

Renewables aren't the only answer, but household appliance and lighting power requirements are dropping. I've been thinking about adding a 12v DC system in the house powered by a solar cell and battery arrangement. I can't run a washing machine off it but I could easily run my router wifi ,domestic lighting, phone and iPad charger off it.

Renewables are being taken as a serious threat by oil gas and coal companies.

[flyingcrocodile46]

There is a Nugget of truth in that, I will concede, however Science isn't predicated on trust, it is predicated on Evidence - and one should be able to pick an experiment done by either the Corporate Scientist or the Government scientist and repeat the tests to verify the conclusions.

Although it may take some time, the bogus studies are eventually found to be just that, whilst the legitimate ones stand up to the rigorous scrutiny of Peer Review.

Exactly. But unfortunately peer reviews and reproduction of results occurs in less than 10% of published studies because no one pays to to do them. Even then, it is often too late to to reverse the long term brain damage and faulty programing that results from the sheeple's initial and shameful eagerness to consume trending (propagandised) lies that the msm and its owners present.

Case in point, the news release from the original panel of 10 scientists who told the world that man made Co2 is the primary cause of global warming (which had to be re badged as "cLiemate change"). The same scientists who's original studies underwrote all the carbon data that the IPCC used in all their failed climate change models and successfully underpinned the carbon tax fraud schemes. Nobody wants to believe it, because they are so thoroughly brainwashed they actually want it to be true, rather than admit that the titty that they enthusiastically sucked was actually (as some of us accurately surmised) a cock in disguise.

Admittedly the gods of GW have made it easy for the cock addicts to deny by using very vague statements (unlike myself), but the "supplementary documents" (their un-summarised actual report conclusions) are linked on the page for those who are able to understand them.

I'll be the first to admit to less than 10% comprehension of the specifics, but it is clear enough that they have made big adjustments to their initial assumptions around C02 and non C02 radiant forcing (upon which mans contribution to Co2 radiant forcing was based), and that those changes indicate an approx 1 deg change (yes less than 1 deg) from the original guess that they made. However, that is only my uneducated take from my own perusal.

The specifics of the study conclusion can only really be identified by climate scientists (Like Ben Davidson who presents the recently linked video). There is an equally obtuse follow up by "the scientists" on the Oxford website where they are trying to undo some of the ensuing damage that has resulted from some extreme and uneducated interpretations of their revised study conclusions. These guys are definitely not going to say 'straight out' that it has completely turned the man made GW senario on its head as they are far too invested to do so. But the lesser known scientists who put them under pressure to re-evaluate their conclusions (like Ben Davidson) will present the facts for those that have open minds.