
Originally Posted by
Akzle
we use this marvelous shit called reinforced concrete. Building cities on sand is fucking stupid, even jesus knew this.
And there are building methods that move with an eartquake and survive, rather than trying to brace against it (and failing).
Reinforced concrete is great - but it's only strong under compression - which is why it doesn't do too well in an Earthquake. Also interesting is that Basements aren't common in Japan aswell (probably one of the world leaders on Earthquake construction)

Originally Posted by
Akzle
Centralisation requires distribution. Every which way you paint it, distribution if far less efficient than locally sourced, used, recycled shit.
Not necessarily, sometimes the cost of distribution is massively offset by the gain in efficiency via economies of Scale - case in point is AC vs DC current and our current electrical grid.

Originally Posted by
Akzle
The line losses on electricty distribution are enough to power a city full of your mums dildos.
So no loss at all then, cause Dildos don't use any power - A Vibrator on the other hand...

Originally Posted by
Akzle
The reticulation network for water, sewerage etc... Inefficient, and large ongoing maintenance requirements.
Having one plant, servicing 100,000 homes (hypothetical) with 100 people looking after it - is that more or less effecient than having 100 plants servicing 1000 homes each, with each plant requiring 2 people to look after it.
Even more so when you consider would the 1000 homes generate enough input so that the 100 plants can operate at peak effeciency?
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Bookmarks