I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Going off the various claims he makes - I think suggesting he was someone with Delusional Disorder is more likely than just a garden variety liar....
As for the Evidence - from what I have seen (and Katman has posted up) it is laughable. Hell, I remember one bit of evidence (a supposed remote detonating unit) where even other conspiracy theorists were even pointing out that the unit they were promoting on the front page of their website couldn't do the things they claimed it could, and yet it is still there, pulling the wool over all the Conspiracy Sheeple's Eyes.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Ok, amateur diagnostician.. how'd you rate yourself on that liar-deluded scale?
You do realize that even the Roman engineer & concrete master responsible for the yet still standing in Rome,
magnificent Pantheon - would be proud of how massively concrete your thought processes are..
& yeah, how'd you go on that AQ test? Be honest now..
C'mon fella, too much THC gettin' to ya?
At least try..
Now if you actually meant to ask.. "How does your internet diagnosis affect my prognosis" -then that is quite different..
But, also irrelevant, since the AQ self-test is for your own elucidation..
& ours, if you're honest ( or not) - about the results you got..
What a load of shit.
That's just your own spin you're putting on it as an excuse for refusing to leave the flock.
And if you are talking preconceptions, automatically labelling anyone who questions an official story as a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist is just that - a preconception.
And furthermore, anyone who claims that the JFK assassination happened just like the official story tells us it did, has either done no research on the matter or is fucking brain dead.
Refresh my dead brain in a couple of lines what happened .
Did the Kennedy assassination make any difference ?
The biggest conspiracy is that there is a God, Billions buy into it, billions are made out of it, millions die because of it, yet there is no evidence.
I got of the church bandwagon nearly 40 years ago but don't feel the need to go on and on about it.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
No, I was actually being sarcastic - I've known for years that I've got various personality traits that could indicate a mild form of Aspergers/Autism, and guess what? I couldn't give two fucks. The point that you so brilliantly missed was that you are talking out of your arse and don't know shit.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
You can call it Spin - but I call it a pattern - of those that left a comment about why they chose to put their name forward, I saw the same sentiments time and time again - that they knew exactly what had happened as soon as they heard about it, as opposed to when they had had a chance to evaluate the evidence.
If you can't understand that this shows that a not insignificant number of people on those sites had preconceived beliefs, well - I believe the phrase that you are always ready to throw out is 'Cognitive Dissonance'
finally as for labelling anyone who questions the official story a Conspiracy Theorist - not at all. Questioning the official story is Skepticism - making up alternatives based on subjective, false or shaky evidence because it fits your warped preconceived world view - THAT is what makes me label you as a Conspiracy theorist (and a Nut Job for that matter)
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks