
Originally Posted by
Grumph
Exactly so. What MNZ and the original questioner have to realise is that what is in the rule book IS the rule. It can be varied (but the intent can't be changed) by meeting supp regs. Any clarification from MNZ is merely how someone at MNZ sees the rule - IT IS NOT A RULE.
The rule book as it stands is what we work to, not anonymous suggestions.
The only ways to define it absolutely are to either change it with a remit or protest someone and have it defined by the process of protest, appeal, judgement.
I see no reason to do either.
I would definitely agree with Grumph and Kel.
I'm assuming that MNZ rules operate in a similar fashion to laws. If so, then Westminster Law principles would apply (what all NZ law is based on). That is, unless it is expressly forbidden, it is allowed. In this case if you can show somehow that a carb meets the 24mm restriction through any interpretation of the rule (i.e. somewhere in the carb body measures no more than 24mm in this case) then it is legal. This would be especially easy if it is how one or more carb manufacturers determine the size of their carbs already, which would therefore constitute a standard convention within industry. i.e. you're following industry standard practice when measuring carb size, not making up your own. Bored out carbs with a venturi, might be on the fringes, but still they're not expressly forbidden, therefore they're legal, especially if they started out as a standard 24mm carb.
The only time this would change is by precedent, which would be when MNZ actually makes a formal ruling regarding a specific location that the measurement has to be taken from or how long the 24mm restriction within a carb needs to be. In the MNZ case this would probably take the form of a supplementary regulation regarding the 24mm carb restriction. In this case it seems like all that's been given is the opinion of an MNZ official, which I wouldn't think constitutes a ruling and hence wouldn't constitute a precedent/supplementary regulation on which to base future determinations of carb legality on.
Therefore, going forward I'd say nothing has changed. If it's not explicitly stated in the rules as being illegal, it's legal. And, the MNZ opinion on the 24mm carb restriction counts for almost nothing until it becomes a supplementary regulation.
Hilleye
If it doesn't bring a tear to your eye, add a little more fully synth 2T to the mix.
Bookmarks