big thumbs up for the cops

[spudchucka]

Well, in some areas he is . Overseas travel for instance, if he has to apply for a visa. And some jobs - like the police ?

Guess there can be an argument made that a veil should be drawn over past transgressions after the offender has PROVED he's turned over a new leaf. But that means going for a goodly number of years without reoffending, not immediately he's released on parole.

There's the clean slate bill in force now. If you have made a mistake in your past but not reoffended then your convictions are concealed. A minor assault or fighting charge probably wouldn't prevent you from being recruited into the police if you met all the other requirements. A serious assault charge would certainly prevent you from being recruited and rightly so in my opinion.

[Lou Girardin]

Uh - this wasn't just entry without a warrant was it - according to this thread - this was an entry without a warrant into a house of a repeat offender who was re-offending while on parole.... bit different

There was no re-offence. He moved into a new area. The Police Officer entered his house using the "ways and means" Act to take his photo. The paedophile is also retarded, he didn't know to refuse entry to the cop.
Once again, without defending these scum, they can no more resist their urges than anyone else can resist their sex drive. It's very powerful motivator. Look at Graeme Capill he's showing no remorse for the kids at all. He's complaining about his treatment in jail now and may be appealing his conviction. He still believes he was entitled to abuse those kids.
Even chemical castration can be nullified. Viagra is one way.
There is only one way to guarantee no re-offending.

[Lou Girardin]

THE COP IN THIS CASE WAS 100% SURE HE GOT THE RIGHT MAN , THE DUDE ADMITTED IN COURT IT WAS HIM

A mob in Manchester (I think) were sure they had the right person when they beat up a paediatrician.
Around the same time another innocent person was beaten to death, because it was thought he was a paedophile.

[Lou Girardin]

This is the first mention of the guy who's causing all the shit. The bloody lawyer who's advising him. The peadophile isn't bright enough to have figured this out for himself. He's being led by what appears to be an opportunist lawyer out to make a few grand with no thought for the moral issues. Maybe he should be taking some of the flack too

The first thing we do, kill all the lawyers.

Bling to the first correct attribution.

[spudchucka]

AGREE, BUT MY POINT IS THAT BONDAGE IS NOT NORMAL BEHAVIOUR YET A LOT OF JUDGES INDULGE , IM QUESTIONING THE JUDGES MORALS , THE SAME JUDGES THAT ARE LETTING THESE SICKOS OFF LIGHTLY

Care to offer any proof as to the judges indulgence.............. otherwise I'll assume you are just talking shit or making a huge generalisation.

[spudchucka]

I'm not anti Police, but I'd suggest the only time they get "reamed" is when the issue becomes public.

Wrong. Plenty of matters are dealt with in-house. An adverse report on your file can pretty much screw your career. There are lot of assumptions made about policing, assumptions made in more or less total ignorance of the facts.

I don't mean any dissrespect to you in saying that, its just my observation.

[spudchucka]

If you're not following the discussion, keep up or keep out.

Act your age dickhead!

[Deano]

Wrong.
I don't mean any dissrespect to you in saying that, its just my observation.

So it never happens ? I'd be very surprised. It's my observation that it does, but you could be right, I could be wrong.

I bet if I complained to a senior cop about the way I was once treated (being detained without arrest and poked in the face by a detective) it would have been swept under the carpet, unless maybe I had a video or tape recording and went public. Just my opinion.

Like I said, I'm not anti Police - but I wouldn't automatically assume they can all be trusted.

[scumdog]

So it never happens ? I'd be very surprised. It's my observation that it does, but you could be right, I could be wrong.

I bet if I complained to a senior cop about the way I was once treated (being detained without arrest and poked in the face by a detective) it would have been swept under the carpet, unless maybe I had a video or tape recording and went public. Just my opinion.

Like I said, I'm not anti Police - but I wouldn't automatically assume they can all be trusted.

It could be that YOU saw no action taken but even so that file would be resting pretty heavily on the relevant officers personal file.

No satisfaction to you but it's a 'blot' on the officer file.

[Lou Girardin]

A complaint about the driver of a Police car (possibly not a cop) to the Roadwatch website was dealt with 'in-house'.
In fact it was so deep in-house that they convieniently 'lost' the complaint.
You give them a chance to have a quiet word with the driver and instead they play games.
I guess the only way to deal with piss poor Police driving is go straight to the PCA.

[Patrick]

So it never happens ? I'd be very surprised. It's my observation that it does, but you could be right, I could be wrong.

I bet if I complained to a senior cop about the way I was once treated (being detained without arrest and poked in the face by a detective) it would have been swept under the carpet, unless maybe I had a video or tape recording and went public. Just my opinion.

Like I said, I'm not anti Police - but I wouldn't automatically assume they can all be trusted.

There are occasionally some out there that are dodgy but they get weeded out real quick.. might have been swept away a while ago but no this day and age, full enquiry, likely charges of assault, but, there is two sides to the story, isn't there?

[Patrick]

A complaint about the driver of a Police car (possibly not a cop) to the Roadwatch website was dealt with 'in-house'.
In fact it was so deep in-house that they convieniently 'lost' the complaint.
You give them a chance to have a quiet word with the driver and instead they play games.
I guess the only way to deal with piss poor Police driving is go straight to the PCA.

If it was lost, resubmit it...unless ya forgot what it was about in the first place? A "word" often works well, called discretion, which is used regulalry out there on the roads and streets of this Police state......did you want them hung, drawn and quartered? Probably find the driver got a ticket, just like any other member of the public would get one...but we digress... recidivist paedophiles is what this is about, not a minor traffic indiscretion. BIG difference. Kiddies screwed up for life, these "things" do their time and all is forgiven??? Does your cardigan zip up or button up???

Where is my Tui???? Yeah, right....

[Lou Girardin]

If it was lost, resubmit it...unless ya forgot what it was about in the first place? A "word" often works well, called discretion, which is used regulalry out there on the roads and streets of this Police state......did you want them hung, drawn and quartered? Probably find the driver got a ticket, just like any other member of the public would get one...but we digress... recidivist paedophiles is what this is about, not a minor traffic indiscretion. BIG difference. Kiddies screwed up for life, these "things" do their time and all is forgiven??? Does your cardigan zip up or button up???

Where is my Tui???? Yeah, right....

Read the post Patrick. They lost the complaint, can't find the details, vanished into the ether, dematerialised, beamed to some parallel universe.
Caught on yet?
And, trusting soul that I am, I assumed that an emailed complaint would be traceable.
BTW. An explanation and possible apology is all I sought from this driver.
There are other cops that need hanging, drawing and quartering.

[Deano]

but, there is two sides to the story, isn't there?

Yes, but which one will a judge believe between a 19 year old and a sworn officer (say 15 years experience on the force), with absolutely no other evidence ??

[mikey]

Police have always been making up there own rules when it suits some situations.
This is already happening - we have heard from KBer's having done a runner to be knocked off the bike after stopping, manhandled to the ground etc. Is that really necessary or lawful ?
Rough justice has probably been going on since the first Police force.

.

yeah.
bastards knocked this guy off his bike after hed done his runner.
must of been one cool cat doing the runner! must of had visions. of ways to get off dangerous driving charges an failing to stop. twice.

yeah.
one cool cat

i bet it was spudchucka who knocked him off to