Page 324 of 638 FirstFirst ... 224274314322323324325326334374424 ... LastLast
Results 4,846 to 4,860 of 9559

Thread: The American (USA) 2016 presidential elections thread?

  1. #4846
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Go back and re-read post #4786
    Or, you could outline the scenario where the use of Force is Justified, even if it means innocent civilians Killed or Wounded.

    But who are we kidding, you can't and you won't.
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  2. #4847
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    Or, you could outline the scenario where the use of Force is Justified, even if it means innocent civilians Killed or Wounded.

    But who are we kidding, you can't and you won't.
    Have another read - and let the words sink in for a minute or two.

    ‘Look, if something happens in Rwanda-Burundi, we don't care. Take it off the list. US national interest is not involved and we can't put all these silly humanitarian issues on lists, like important problems like the Middle East, North Korea, and so on. Just make it go away.’

  3. #4848
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,832
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    Or, you could outline the scenario where the use of Force is Justified, even if it means innocent civilians Killed or Wounded.

    But who are we kidding, you can't and you won't.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Have another read - and let the words sink in for a minute or two.
    You still haven't answered simple questions what you state to be a simple task.
    Give us the rules of engagement you stated peace keepers could be effective under whilst 100% sure every possible other scenario was able to discounted before lethal force was used.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  4. #4849
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Have another read - and let the words sink in for a minute or two.
    That is neither your statement, nor a scenario where you will accept innocent people being killed or injured as justified.

    As I said, you won't, because you can't.
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  5. #4850
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    That is neither your statement, nor a scenario where you will accept innocent people being killed or injured as justified.

    As I said, you won't, because you can't.
    I'm not interested in playing your autistic little game of inventing scenarios where the loss of innocent human life can be passed off as 'acceptable' or 'justified'.

    I'm interested in figuring out why the international community abandoned hundreds of thousands of Rwandans to their horrific fate.

    America's reasoning appears to be crystal clear.

    Like I've said before.....World Police? - what a crock of shit.

  6. #4851
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I'm not interested in playing your autistic little game of inventing scenarios where the loss of innocent human life can be passed off as 'acceptable' or 'justified'.

    I'm interested in figuring out why the international community abandoned hundreds of thousands of Rwandans to their horrific fate.

    America's reasoning appears to be crystal clear.

    Like I've said before.....World Police? - what a crock of shit.
    Invented senario's?
    That was you.
    Its about time You post the ROI where the UN forces can do what you claim is possible for them to do.
    The ROI where the loss of any human human life is only a last resort yet the peace keepers can still protect themselves and victims was created by you.
    The Rwandans weren't abandoned the UN peace keepers were deployed they were just unable to do anything including protect themselves because of the insufficient ROI.
    Funny thing is the insucficent ROI are designed to appease dullards like you.
    If the had of intervended and prevented the Genocide you would be bleating on about excessive use of force and killing innocents.
    Its a no win situation, Damned if they Do Damned if they don't
    TDL has been real patient thus far with your obvious trolling.

    You have still never explained why Russia never went in there and stopped it.
    France, China and Russia opposed involvement in what was seen as an "internal affair".
    After all they had no problems Selling Guns to Africa they also supported Ethiopia with Troops as Did Cuba during their war..
    While selling Guns and Tanks to their opposition in Somalia.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogaden_War
    Ciina was a Major Supplier to Rwanda military as was France.
    Russia was involved Directly with Troops and Advisors or though their Proxy Cuba in every conflict in that region but not this one.
    It must be because Rwanda a landlocked country with nowhere to build a Naval base to threaten the Suez canal


    Not to mention Angolia and Eritrea
    The dispatch of 36,000 Cuban soldiers to Angola from November 1975 to April 1976 stunned the world and ushered in a period of large-scale operations, including 16,000 Cuban soldiers in Ethiopia in late 1977; Cuban military missions in Congo Brazzaville, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, and Benin; and, above all, the continuing presence in Angola that peaked in 1988 with 52,000 soldiers.
    Ps France had Troops in Rwanda before and During the GEnocide they also trained the Military supplies Gun and Ammo.
    Yet later France was very active at the UN in the discussions about the reinforcement of the UNAMIR in May 1994. In front of the inertia of the international community, France obtained the backing of the UN to lead Opération Turquoise from June 22 to August 22, 1994. The declared goal was to protect the "threatened populations," both by the genocide and by the military conflict between the FPR and the temporary Rwandan government.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  7. #4852
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by husaberk View Post
    Its about time You post the ROI where the UN forces can do what you claim is possible for them to do.
    Refer post #4834.

  8. #4853
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Refer post #4834.
    Thats not an aswer thats a troll misdirection
    You are the one who suggests that it is possible to defend people with force being used only after every other possible scenario is tried that's not at all what an experienced military leader would ever suggest because his first concern is the safety of his troops.
    Its time you put up or shut up and admit you are way out of your depth and far beyond your knowlege base.
    Afterall you didn't even know the UN had peacekeeping troops in Rwanda otherwise you wouldn't have suggested if they were there it would have prevented the genocide.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  9. #4854
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by husaberk View Post
    ....otherwise you wouldn't have suggested if they were there it would have prevented the genocide.
    If you remember rightly, it was Romeo Dallaire who suggested the genocide could have been prevented if he'd had 5000 peacekeeping troops - not me.

  10. #4855
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    If you remember rightly, it was Romeo Dallaire who suggested the genocide could have been prevented if he'd had 5000 peacekeeping troops - not me.

    Incorrect number were only a small part of a complex issue The majority of his correspondence to the UN was him begged for ROI that would allow him to do his job. Plus requesting and being refused permission to act on information where arms caches were.
    Critters with agenda like to make noise that if only there were more troops it wouldn't have occurred but the fact his his hands were tied because his mandate relegated him to being an observer.
    For a start off you mistakenly blamed it on Not having American troops there because you never even knew the UN being deployed there already.

    None of this is you answering what the ROI that meet your target of only using force as a last resort other possible methods had been exhausted would have been able to stop the genocide while keeping the peace keeping troops safe.
    Remember Belgium withdrew its forces after they were killed as they were unable to defend themselves because of insufficient ROI. they had been demanding a change in the original UN mandate and when the UN refused to change it the withdrew their troops, It wasnt the UN that reduced the Number as you said it waa Belguim who did it as the troops were not able to protect themselves under the mandate and ROI.

    Enough of the new diversion You stated that it could have been done now stump up with ROI.
    Dallaire as a miltary leader puts the safety of his troops first so explain how you can achieve what you state is possible.

    Its especially amusing to hear you going on about Dallaire considering a few days ago you never even knew there was an UN peace keeping mission in Rwanda at the time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  11. #4856
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I'm not interested in playing your autistic little game of inventing scenarios where the loss of innocent human life can be passed off as 'acceptable' or 'justified'.

    I'm interested in figuring out why the international community abandoned hundreds of thousands of Rwandans to their horrific fate.
    Husa's already pointed it out, but I think it bears repeating:

    Look in the Mirror.

    You're the reason.

    Anytime the West acts, and innocent people inevitable die: people like you complain. You never give them any credit for ANY action, that ended up in an innocent loss of life. Even if it can be demonstrated, that the action resulted in less innocent loss of life than inaction.

    From your quote - that you keep referring to, as if it's the be-all and end-all:

    given the fiasco of the end of our involvement with Somalia [a few months later], that we probably wouldn't react [to Rwanda].
    What Fiasco are they referring to? That would be the Public Backlash and outrage.

    The whole point of asking you for the Scenario was to demonstrate that you have none.

    If (as you are claiming, and I don't believe) you are so upset at their inaction in Rwanda, how about next time they take out a Genocidal Dictator, instead of conjuring conspiracies, calling for Inquiries and calling them Warmongers - you congratulate them.
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  12. #4857
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    What Fiasco are they referring to? That would be the Public Backlash and outrage.
    No, it's more likely to just be the fact that they lost a few soldiers - and a couple of expensive helicopters.

  13. #4858
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    how about - you congratulate them.

  14. #4859
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,832
    Serbia to prevent ethnic Cleansing.
    Boutros-Ghali wanted 34,000; the Security Council authorized only 7,400..
    Funny how Katman claimsfonly 5000 troops were used Rwanda genocide would not have happened.
    Notice he still attermpts to blame the US when the UN was running the peacekeeping mission.
    Why does he not attack Russia for not sending Troops or China or Belgum for withdrawing their troops.
    Easy they are not America.
    Like TDL states the winging no good excuestards like Katflam are the reason.
    Damned if they do, Damned if they don't.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  15. #4860
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by husaberk View Post
    Funny how Katman claimsfonly 5000 troops were used Rwanda genocide would not have happened.
    Once again, it was Romeo Dallaire who claimed it - not me.

    And there's a good chance he'd have a considerably better idea than you would.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •