Originally Posted by
Katman
Once again (for the fuck knows how manyth time), my comments have been specifically regarding the practice of torture being used as a justification for invading a country - when the invading forces then allow that torture to continue unabated.
The fact that members of those invading forces then help provide the people for that torture to be practiced on, makes that justification even more nonsensical.
I'm not arguing with that, but it's not relevant to my question.
You said the NZ troops were "guilty" of handing prisoners over for torture, I'm asking for your alternative plan.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Bookmarks