There re no such things as 'objective statements'. Everything, and I mean everything, is said from some ideological position ...
It's just that some ideologies rely on making "objective statements" as a way to back up those statements, as it were. Claiming objectivity is one move in the argument, but it is never a valid one.
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Now someone is going to come along and say that "The sky is blue" is an objective statement.
But I would say the sky is Kahurangi, as it is only 'blue' within the English-speaking world, with all its worldviews and positions.
And I would ask you what power you are trying to exercise by making that statement, thereby drawing out your lack of objectivity.
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Whilst I'll acknowledge the partial truth of what you say, there comes a point at which any ideological subjectivity is so minuscule that it is rendered moot. Where that point is, I'm sure you and I could argue that till the Cows come home to roost.
I'd start with something like A is the first letter of the english alphabet. Sure there is some subjectivity, but it is miniscule
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Saying the sky is blue is sexist and not a fair generalisation.
As the sky can be all the colours of the rainbow.
simple question, why did the Soviets modify a air-raid shelter into a gas chamber? what was their intention?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Pep's on internet forum redit get the dirt on Hillary.
Crooked Hillary, even her eyes are crooked.
I've seen this before while she's having her seizures.
simple question, why did the Soviets modify a air-raid shelter into a gas chamber? what was their intention?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks