The American (USA) 2016 presidential elections thread?

[husaberg]

No they fucking well didn't you numb skull.

Well If you say so

In his investigative article, Mr. Chivers discusses the gradual discovery of thousands of chemical weapons, including warheads and shells containing mustard gas and sarin, by American and Iraqi troops after the 2003 United States invasion of the country.

Just because they clearly and obiviously found them doesn't mean you have to agree that they actually exist. Because that would imply you can use math and logic dashed with common sense.
After all Antigravity balls and CGI plane crashes shape shifting lizards aliens you find highly believable and credible.

[yokel]

Well If you say so




Just because they clearly and obiviously found them doesn't mean you have to agree that they actually exist. Because that would imply you can use math and logic dashed with common sense.
After all Antigravity balls and CGI plane crashes shape shifting lizards aliens you find highly believable and credible.

Seen as my stink tablet won't let me cut&paste, how about you paste up the next paragraph.

[Katman]

Seen as my stink tablet won't let me cut&paste, how about you paste up the next paragraph.

That wouldn't suit his agenda.

But I'll do it for him.

The weapons were not part of massive, active stockpiles that the United States set out to destroy by waging a war that would last eight years, take thousands of lives and leave Iraq in chaos. They were “remnants of long-abandoned programs, built in close collaboration with the West,” Mr. Chivers writes.

I'm helpful like that.

[jasonu]

HC is about to be disqualified

Yep she's a total cunt. I wish D.T. would punch her right in the face. His popularity would likely increase if he did...

[YellowDog]

I suspect that once the American people read this thread, in its entirity, and consider all of the evidence presented by our expert commentators; I have no doubt that common sense will prevail.

I am so honoured to have been able to contribute and that we have had so much influence upon the eventual outcome

I wonder if Donald Trump will replace "God bless America", with "God bless Kiwibiker" ?

[oldrider]

I suspect that once the American people read this thread, in its entirity, and consider all of the evidence presented by our expert commentators; I have no doubt that common sense will prevail.

I am so honoured to have been able to contribute and that we have had so much influence upon the eventual outcome

I wonder if Donald Trump will replace "God bless America", with "God bless Kiwibiker" ?

True indeed!

The adage springs to mind: "If you can't lick em - join em"! ... I am sure they will show their appreciation by accepting us with open arms! (no pun intended)

[Brian d marge]

True indeed!

The adage springs to mind: "If you can't lick em - join em"! ... I am sure they will show their appreciation by accepting us with open arms! (no pun intended)

We already are so far up the American arse ..
If you have ever been to Hawaii , you swear you are in auckland
And if the neocons say jump ... Wellington doesnt even ask how high ... Just does it
At least with uncle Donald , he will bomb the shit out of em
Our piece of crap , golum worm tongue .... Is just a slimey embarrassment


sent for a divine source

[husaberg]

Seen as my stink tablet won't let me cut&paste, how about you paste up the next paragraph.

You keep posting there was no WMD, Yet clearly there was, whether there was 1 found or a thousand found there was WMD found. To say there was no WMD found is totally incorrect.

[Woodman]

You keep posting there was no WMD, Yet clearly there was, whether there was 1 found or a thousand found there was WMD found. To say there was no WMD found is totally incorrect.

He read on the internets that there were none so it must be true because the internets isn't msm, even though it is.

[Hemi Makutu]

You keep posting there was no WMD, Yet clearly there was, whether there was 1 found or a thousand found there was WMD found. To say there was no WMD found is totally incorrect.

Was it a 'Tsar bomba' - a massive thermonuclear device?

If not, & there was only one, it likely aint gonna be able to do 'mass destruction', is it, eh fella...

[bogan]

And thus concludeth the thread...

[husaberg]

He read on the internets that there were none so it must be true because the internets isn't msm, even though it is.

Yeah i wonder where old yokel picked up that Katmanism

No, you're not getting it.
The whole point of the mathematics is to confirm the fact that the building fell at freefall.
NIST fudged their figures to try hiding that fact.
As I've said, a building pancaking one floor at a time would not fall at freefall speed.

Why did NIST try to cover up the fact that Building 7 fell at freefall speed Ed?

And yet you're happy to believe that the failure of a single column can bring an entire building down uniformly at freefall speed?

We could swap links all day Ed but I'm more interested in your answer to the question - is it bollocks that Building 7 fell at freefall speed or bollocks that NIST tried to hide that fact?

You still haven't answered the question Ed.
Was it bollocks that the building fell at freefall speed or bollocks that NIST tried to hide that fact?

So if they're not very good at their job why would anyone accept their theory that the failure of one single supporting column could bring a building down uniformly at freefall speed?

So do you buy the story that Building 7 fell at freefall speed into it's own footprint due to some office fires?

Why not stay with Building 7?
Yet it collapsed uniformly at freefall speed straight down into it's footprint.
Demolition experts could only hope for as good an outcome.

Then he finally later aknowledgement, he is clearly wrong

Why would anyone use a point somewhere along the front parapet when the point that Chandler used is at the very corner - a point so precise you could stick a pin into the exact spot.
From the time that precise spot starts to move downward until it disappears from view is not 5.4 seconds.
The mathematics show that that precise point moves almost exactly at freefall.
Here's another one for you to look at.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U

The point is that the videos show conclusively that the building fell at almost exactly freefall.
A building pancaking one floor at a time would not have fallen that fast.

[Hemi Makutu]

Yeah i wonder where old yokel picked up that Katmanism

Yeah, ok, Trump's running with his playbook, but that aint working so good, for you here though, eh husa..

[yokel]

You keep posting there was no WMD, Yet clearly there was, whether there was 1 found or a thousand found there was WMD found. To say there was no WMD found is totally incorrect.

You're complete fucking moron that can't read and has no idea what the context of the phrase 'weapons of mass destruction' in regards to the Iraq war.

How old where you when the yanks were pealing out the 'weapons of mass destruction' propaganda?

[yokel]

That wouldn't suit his agenda.

But I'll do it for him.



I'm helpful like that.

Nice try, shame he's so incredibly stupid.
Maybe pasting the text to a brick and slamming it in his face would be helpful?