Might be time to close this thread as it pollutes KB far too much.
By all means can this thread. I'll open one on the 2020 US elections. In which we can discuss Russia's ongoing interference in elections worldwide, the Republicans gerrymandering and why the world would be a better place without Trump...
OAB says he has no interest in politics, fair enough - but you should. What happens in the US affects NZ directly and indirectly. The abortion row happening at present in the US has it's echoes here now. Talk to your wives and daughters to see how they feel about losing basic rights hard fought for.
The right wing nutters here have been emboldened - not a term I like but it's accurate - by Trump. The next shooting victim could be you or yours. Are you happy with that ? The mosque shootings here can be directly linked to the rise of Trump. QED.
Polluted ? Only by some of the nutters who post in it.
This thread should have been canned as soon as Trump was elected. It's achieved absolutelly nothing since it's inception. It's just an extension of PD.
I'd prefer any thread involving politics. apart from m/c related stuff, imediately got struck down like they do over at AdvRider.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Absolutely spot on. They just close there eye and say nah nah I can't see your post.
They go on about my spelling yet at times are just as bad. Have your head hit by Macchi 339 copopy come down on your head, locking mech had failed, from 1.5mts norrowly missing a locating spiget 3" long and about 1/2" in dia after you have finished an independent inspection on Martin Baker ejection seats and come out of it not altered in some way. I was lucky the mob keep me on full term plus a three year extension. Also I'm gratefull that I can still ride.
I'd seen that back when it came out. I don't much like Rafael (call me Ted) Cruz, a latino who got himself elected as a white supremacist senator in Texas which, to give him credit, is a good trick. He is very flexible though, Trump said Cruz's wife was ugly, and that his father worked for Castro against the US, but Cruz is happy now to kiss Trump's arse.
Having said all that, I know nothing against his witness so have to assume he is telling the truth. Cambridge Analytica*, Facebook, and Google too, they're all at it and there are no controls on what they are doing and that's even before you get to the Russians. And the Bulgarian kids?
I listened to a podcast detailing of how Facebook operated and it really is amazing the precision of their targeting and how they press people's buttons.
It's scary shit.
* Cambridge Analytica has gone now but the same people are doing the same things for Emerdata.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Why do I see a ball of fucking string....... anyhoo, entertaining the possibility that one is wrong doesn't manifest well in some, especially when the majority of society are banging the same drum. Tis safer to walk with the crowd, and safer still to ignore it all entirely ........
Do I need to find you a hurt feelings form? (maybe go smack yer head again, it might fix you)
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I'd written that last post before I'd read Husaberg's which modifies my view of Epstein. Otherwise it stays the same.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
You are confusing the words reason with ability.
You simply refuse to answer the questions as it makes you look like a hypocrite.
The example you used is a perfect example of entirely false narrative being peddled as science and manipulated that has basically zero corroborating evidence.
I will break it down for you
It was a study done by one man https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_...-02_6-1-17.pdf
From basically a one man organisation https://aibrt.org/index.php/people
Carried out using 21 people as a subject group with apparently no control group either. https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_...-02_6-1-17.pdf
Carried out by someone With a long history of not liking google, where he didn't declare that possible bias either.https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/...urity-warning/ https://medium.com/@re_53711/fake-ne...m-914d7ffc7a91
Using a secret methodology he refuses to produce in the study. One which apparently never considered that google uses a algorithm to bases result on what it detects the user whats to find based on previous searches and results.
https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_...-02_6-1-17.pdf
Giving a results that was never peer reviewed in all but one of 15 of his papers
A result other scientist suggest is not creditable.https://www.motherjones.com/politics...ogle-searches/ https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...322-story.html https://medium.com/@re_53711/fake-ne...m-914d7ffc7a91
Your position is not that of devils advocate, its of KB troll.
I dont agree with basically anything at all that Katman says, Yet of late i are certainly getting the idea hes probably right about you Fraser.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks