I see you took the red pill...Originally Posted by Zed
I see you took the red pill...Originally Posted by Zed
Nah I took the blue one, but I negotiated the mainframe Zion codes with an Agent so I could be put back into the Matrix as a rich, intelligent, charming, sprotsbike fanatic who spends his days & nites typing lies over the Internet!Originally Posted by Fish
![]()
word, yo.Originally Posted by Zed
![]()
i'm from London, i had 3 uncles in the gulf war, my Gradfather was a pilot in WWII and i was 1 mile away from our local train station when it was blown up by the IRA. Does that not count for warfare and invasion?Originally Posted by Jim2
Cibby play thing
Too bloody true.Originally Posted by Jim2
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
Not even close.Originally Posted by Postie
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
There is a school of thought that the depressed are actually seeing the most realistic vision of life.
Optimists, on the other hand, are doomed to continual dissappointment.
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
so what is?Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
Cibby play thing
Are you saying that those who are pessimistic are depressed?Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
no, I think he was just using depression as a less-than-correct synnonym for pessimism.Originally Posted by SuperDave
but hes a grumpy old bastard so I doubt youll get him to admit his mistake...
As has already been mentioned, no it doesn't. I've relatives that suffered through the same things you mention too, but the last successful invasion of the British Isles (except for a few power shuffles in Ireland, Wales, and Scotland) was 1066. By a bunch of Pseudo-English/Psuedo-French people.Originally Posted by Postie
The amount of suffering throughout Europe from 1066 to 1995 far outweighs even the losses suffered during WWI and WWII by Great Britain. Human suffering, misery, war, plague, famine, religious persecution, shifts in the balance of power between warring empires, invasions from the Middle East and Far North East all add up to a pretty sorry bunch of catastrophic "events" that conspired to keep the bulk of European Humanity grovelling in shit for a thousand years.
Great Britain leveraged off this and established a Global Empire and a standard of living for its subjects that led to an outbreak of Democracy. It wasn't all peaches and cream for the average Brit, but they were certainly largely better off than their European counterparts.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Nooooh! Don't do that. I, for one, love your "bitch chip", it gives me another perspective on life.Originally Posted by Jim2
Diarrhoea is hereditary - it runs in your jeans
If my nose was running money, I'd blow it all on you...
Being French in 1940, or 1914.Originally Posted by Postie
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
No, the article it was mentioned in was discussing depression.Originally Posted by Fish
Although, we may soon be including pessimism as a mental illness.
Then the number of sickness beneficiaries will soar. (I'll probably apply too, should ace the diagnosis)
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
hrumm. imho it didnt leverage off the position of continental yew-rope so much as it refined the systems of economics developed during the 17th century or therabouts, which alowed it to create wealth and influince beyond its apparent and obvious natural resorces and population.Originally Posted by Jim2
the socio-religeous trends that created the society that spawned newton, hooke and smith were probably more important in that achievement than any relative decline of the european powers throughout the 1600s.
tangentailly, I think that the advantages of an accident of geography, ie, being an island nation, were key.Originally Posted by Jim2
given the uniting of europe under a single imperial banner, a succesful invasion would have been eventually inevitable, hence the necessity for wellington's efforts and adventures in the iberian peninsula to the end of preventnig that situation from arising.
since that never happened, none of the single nation states on the continent ever quite had the ability to mount such an effort over that thousand years or so.
you will note that nazi germany almost managed to create that situation by 1940, however. without assistance from the New World, britain could have eventually been worn down after some continental consolidation of materiel and resources, although in those circumstances hitler would undoubtedly have preferred a far less expensive truce.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks