
Originally Posted by
Akzle
except it isnt. And if your shits air tight you building will always be a nett energy consumer to get the requisite (healthy) number of air changes.
Passive building design ftw.
If you're meaning passive as in 'passive house', they generally require heat recovery from ventilation.
If you mean passive ventilation, it's funny how much 'passive' buildings require continual active involvement, fucking about with windows and what not. And they might work great in warmer climates, yet when it gets to be 0 degrees outside, all of a sudden your passive ventilation makes the place a fuckin icebox.
Especially down South, it's easier to just chuck a heat-recovery system in. Instead of fucking about opening windows after a shower, (or install a solitary bathroom fan - fuck that) we do absolutely nothing, and the heat recovery system takes care of the moisture. You can even set it up to monitor the temp of the hot water pipes to your bathroom and crank the system up for a short period automatically (we didn't bother).
'Sides, how does the running cost of a fan (80-200w in our case depending on speed) compare with the increased heating required to bring the outside air up to the same as heat-recovered air? Considering that Code requires/recommends, what, 0.35ACH as a 'healthy' number? The amount of energy you're recovering becomes pretty attractive.
"It's hard to keep an open mind, when so many people are trying to put things in it"
Bookmarks